Background Implementation of DWI in the abdomen is challenging due to artifacts, particularly those arising from differences in tissue susceptibility. Two-dimensional, spatially-selective radiofrequency (RF) excitation pulses for single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) combined with a reduction in the FOV in the phase-encoding direction (i.e. zooming) leads to a decreased number of k-space acquisition lines, significantly shortening the EPI echo train and potentially susceptibility artifacts. Purpose To assess the feasibility and image quality of a zoomed diffusion-weighted EPI (z-EPI) sequence in MR imaging of the pancreas. The approach is compared to conventional single-shot EPI (c-EPI). Material and Methods 23 patients who had undergone an MRI study of the abdomen were included in this retrospective study. Examinations were performed on a 3T whole-body MR system (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens) equipped with a two-channel fully dynamic parallel transmit array (TimTX TrueShape, Siemens). The acquired sequences consisted of a conventional EPI DWI of the abdomen and a zoomed EPI DWI of the pancreas. For z-EPI, the standard sinc excitation was replaced with a two-dimensional spatially-selective RF pulse using an echo-planar transmit trajectory. Images were evaluated with regard to image blur, respiratory motion artifacts, diagnostic confidence, delineation of the pancreas, and overall scan preference. Additionally ADC values of the pancreatic head, body, and tail were calculated and compared between sequences. Results The pancreas was better delineated in every case (23/23) with z-EPI versus c-EPI. In every case (23/23), both readers preferred z-EPI overall to c-EPI. With z-EPI there was statistically significantly less image blur (p<0.0001) and respiratory motion artifact compared to c-EPI (p<0.0001). Diagnostic confidence was statistically significantly better with z-EPI (p<0.0001). No statistically significant differences in calculated ADC values were observed between the two sequences. Conclusion Zoomed diffusion-weighted EPI leads to substantial image quality improvements with reduction of susceptibility artifacts in pancreatic DWI.
References
[1]
Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, et al. (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11: 102–125.
[2]
Muller MF, Prasad P, Siewert B, Nissenbaum MA, Raptopoulos V, et al. (1994) Abdominal diffusion mapping with use of a whole-body echo-planar system. Radiology 190: 475–478.
[3]
Zhang J, Tehrani YM, Wang L, Ishill NM, Schwartz LH, et al. (2008) Renal masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging–a preliminary experience. Radiology 247: 458–464. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2472070823
[4]
Braithwaite AC, Dale BM, Boll DT, Merkle EM (2009) Short- and midterm reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements at 3.0-T diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen. Radiology 250: 459–465. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2502080849
[5]
Barral M, Sebbag-Sfez D, Hoeffel C, Chaput U, Dohan A, et al. (2013) Characterization of focal pancreatic lesions using normalized apparent diffusion coefficient at 1.5-Tesla: preliminary experience. Diagn Interv Imaging 94: 619–627. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.02.011
[6]
Akisik MF, Aisen AM, Sandrasegaran K, Jennings SG, Lin C, et al. (2009) Assessment of chronic pancreatitis: utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with secretin enhancement. Radiology 250: 103–109. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493080160
[7]
Wang Y, Chen ZE, Nikolaidis P, McCarthy RJ, Merrick L, et al. (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinomas: association with histopathology and tumor grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 33: 136–142. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22414
[8]
Kartalis N, Lindholm TL, Aspelin P, Permert J, Albiin N (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreas tumours. Eur Radiol 19: 1981–1990. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1384-8
[9]
Klauss M, Lemke A, Grunberg K, Simon D, Re TJ, et al. (2011) Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for the differentiation between mass forming chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Invest Radiol 46: 57–63. doi: 10.1097/rli.0b013e3181fb3bf2
[10]
Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T (1999) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging in the upper abdomen: preliminary clinical experience in 61 patients. Abdom Imaging 24: 456–461. doi: 10.1007/s002619900539
[11]
Kwee TC, Takahara T, Koh DM, Nievelstein RA, Luijten PR (2008) Comparison and reproducibility of ADC measurements in breathhold, respiratory triggered, and free-breathing diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. J Magn Reson Imaging 28: 1141–1148. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21569
[12]
Bilgili MY (2012) Reproductibility of apparent diffusion coefficients measurements in diffusion-weighted MRI of the abdomen with different b values. Eur J Radiol 81: 2066–2068. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.06.045
[13]
Naganawa S, Kawai H, Fukatsu H, Sakurai Y, Aoki I, et al. (2005) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: technical challenges and prospects for the future. Magn Reson Med Sci 4: 175–186. doi: 10.2463/mrms.4.175
[14]
Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, et al. (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168: 497–505.
[15]
Morelli J, Porter D, Ai F, Gerdes C, Saettele M, et al. (2013) Clinical evaluation of single-shot and readout-segmented diffusion-weighted imaging in stroke patients at 3 T. Acta Radiol doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120541
Pfeuffer J, van de Moortele PF, Yacoub E, Shmuel A, Adriany G, et al. (2002) Zoomed functional imaging in the human brain at 7 Tesla with simultaneous high spatial and high temporal resolution. Neuroimage 17: 272–286. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1103
[18]
Katscher U, Bornert P, Leussler C, van den Brink JS (2003) Transmit SENSE. Magn Reson Med 49: 144–150. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10353
[19]
Zhu Y (2004) Parallel excitation with an array of transmit coils. Magn Reson Med 51: 775–784. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20011
[20]
Kang KM, Lee JM, Shin CI, Baek JH, Kim SH, et al. (2013) Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography with unenhanced MR imaging for predicting malignancy or invasiveness of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Magn Reson Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.24022
[21]
Herrmann J, Schoennagel BP, Roesch M, Busch JD, Derlin T, et al. (2013) Diffusion-weighted imaging of the healthy pancreas: ADC values are age and gender dependent. J Magn Reson Imaging 37: 886–891. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23871
[22]
Rao RK, Riffel P, Meyer M, Kettnaker PJ, Lemke A, et al. (2012) Implementation of dual-source RF excitation in 3 T MR-scanners allows for nearly identical ADC values compared to 1.5 T MR scanners in the abdomen. PLoS One 7: e32613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032613
[23]
Barral M, Soyer P, Ben Hassen W, Gayat E, Aout M, et al. (2013) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the normal pancreas: reproducibility and variations of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement at 1.5- and 3.0-Tesla. Diagn Interv Imaging 94: 418–427. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2012.12.007
