The study of biodiversity spans many disciplines and includes data pertaining to species distributions and abundances, genetic sequences, trait measurements, and ecological niches, complemented by information on collection and measurement protocols. A review of the current landscape of metadata standards and ontologies in biodiversity science suggests that existing standards such as the Darwin Core terminology are inadequate for describing biodiversity data in a semantically meaningful and computationally useful way. Existing ontologies, such as the Gene Ontology and others in the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry library, provide a semantic structure but lack many of the necessary terms to describe biodiversity data in all its dimensions. In this paper, we describe the motivation for and ongoing development of a new Biological Collections Ontology, the Environment Ontology, and the Population and Community Ontology. These ontologies share the aim of improving data aggregation and integration across the biodiversity domain and can be used to describe physical samples and sampling processes (for example, collection, extraction, and preservation techniques), as well as biodiversity observations that involve no physical sampling. Together they encompass studies of: 1) individual organisms, including voucher specimens from ecological studies and museum specimens, 2) bulk or environmental samples (e.g., gut contents, soil, water) that include DNA, other molecules, and potentially many organisms, especially microbes, and 3) survey-based ecological observations. We discuss how these ontologies can be applied to biodiversity use cases that span genetic, organismal, and ecosystem levels of organization. We argue that if adopted as a standard and rigorously applied and enriched by the biodiversity community, these ontologies would significantly reduce barriers to data discovery, integration, and exchange among biodiversity resources and researchers.
References
[1]
Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proen？a V, Alkemade R, Scharlemann JPW, et al. (2010) Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330: 1496–1501 doi:10.1126/science.1196624.
[2]
Pereira HM, Ferrier S, Walters M, Geller GN, Jongman RHG, et al. (2013) Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339: 277–278 doi:10.1126/science.1229931.
[3]
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, et al. (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486: 59–67 doi:10.1038/nature11148.
[4]
United Nations (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. Opened for signature at the Earth Summit 5 June 1992. Available: http://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1992？/06/19920605%2008-44%20PM/Ch_XXVII_08p.p？df. Accessed 26 May 2013.
[5]
Hardisty A, Roberts D, Addink W, Aelterman B, Agosti D, et al. (2013) A decadal view of biodiversity informatics: challenges and priorities. BMC ecology 13: 16 doi:10.1186/1472-6785-13-16.
[6]
Scholes RJ, Walters M, Turak E, Saarenmaa H, Heip CHR, et al. (2012) Building a global observing system for biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 139–146 doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2011.12.005.
[7]
Jetz W, McPherson JM, Guralnick RP (2012) Integrating biodiversity distribution knowledge: toward a global map of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 151–159 doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.007.
[8]
Davies ZG, Fuller RA, Loram A, Irvine KN, Sims V, et al. (2009) A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biological Conservation 142: 761–771 doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.016.
[9]
Davies N, Meyer C, Gilbert J, Amaral-Zettler L, Deck J, et al. (2012) A call for an international network of genomic observatories (GOs). GigaScience 1: 5 doi:10.1186/2047-217X-1-5.
[10]
Parr CS, Guralnick R, Cellinese N, Page RDM (2012) Evolutionary informatics: unifying knowledge about the diversity of life. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 94–103 doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.001.
[11]
Pyle RL, Earle JL, Greene BD (2008) Five new species of the damselfish genus Chromis (Perciformes: Labroidei: Pomacentridae) from deep coral reefs in the tropical western Pacific. Zootaxa 1671: 3–31 Available: http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/2008/f/zt？01671p031.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2013.
[12]
Fisher BL, Smith MA (2008) A Revision of Malagasy Species of Anochetus Mayr and Odontomachus Latreille (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). PLoS ONE 3 (5) e1787 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001787.
[13]
Penev L, Agosti D, Georgiev T, Catapano T, Miller J, et al. (2010) Semantic tagging of and semantic enhancements to systematics papers: ZooKeys working examples. ZooKeys 50: 1–16 doi:10.3897/zookeys.50.538.
[14]
Imam FT, Larson SD, Bandrowski A, Grethe JS, Gupta A, et al. (2012) Development and use of ontologies inside the neuroscience information framework: a practical approach. Frontiers in Genetics 3 doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00111.
[15]
Vasilevsky N, Johnson T, Corday K, Torniai C, Brush M, et al. (2012) Research resources: curating the new eagle-i discovery system. Database 2012 doi:10.1093/database/bar067.
[16]
Tiffin N, Kelso JF, Powell AR, Pan H, Bajic VB, et al. (2005) Integration of text- and data-mining using ontologies successfully selects disease gene candidates. Nucleic Acids Research 33: 1544–1552 doi:10.1093/nar/gki296.
[17]
Kelling S, Hochachka WM, Fink D, Riedewald M, Caruana R, et al. (2009) Data-intensive science: A new paradigm for biodiversity studies. BioScience 59: 613–620 doi:10.1525/bio.2009.59.7.12.
[18]
Morrison N, Ashburner M, Field D, Lewis S, the Environment Ontology Consortium, et al. (2009) The environment ontology: Linking environmental data. In: H？ebí？ek et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the European conference: Towards Environment. Opportunities of SEIS and SISE: Integrating Environmental Knowledge in Europe. pp. 606–608. Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Available: http://www.e-envi2009.org/?presentations Accessed 10 September 2013
[19]
Buttigieg PL, Morrison N, Smith B, Mungall CJ, Lewis SE (in press) The environment ontology: contextualising biological and biomedical entities. Journal of Biomedical Semantics Available: http://www.jbiomedsem.com/content/pdf/20？41-1480-4-43.pdf.
[20]
Beach J, Blum S, Donoghue M, Ford L, Guralnick R, et al. (2010) A strategic plan for establishing a network integrated biocollections alliance. Available: http://digbiocol.wordpress.com/brochure/. Accessed 26 May 2013.
[21]
Patterson DJ, Cooper J, Kirk PM, Pyle RL, Remsen DP (2010) Names are key to the big new biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 686–691 doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.004.
[22]
Beach JH, Pramanik S, Beaman JH (1993) Hierarchic taxonomic databases. In: Fortuner R, editor. Advances in computer methods for systematic biology: Artificial intelligence, databases, computer vision. Baltimore (ML US): The Johns Hopkins university press. pp. 241–256.
[23]
Berendsohn WG (1995) The concept of “Potential Taxa” in databases. Taxon 44: 207–212 doi:10.2307/1222443.
[24]
Geoffroy M, Berendsohn WG (2003) The concept problem in taxonomy: importance, components, approaches. Schriftenreihe Vegetationsk 39: 5–14.
[25]
Kennedy J, Kukla R, Paterson T (2005) Taxonomic concept transfer schema. Available: http://www.tdwg.org/standards/117/. Accessed 26 May 2013.
[26]
Franz NM, Thau D (2010) Biological taxonomy and ontology development: scope and limitations. Biodiversity Informatics 7: 45–66.
[27]
Franz NM, Peet RK (2009) Towards a language for mapping relationships among taxonomic concepts. Systematics and Biodiversity 7: 5–20. doi: 10.1017/s147720000800282x
[28]
Deans AR, Yoder MJ, Balhoff JP (2012) Time to change how we describe biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27: 78–84 doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.007.
[29]
Handelsman J, Rondon MR, Brady SF, Clardy J, Goodman RM (1998) Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: a new frontier for natural products. Chemistry & Biology 5: R245–R249 doi:10.1016/S1074-5521(98)90108-9.
[30]
Davies N, Field D (2013) Sequencing data: A genomic network to monitor Earth. Nature 481: 145 doi:10.1038/481145a.
[31]
Kattge J, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Prentice IC, Leadley P, et al. (2011) TRY – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biology 17: 2905–2935 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x.
[32]
BIEN project team (2009) Cyberinfrastructure for an integrated botanical information network to investigate the ecological impacts of global climate change on plant biodiversity. Available: http://www.iplantcollaborative.org/sites？/default/files/BIEN_White_Paper.pdf. 26 May 2013.
[33]
Wieczorek J, Bloom D, Guralnick R, Blum S, D？ring M, et al. (2012) Darwin Core: An evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS ONE 7 (1) e29715 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0029715.
[34]
Holetschek J, Dr？ge G, Güntsch A, Berendsohn WG (2012) The ABCD of primary biodiversity data access. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology 146: 771–779 doi:10.1080/11263504.2012.740085.
[35]
Kennedy J, Gales R, Hyam R, Kukla R, Wieczorek J, et al. (2006) Developing a core ontology for taxonomic data. In: Belbin L, Rissoné A, Weitzman A, editors. Proceedings of Taxonomy Data Working Group (TDWG) 2006. Missouri Botanical Gardens, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Available: http://www.tdwg.org/proceedings/article/？view/13. Accessed 26 May 2013.
[36]
Webb C, Baskauf S (2011) Darwin-SW: Darwin Core data for the Semantic Web. Proceedings of Taxonomy Data Working Group (TDWG) 2011. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Available: https://mbgserv18.mobot.org/ocs/index.ph？p/tdwg/2011/paper/view/152. Accessed 26 May 2013.
[37]
Baskauf SJ (2010) Organization of occurrence-related biodiversity resources based on the process of their creation and the role of individual organisms as resource relationship. Biodiversity Informatics 7: 17–44.
[38]
Field D, Amaral-Zettler L, Cochrane G, Cole JR, Dawyndt P, et al. (2011) The Genomic Standards Consortium. PLoS Biol 9: e1001088 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001088.
[39]
Yilmaz P, Kottmann R, Field D, Knight R, Cole JR, et al. (2011) Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat Biotech 29: 415–420 doi:10.1038/nbt.1823.
[40]
Kottmann R, Gray T, Murphy S, Kagan L, Kravitz S, Lombardo T, Field D, Gl？ckner FA (2008) A standard MIGS/MIMS compliant XML schema: toward the development of the Genomic Contextual Data Markup Language (GCDML). OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 12: 115–121 doi:10.1089/omi.2008.0A10.
[41]
Lapp H, Morris RA, Catapano T, Hobern D, Morrison N (2011) Organizing our knowledge of biodiversity. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 37: 38–42 doi:10.1002/bult.2011.1720370411.
[42]
Catapano T, Hobern D, Lapp H, Morris RA, Morrison N, et al. (2011) Recommendations for the use of knowledge organization systems by GBIF version 1.0. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), Copenhagen, Denmark.
[43]
Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, et al. (2007) The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotech 25: 1251–1255 doi:10.1038/nbt1346.
[44]
Wooley J, Field D, Gl？ckner FO (2009) Extending Standards for Genomics and Metagenomics Data: A Research Coordination Network for the Genomic Standards Consortium (RCN4GSC). Standards in Genomic Sciences 1: 159 doi:10.4056/sigs.26218.
[45]
Robbins RJ, Amaral-Zettler L, Bik H, Blum S, Edwards J, et al. (2012) RCN4GSC Workshop Report: Managing data at the interface of biodiversity and (meta)genomics, March 2011. Standards in Genomic Sciences 7 doi:10.4056/sigs.3156511.
[46]
ó Tuama é, Deck J, Dr？ge G, D？ring M, Field D, et al. (2012) Meeting report: hackathon-workshop on Darwin Core and MIxS standards alignment (February 2012). Standards in Genomic Sciences 7 doi:10.4056/sigs.3166513.
[47]
Deck J, Barker K, Beaman R, Buttigieg PL, Dr？ge G, et al. (2013) Clarifying concepts and terms in biodiversity informatics,. Standards in Genomic Sciences 8: 2 doi:10.4056/sigs.3907833.
[48]
Grenon P, Smith B (2004) SNAP and SPAN: Towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4: 69–103 doi:_10.1207/s15427633scc0401_5.
[49]
Arp R, Smith B (2008) Function, role, and disposition in basic formal ontology. The 11th Annual Bio-Ontologies Meeting. Toronto, Canada. pp. 1–4. doi:10101/npre.2008.1941.1
[50]
The Gene Ontology Consortium (2012) The Gene Ontology: enhancements for 2011. Nucleic Acids Research 40: D559–D564 doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1028.
[51]
The Gene Ontology Consortium (2001) Creating the Gene Ontology resource: design and implementation. Genome Research 11: 1425–1433 doi:10.1101/gr.180801.
[52]
Eilbeck K, Lewis SE (2004) Sequence Ontology annotation guide. Comparative and Functional Genomics 5: 642–647 doi:10.1002/cfg.446.
[53]
Bada M, Eilbeck K (2012) Efforts toward a more consistent and interoperable Sequence Ontology. In: Cornet R, Stevens R, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Ontology (ICBO 2012), KR-MED Series. Graz, Austria. Available: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-897/session3-pape？r13.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2013.
[54]
Brinkman R, Courtot M, Derom D, Fostel J, He Y, et al. (2010) Modeling biomedical experimental processes with OBI. Journal of Biomedical Semantics 1: S7 doi:10.1186/2041-1480-1-S1-S7.
[55]
Horridge M, Drummond N, Goodwin J, Rector A, Stevens R, et al. (2006) The Manchester OWL Syntax. In Proc of the 2006 OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop (OWL-ED2006). Available: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-216/submission_9.？pdf. Accessed 26 May 2013.
[56]
Cowell LG, Smith B (2010) Infectious Disease Ontology. In: Sintchenko V, editor. Infectious Disease Informatics: Springer-Verlag New York. pp. 373–395. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1327-2_19
[57]
Gkoutos GV, Schofield PN, Hoehndorf R (2012) Chapter Four - The Neurobehavior Ontology: an ontology for annotation and integration of behavior and behavioral phenotypes. In: Chesler EJ, Haendel MA, editors. International Review of Neurobiology: Elsevier. pp. 69–87. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-388408-4.00004-6
[58]
Hebert P, Cywinska A, Ball S, deWaard J (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 313–321 doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2218.
[59]
Check E (2006) Treasure island: pinning down a model ecosystem. Nature 439: 378–379 doi:10.1038/439378a.
[60]
Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data - The story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS) 5: 1–22 doi:10.4018/jswis.2009081901.
[61]
MicroB3 (2012) Deliverable 4.2: Best practices and e-conference report. Available: http://www.microb3.eu/sites/default/file？s/deliverables/MB3_D4_2_PU.pdf Accessed 31 July 2013
[62]
Stoltzfus A, O'Meara B, Whitacre J, Mounce R, Gillesie E, et al. (2012) Sharing and re-use of phylogenetic trees (and associated data) to facilitate synthesis. BMC Research Notes 5: 574 doi:10.1186/1756-0500-5-574.
[63]
Lobo JM, Jiménez-Valverde A, Hortal J (2010) The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. Ecography 3: 103–114 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06039.x.
[64]
Ceusters W, Elkin P, Smith B (2007) Negative findings in electronic health records and biomedical ontologies: A realist approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics 76: s326–s333 doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.02.003.
[65]
Haendel MA, Neuhaus F, Osumi-Sutherland D, Mabee PM, Mejino Jr JLV, et al. (2008) CARO - The Common Anatomy Reference Ontology. In: Burger A, Davidson D, Baldock R, editors. Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics: Springer London. pp. 327–349. doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-885-2_16
[66]
Madin JS, Bowers S, Schildhauer MP, Jones MB (2007) Advancing ecological research with ontologies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 159–168 doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.007.
