全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Intercropping with Shrub Species That Display a ‘Steady-State’ Flowering Phenology as a Strategy for Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Agroecosystems

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090510

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Animal species in the Neotropics have evolved under a lower spatiotemporal patchiness of food resources compared to the other tropical regions. Although plant species with a steady-state flowering/fruiting phenology are rare, they provide predictable food resources and therefore may play a pivotal role in animal community structure and diversity. I experimentally planted a supplemental patch of a shrub species with a steady-state flowering/fruiting phenology, Hamelia patens Jacq., into coffee agroforests to evaluate the contribution of this unique phenology to the structure and diversity of the flower-visiting community. After accounting for the higher abundance of captured animals in the coffee agroforests with the supplemental floral resources, species richness was 21% higher overall in the flower-visiting community in these agroforests compared to control agroforests. Coffee agroforests with the steady-state supplemental floral patch also had 31% more butterfly species, 29% more hummingbird species, 65% more wasps and 85% more bees than control coffee agroforests. The experimental treatment, together with elevation, explained 57% of the variation in community structure of the flower-visiting community. The identification of plant species that can support a high number of animal species, including important ecosystem service providers, is becoming increasingly important for restoration and conservation applications. Throughout the Neotropics plant species with a steady-state flowering/fruiting phenology can be found in all aseasonal forests and thus could be widely tested and suitable species used throughout the tropics to manage for biodiversity and potentially ecosystem services involving beneficial arthropods.

References

[1]  Stiles G (1975) Ecology, flowering phenology and hummingbird pollination of some Costa Rican Heliconia species. Ecology 56: 285–301. doi: 10.2307/1934961
[2]  Fleming TH, Breitwisch R, Whitesides GH (1987) Patterns of tropical vertebrate frugivore diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18: 91–109. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.000515
[3]  Sakai S (2001) Phenological diversity in tropical forests. Popul Ecol 43: 77–86. doi: 10.1007/pl00012018
[4]  Fleming TH, Muchhala N (2008) Nectar-feeding bird and bat niches in two worlds: pantropical comparisons of vertebrate pollination systems. J Biogeogr 35: 764–780. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01833.x
[5]  Gentry AH (1982) Neotropical floristic diversity: phytogeographical connections between Central and South America, Pleistocene climatic fluctuations, or an accident of the Andean orogeny? Ann Mo Bot Gar 69: 557–593. doi: 10.2307/2399084
[6]  Newstrom LE, Frankie GW, Baker HG (1994) A new classification for plant phenology based on flowering patterns in lowland tropical rain forest trees at La Selva, Costa Rica. Biotropica 26: 141–159. doi: 10.2307/2388804
[7]  Gentry AH (1974) Flowering phenology and diversity in tropical Bignoniaceae. Biotropica 6: 64–68. doi: 10.2307/2989698
[8]  Sakai S (2000) Reproductive phenology of gingers in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Borneo. J Trop Ecol 16: 337–354. doi: 10.1017/s0266467400001449
[9]  Baker HG (1963) Evolutionary mechanisms in pollination biology. Science 139: 877–883. doi: 10.1126/science.139.3558.877
[10]  Terborgh J (1986) Keystone plant resources. In: Soule ME, ed. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. pp 330–344.
[11]  Levey DJ (1990) Habitat-dependent fruiting behaviour of an understorey tree, Miconia centrodesma, and tropical treefall gaps as keystone habitats for frugivores in Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 6: 409–420. doi: 10.1017/s026646740000479x
[12]  Peres CA (2000) Identifying keystone plant resources in tropical forests: the case of gums from Parkia pods. J Trop Ecol 16: 287–317. doi: 10.1017/s0266467400001413
[13]  Kinnaird MF, O’Brien TG (2005) Fast foods of the forest: the influence of figs on primates and hornbills across Wallace’s line. In: Dew JL, Boubli JP, eds. Tropical fruits and frugivores: the search for strong interactors. Springer, The Netherlands. pp 37–57.
[14]  Stevenson P (2005) Potential keystone plant species for the frugivore community at Tinigua Park, Colombia. In: Dew JL, Boubli JP, eds. Tropical fruits and frugivores: the search for strong interactors. Springer, The Netherlands. pp 155–184.
[15]  Ackerman JD (1983) Diversity and seasonality of male euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in central Panama. Ecology 64: 274–283. doi: 10.2307/1937075
[16]  Dixon KW (2009) Pollination and restoration. Science 325: 571–573. doi: 10.1126/science.1176295
[17]  Menz MHM, Phillips RD, Winfree R, Kremen C, Aizen MA, Johnson SD, Dixon KW (2011) Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends Plant Sci 16: 4–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.006
[18]  Opler PA, Frankie GW, Baker HG (1980) Comparative phenological studies of treelet and shrub species in tropical wet and dry forests in the lowlands of Costa Rica. J Ecol 68: 167–88. doi: 10.2307/2259250
[19]  Kang H, Bawa KS (2003) Effects of successional status, habit, sexual systems, and pollinators on flowering patterns in tropical rain forest trees. Am J Bot 90: 865–876. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.6.865
[20]  Schnitzer SA, Carson WP (2001) Treefall gaps and the maintenance of species diversity in a tropical forest. Ecology 82: 913–919. doi: 10.2307/2679891
[21]  Dalling JW, Muller-Landau HC, Wright SJ, Hubbell SP (2002) Role of dispersal in the recruitment limitation of neotropical pioneer species. J Ecol 90: 714–727. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00706.x
[22]  Wunderle JM, Willig MR, Henriques LMP (2005) Avian distribution in treefall gaps and understorey of terra firme forest in the lowland Amazon. Ibis 147: 109–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919x.2005.00382.x
[23]  Russell KN, Ikerd H, Droege S (2005) The potential conservation value of unmowed powerline strips for native bees. Biol Conserv 124: 133–148. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.022
[24]  Hopwood JL (2008) The contribution of roadside grassland restoration to native bee conservation. Biol Conserv 141: 2632–2640. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.026
[25]  Milton K, Giacalone J, Wright SJ, Stockmayer G (2005) Do frugivore population fluctuations reflect fruit production? Evidence from Panama. In: Dew JL, Boubli JP, eds. Tropical fruits and frugivores: the search for strong interactors. Springer, The Netherlands. pp 5–35.
[26]  Greenberg R, Perfecto I, Philpott SM (2008) Agroforests as model systems for tropical ecology. Ecology 89: 913–914. doi: 10.1890/07-1578.1
[27]  Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 955–961. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2306
[28]  Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Mas A, Soto Pinto L (2006) Biodiversity, yield and shade coffee certification. Ecol Econ 54: 435–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.009
[29]  Peters VE, Mordecai R, Carroll CR, Cooper RJ, Greenberg R (2010) Bird community response to fruit energy. J Anim Ecol 79: 824–835. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01699.x
[30]  Philpott SM, Bichier (2011) Effects of shade tree removal on birds in coffee agroecosystems in Chiapas, Mexico. Agri, Ecosyst, Environ
[31]  Peters VE, Greenberg R (2013) Fruit supplementation affects birds but not arthropod predation by birds in Costa Rican agroforestry systems. Biotropica 45: 102–110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2012.00891.x
[32]  Hernandez SM, Mattson BJ, Peters VE, Cooper RJ, Carroll CR (2013) Coffee agroforests remain beneficial for Neotropical bird community conservation across seasons. PLOSone 8: e65101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065101
[33]  Koptur S, Haber WA, Frankie GW, Baker HG (1988) Phenological studies of shrub and treelet species in tropical cloud forests of Costa Rica. J Trop Ecol 4: 323–346. doi: 10.1017/s0266467400002984
[34]  Bawa KS, Kang H, Grayum MH (2003) Relationships among time, frequency, and duration of flowering in tropical rain forest trees. Am J Bot 90: 877–887. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.6.877
[35]  Collwell RK (1995) Effects of nectar consumption by the hummingbird flower mite, Proctolaelaps kirmsei on nectar availability in Hamelia patens. Biotropica 27: 206–217. doi: 10.2307/2388996
[36]  Lasso E, Naranjo ME (2003) Effect of pollinators and nectar robbers on nectar production and pollen deposition in Hamelia patens (Rubiaceae). Biotropica 35: 57–66. doi: 10.1646/0006-3606(2003)035[0057:eopanr]2.0.co;2
[37]  Johnson SD, Steiner KE (2000) Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol 15: 140–143. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01811-x
[38]  DeVries PJ (1987) The butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.
[39]  DeVries PJ (1997) The butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history, Vol. II: Riodinidae. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.
[40]  Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996) Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv Biol 10: 99–109. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010099.x
[41]  Peters VE, Carroll CR, Cooper RJ, Greenberg R, Solis M (2013) The contribution of plant species with a steady-state flowering phenology to native bee conservation and bee pollination services. Insect Conserv Diver 6: 45–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00189.x
[42]  Power AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Phil Trans R Soc B 365: 2959–2971. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
[43]  R Development Core Team (2008) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
[44]  Colwell RK (2009) EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8.2. User's Guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates.
[45]  Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK (2001) Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol Lett 4: 379–391. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x
[46]  Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, et al. (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14: 19–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x
[47]  Halvorsen R, Edvardsen A (2009) The concept of habitat specificity revisited. Landscape Ecol 24: 851–861. doi: 10.1007/s10980-009-9363-7
[48]  Diek?tter T, Crist TO (2013) Quantifying habitat-specific contributions to insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes. Insect Conserv Diver DOI: 10.1111/icad.12015
[49]  Feinsinger P (1978) Ecological interactions between plants and hummingbirds in a successional tropical community. Ecol Monogr 48: 269–287. doi: 10.2307/2937231
[50]  Borrell BJ (2005) Long tongues and loose niches: evolution of euglossine bees and their nectar flowers. Biotropica 37: 664–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00084.x
[51]  Thomas CD, Lackie PM, Brisco MJ, Hepper DN (1986) Interactions between hummingbirds and butterflies at a Hamelia patens bush. Biotropica 18: 161–165. doi: 10.2307/2388759
[52]  Chauhan S, Galetto L (2009) Reproductive biology of the Hamelia patens Jacq. (Rubiaceae) in Northern India. J Plant Reprod Biol 1: 63–71.
[53]  Newstrom LE, Frankie GW, Baker HG, Colwell RK (1994) Diversity of long-term flowering patterns. In: McDade LA, Bawa KS, Hespenheide HA, Hartshorn GS, eds. La Selva: Ecology and natural history of a neotropical rain forest. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. pp 142–160.
[54]  Levey DJ (1987) Facultative ripening in Hamelia patens (Rubiaceae): effects of fruit removal and rotting. Oecologia 74: 203–208. doi: 10.1007/bf00379360
[55]  Mills LS, Soule ME, Doak DF (1993) The keystone-species concept in ecology and conservation. BioScience 43: 219–224. doi: 10.2307/1312122
[56]  Scheper J, Holzschuh A, Kuussaari M, Potts SG, Rundlof M, et al. (2013) Environmental factors driving the effectiveness of European agri-environmental measures in mitigating pollinator loss- a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 16: 912–920. doi: 10.1111/ele.12128

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133