Purpose To evaluate the image quality and radiation dose of combined heart, head, and neck CT angiography (CTA) using prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered high-pitch spiral scan protocol, compared with single coronary CTA. Materials and Methods 151 consecutive patients were prospectively included and randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 (n = 47) underwent combined heart, neck, and head CTA using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral (Flash) scan protocol with a single-phase intravenous injection of iodinated contrast and saline flush; Group 2 (n = 51) underwent single coronary CTA with Flash scan protocol; and Group 3 (n = 53) underwent single coronary CTA with prospective sequence scan protocol. All patients were examined on a dual source CT (Definition FLASH). The image quality was determined for each CT study. Results Patients of scanning protocol Group 1, 2, and 3 showed no significant differences in age, sex, heart rates, and BMI. Evaluation of coronary artery image quality showed comparable results in the three scanning protocol groups on a per patient-based analysis. In group 1, image quality was found to be sufficient to be diagnostic in all arterial segments of carotid arteries. The mean dose-length product (DLP) for group 1 was 256.3±24.5 mGy×cm and was significantly higher in comparison with group 2 (93.4±19.9 mGy×cm; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference of DLP between group 1 and group 3 (254.1±69.9 mGy×cm). Conclusions The combined heart, neck, and head arteries scan using prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered high-pitch spiral scan protocol in 1 single examination resulted in an excellent opacification of the aorta, the carotid arteries, and the coronary arteries and provided a good image quality with low radiation dose.
References
[1]
Murray CJ, Lopez AD (1997) Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 349: 1269–1276. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07493-4
[2]
Gaziano JM (2001) Global burden of cardiovascular disease. In Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P, editors. Heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 6th edition. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company. pp. 1–17.
[3]
Li AH, Chu YT, Yang LH, Chen KC, Chu SH (2007) More coronary artery stenosis, more cerebral artery stenosis? A simultaneous angiographic study discloses their strong correlation. Heart Vessels 22: 297–302. doi: 10.1007/s00380-006-0971-8
[4]
Coskun U, Yildiz A, Esen OB, Baskurt M, Cakar MA, et al. (2009) Relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and coronary angiographic findings: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 59: 1–5. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-7-59
[5]
Calvet D, Touzé E, Varenne O, Sablayrolles JL, Weber S, et al. (2010) Prevalence of asymptomatic coronary artery disease in ischemic stroke patients: the PRECORIS study. Circulation 121: 1623–1629. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.906958
[6]
Steinvil A, Sadeh B, Arbel Y, Justo D, Belei A, et al. (2011) Prevalence and predictors of concomitant carotid and coronary artery atherosclerotic disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 57: 779–783. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.047
[7]
Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP, Aviv RI, Fox AJ (2008) Classification of carotid stenosis by millimeter CT angiography measures: effects of prevalence and gender. Am J Neuroradiol 29: 1677–1683. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.a1210
[8]
Puchner S, Popovic M, Wolf F, Reiter M, Lammer J, et al. (2009) Multidetector CTA in the quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis: value of different reformation techniques and axial source images compared with selective carotid arteriography. J Endovasc Ther 16: 336–342. doi: 10.1583/08-2636.1
[9]
Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Arbab-Zadeh A, Niinuma H, et al. (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359: 2324–2336. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0806576
[10]
Moon JH, Park EA, Lee W, Yin YH, Chung JW, et al. (2011) The diagnostic accuracy, image quality and radiation dose of 64-slice dual-source CT in daily practice: a single institution's experience.Korean J Radiol. 12: 308–318. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2011.12.3.308
[11]
Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S, Leber AW, Becker A, et al. (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol 42: 684–691. doi: 10.1097/rli.0b013e31806907d0
[12]
Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, et al. (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16: 2739–2747. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0474-0
[13]
Vanhoenacker PK, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Van Heste R, Decramer I, Van Hoe LR, et al. (2007) Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 244: 419–428. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442061218
[14]
Weustink AC, Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Otsuka M, Pugliese F, et al. (2007) Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 50: 786–794. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.068
[15]
Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298: 317–323. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.3.317
[16]
Ardekani MS, Movahed MR, Movafagh S, Ghahramani N (2005) Contrast-induced nephropathy: a review. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 6: 82–85. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2005.07.004
[17]
Tublin ME, Murphy ME, Tessler FN (1998) Current concepts in contrast media-induced nephropathy. Am J Roentgenol 171: 933–939. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.4.9762972
[18]
Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M, Pflederer T, Anders K, et al. (2011) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4: 328–337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.01.012
[19]
Sommer WH, Albrecht E, Bamberg F, Schenzle JC, Johnson TR, et al. (2010) Feasibility and radiation dose of high-pitch acquisition protocols in patients undergoing dual-source cardiac CT. Am J Roentgenol 195: 1306–1312. doi: 10.2214/ajr.10.4416
[20]
Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, Baumueller S, Goetti R, et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur Radiol 19: 2896–2903. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1618-9
[21]
Ertel D, Lell MM, Harig F, Flohr T, Schmidt B, et al. (2009) Cardiac spiral dual-source CT with high pitch: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 19: 2357–2362. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1503-6
[22]
Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, Schepis T, Pflederer T, et al. (2010) Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 31: 340–346. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp470
[23]
Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, Baumueller S, Goetti R, et al. (2010) Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart 96: 933–938. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2009.189100
[24]
Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A, Nieman K, Weustink AC, et al. (2011) Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology 261: 779–786. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110606
[25]
Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, et al. (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51: 5–40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.51.4.5
[26]
Shuman WP, Branch KR, May JM, Mitsumori LM, Lockhart DW, et al. (2008) Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology 248: 431–437. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482072192
[27]
Beitzke D, Wolf F, Edelhauser G, Plank C, Schernthaner R, et al. (2011) Computed tomography angiography of the carotid arteries at low kV settings: a prospective randomised trial assessing radiation dose and diagnostic confidence. Eur Radiol 21: 2434–2444. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2188-1
[28]
Fujikawa A, Tsuchiya K, Imai M, Nitatori T (2010) CT angiography covering both cervical and cerebral arteries using high iodine concentration contrast material with dose reduction on a 16 multidetector-row system. Neuroradiology 52: 291–295. doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0611-y
[29]
Ferencik M, Nomura CH, Maurovich-Horvat P, Hoffmann U, Pena AJ, et al. (2006) Quantitative parameters of image quality in 64-slice computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries. Eur J Radiol 57: 373–379. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.023
[30]
Bjerrum IS, Sand NP, Poulsen MK, N？rgaard BL, Sidelmann JJ, et al. (2013) Non-invasive assessments reveal that more than half of randomly selected middle-aged individuals have evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis: a DanRisk substudy. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29: 301–308. doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0091-8
[31]
Johnson KM, Dowe DA, Brink JA (2009) Traditional clinical risk assessment tools do not accurately predict coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden: a CT angiography study. Am J Roentgenol 192(1): 235–243. doi: 10.2214/ajr.08.1056
[32]
Napoli A, Catalano C, Francone M, Sciacca V, Carbone I, et al. (2009) Imaging coronary and extracoronary atherosclerosis: feasibility and impact of whole-body computed tomography angiography. Eur Radiol 19: 1704–1714. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1342-5
[33]
Arca M, Quagliarini F, Pigna G, Catalano C, Napoli A (2011) Severe coronary and extracoronary atherosclerosis in autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia detected by whole-body computed tomography angiography. Intern Emerg Med 6: 571–573. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0550-6
[34]
Nair SB, Malik R, Khattar RS (2012) Carotid intima-media thickness: ultrasound measurement, prognostic value and role in clinical practice. Postgrad Med J 88: 694–699. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2011-130214
[35]
Furtado AD, Adraktas DD, Brasic N, Cheng SC, Ordovas K, et al. (2010) The triple rule-out for acute ischemic stroke: imaging the brain, carotid arteries, aorta, and heart. Am J Neuroradiol 31: 1290–1296. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.a2075
[36]
Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, Fink C, Rist C, et al. (2007) Optimization of contrast material administration for electrocardiogram-gated computed tomographic angiography of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31: 265–271. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000236421.35761.7a
[37]
Kim JJ, Dillon WP, Glastonbury CM, Provenzale JM, Wintermark M (2010) Sixty-four-section multidetector CT-angiography of carotid arteries: a systematic analysis of image quality and artifacts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31: 91–99. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.a1768
