全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Ecosystem Services (ES) are an established conceptual framework for attributing value to the benefits that nature provides to humans. As the promise of robust ES-driven management is put to the test, shortcomings in our ability to accurately measure, map, and value ES have surfaced. On the research side, mainstream methods for ES assessment still fall short of addressing the complex, multi-scale biophysical and socioeconomic dynamics inherent in ES provision, flow, and use. On the practitioner side, application of methods remains onerous due to data and model parameterization requirements. Further, it is increasingly clear that the dominant “one model fits all” paradigm is often ill-suited to address the diversity of real-world management situations that exist across the broad spectrum of coupled human-natural systems. This article introduces an integrated ES modeling methodology, named ARIES (ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services), which aims to introduce improvements on these fronts. To improve conceptual detail and representation of ES dynamics, it adopts a uniform conceptualization of ES that gives equal emphasis to their production, flow and use by society, while keeping model complexity low enough to enable rapid and inexpensive assessment in many contexts and for multiple services. To improve fit to diverse application contexts, the methodology is assisted by model integration technologies that allow assembly of customized models from a growing model base. By using computer learning and reasoning, model structure may be specialized for each application context without requiring costly expertise. In this article we discuss the founding principles of ARIES - both its innovative aspects for ES science and as an example of a new strategy to support more accurate decision making in diverse application contexts.

References

[1]  Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, et al. (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 21–28. doi: 10.1890/080025
[2]  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: living beyond our means - Natural assets and human well-being. 28 p.
[3]  Martinez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P (2012) Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management 8: 17–25. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2012.663792
[4]  Vigerstol KL, Aukema JE (2011) A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 2403–2409. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040
[5]  Waage S, Kester C, Armstrong K (2013) Global Public Trends in Ecosystem Services, 2009–2012. San Francisco: BSR. 25 p.
[6]  Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, et al. (2010) The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 377–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x
[7]  Bagstad KJ, Johnson GW, Voigt B, Villa F (2013) Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosystem Services 4: 117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012
[8]  Costanza R, dArge R, deGroot R, Farber S, Grasso M, et al. (1997) The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
[9]  Troy A, Wilson MA (2006) Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics 60: 435–449. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007
[10]  Tallis H, Polasky S (2009) Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services as an Approach for Conservation and Natural-Resource Management. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences 1162: 265–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04152.x
[11]  Fisher B, Turner RK, Burgess ND, Swetnam RD, Green J, et al. (2011) Measuring, modeling and mapping ecosystem services in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania. Progress in Physical Geography 35: 595–611. doi: 10.1177/0309133311422968
[12]  Johnson GW, Bagstad K, Snapp R, Villa F (2012) Service Path Attribution Networks (SPANs): A Network Flow Approach to Ecosystem Service Assessment. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems 3: 54–71. doi: 10.4018/jaeis.2012070104
[13]  Johnson GW, Bagstad KJ, Snapp R, Villa F (2010) Service Path Attribute Networks (SPANs): Spatially quantifying the flow of ecosystem services from landscapes to people. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6016: 238–253. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12156-2_18
[14]  Kareiva PM, Tallis H, Ricketts T, Daily GC, Polasky S (2011) Natural capital : theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. New York: Oxford University Press. 365 p.
[15]  Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Muller F (2012) Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators 21: 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
[16]  Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, Defries RS, et al. (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 1305–1312. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808772106
[17]  Scheffer M, Bascompte J, Brock WA, Brovkin V, Carpenter SR, et al. (2009) Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461: 53–59. doi: 10.1038/nature08227
[18]  Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591–596. doi: 10.1038/35098000
[19]  Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4: 390–405. doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5
[20]  Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, et al. (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 8812–8819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109
[21]  Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Waage S, Wintrop R (2013) A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services 5: 27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004
[22]  Syrbe RU, Walz U (2012) Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators 21: 80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013
[23]  TEEB (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations.; Kumar P, editor. London and Washington: Earthscan.
[24]  Bagstad K, Semmens D, Winthrop R, Jaworski D, Larson J (2012) Ecosystem Services Valuation to Support Decision Making on Public Lands - A Case Study of the San Pedro River Watershed, Arizona. U.S. Geological Survey. 93 p.
[25]  Haines-Young RH, Potschin M (2011) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): 2011 Update.: European Environmental Agency. EEA/BSS/07/007 EEA/BSS/07/007.
[26]  Johnson GW, Snapp R, Villa F, Bagstad K (2012) Modelling Ecosystem Services Flows under Uncertainty with Stochastic SPAN; Leipzig, Germany.
[27]  Bagstad K, Villa F, Johnson GW, Voigt B (2011) ARIES - ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: a guide to models and data. 122 p.
[28]  Daily GC (1997) Nature's services : societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press. 392 p.
[29]  DeGroot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ (2002) A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393–408. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00089-7
[30]  Carpenter SR, Castilla JC, deGroot RS, Mooney H, Naeem S, et al.. (2003) Ecosystems and their Services. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human well-being: a Framework for Assessment 245 pp. NY: Island Press. 49–70.
[31]  Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, et al. (2012) Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109: 8812–8819. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109
[32]  Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics 63: 616–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.002
[33]  Fisher B, Turner K, Zylstra M, Brouwer R, de Groot R, et al. (2008) Ecosystem Services and Economic Theory: Integration for Policy-Relevant Research. Ecological Applications 18: 2050–2067. doi: 10.1890/07-1537.1
[34]  Wallace KJ (2007) Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions. Biological Conservation 139: 235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015
[35]  Nahlik AM, Kentula ME, Fennessy MS, Landers DH (2012) Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecological Economics 77: 27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.01.001
[36]  Palomo I, Martín-López B, Potschin M, Haines-Young R, Montes C (2013) National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosystem Services 4: 104–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.09.001
[37]  Villa F, Bagstad K, Johnson GW, Voigt B (2011) Scientific instruments for climate change adaptation: estimating and optimizing the efficiency of ecosystem services provision. Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales 11: 83–98.
[38]  Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 7280–7287. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082080899
[39]  Salzman J (2005) Creating markets for ecosystem services: notes from the field. New York University Law Review 80: 870–961.
[40]  McCann RK, Marcot BG, Ellis R (2006) Bayesian belief networks: applications in ecology and natural resource management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 3053–3062. doi: 10.1139/x06-238
[41]  Marcot BG, Thompson MP, Runge MC, Thompson FR, McNulty S, et al. (2012) Recent advances in applying decision science to managing national forests. Forest Ecology and Management 285: 123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.08.024
[42]  Cowell RG, Dawid AP, Lauritzen SL, Spiegelhalter DJ (1999) Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. New York: Springer.
[43]  van Nes EH, Scheffer M (2005) Implications of Spatial Heterogeneity for Catastrophic Regime Shifts in Ecosystems. Ecology 86: 1797–1807. doi: 10.1890/04-0550
[44]  Martín-López B, Montes C, Benayas J (2008) Economic Valuation of Biodiversity Conservation: the Meaning of Numbers. Conservation Biology 22: 624. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00921.x
[45]  Sagoff M (2011) The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 70: 497. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.10.006
[46]  Villa F (2009) Semantically-driven meta-modelling: automating model construction in an environmental decision support system for the assessment of ecosystem services flow. In: Athanasiadis IN, Mitkas PA, Rizzoli AE, Marx Gomez J, editors. Information Technology in Environmental Engineering. New York, NY: Springer. 23–36.
[47]  Villa F, Athanasiadis IN, Rizzoli AE (2009) Modelling with knowledge: a review of emerging semantic approaches to environmental modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 24: 577–587. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.09.009
[48]  Argent RM (2004) An overview of model integration for environmental application - components, frameworks and semantics. Environmental Modelling & Software 19: 219–234. doi: 10.1016/s1364-8152(03)00150-6
[49]  Villa F (2007) A semantic framework and software design to enable the transparent integration, reorganization and discovery of natural systems knowledge. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 29: 79–96. doi: 10.1007/s10844-006-0032-x
[50]  Moore RV, Tindall CI (2005) An overview of the open modelling interface and environment (the OpenMI). Environmental Science & Policy 8: 279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.03.009
[51]  David O, Ascough Ii JC, Lloyd W, Green TR, Rojas KW, et al. (2013) A software engineering perspective on environmental modeling framework design: The Object Modeling System. Environmental Modelling & Software 39: 201–213. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.006
[52]  Simmhan YL, Plale B, Gannon D (2005) A survey of data provenance in e-science. SIGMOD Rec 34: 31–36. doi: 10.1145/1084805.1084812
[53]  Gruber TR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43: 907–928. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081
[54]  Madin JS, Bowers S, Schildhauer MP, Jones MB (2008) Advancing ecological research with ontologies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23: 159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.007
[55]  Raskin RG, Pan MJ (2005) Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET). Computers & Geosciences 31: 1119–1125. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.12.004
[56]  Gangemi A, Guarino N, Masolo C, Oltramari A, Schneider L (2002) Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Proceedings 2473: 166–181. doi: 10.1007/3-540-45810-7_18
[57]  Villa F, Scott JL, Athanasiadis IN (2013) Thinklab software repository. Online: bitbucket.org/ariesteam/thinklab.
[58]  German D, González-Barahona J (2009) An Empirical Study of the Reuse of Software Licensed under the GNU General Public License. In: Boldyreff C, Crowston K, Lundell B, Wasserman A, editors. Open Source Ecosystems: Diverse Communities Interacting: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 185–198.
[59]  Bagstad KJ, Villa F, Batker D, Harrison-Cox J, Voigt B, et al. (In review) From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society.
[60]  Portela R, Nunes PALD, Onofri L, Villa F, Shepard A, et al.. (2012) Assessing and Valuing Ecosytem Services in the Ankeniheny-Zahamena Corridor, Madagascar: A Demonstration Case Study for the Wealth Accounting and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services (WAVES) Global Partnership. New York: World Bank.
[61]  Villa F, Voigt B, Erickson J (2013) New perspectives in ecosystem services science as instruments to understand environmental securities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences Forthcoming.
[62]  Wendland KJ, Honzák M, Portela R, Vitale B, Rubinoff S, et al. (2010) Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar. Ecological Economics 69: 2093–2107. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.002
[63]  Kull CA (2000) Deforestation, erosion, and fire: degradation myths in the environmental history of Madagascar. Environment and History: 423–450.
[64]  Randrianarijaona P (1983) The erosion of Madagascar. Ambio: 308–311.
[65]  Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation. Journal of soil and Water Conservation 46: 30–33.
[66]  Roose E (1996) Land husbandry: components and strategy: FAO Rome.
[67]  Solonitompoarinony J (2000) Dommage hors site de l'érosion: les effets de l'ensablement sur la production rizicole. Etude de cas dans la Commune d'Ambohitrarivo. Antananarivo, Madagascar: MINEV, ONE, USAID, CFSIGE, PAGE, FAC DEGS.
[68]  Brand J, Minten B, Randrianarisoa J (2002) Etude d'impact de la Déforestation sur la Riziculture Irriguée: Cas de Petits Bassins Versants de Maroantsetra, Nord-Est Madagascar. Antananarivo, Madagascar: FOFIFA.
[69]  Bolte JP, Vache K (2010) Envisioning Puget Sound Alternative Futures. Oregon State University. 50 p.
[70]  Bourassa SC, Hoesli M, Sun J (2006) A simple alternative house price index method. Journal of Housing Economics 15: 80–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2006.03.001
[71]  McConnell V, Walls MA (2005) The value of open space: Evidence from studies of nonmarket benefits: Resources for the Future Washington, DC, USA.
[72]  Coulthard TJ (2013) CAESAR-Lisflood. Available: www.coulthard.org.uk/CAESARLisflood.html.
[73]  Leavesley G, Stannard L, Singh V (1995) The precipitation-runoff modeling system-PRMS. Computer models of watershed hydrology: 281–310.
[74]  Smith B, Samuelsson P, Wramneby A, Rummukainen M (2011) A model of the coupled dynamics of climate, vegetation and terrestrial ecosystem biogeochemistry for regional applications. Tellus A 63: 87–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00477.x
[75]  ARIES Consortium (2012) ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES). Available: www.ariesonline.org.
[76]  Jax K, Barton DN, Chan KMA, de Groot R, Doyle U, et al. (2013) Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecological Economics 93: 260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008
[77]  Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74: 8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
[78]  Poppy GM, Chiotha S, Eigenbrod F, Harvey C, Honzak M, et al.. (2013) Understanding food security in a perfect storm: an ecosystem services approach. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences Forthcoming.
[79]  Corbera E, Pascual U (2012) Ecosystem services: heed social goals. Science 335: 655–656. doi: 10.1126/science.335.6069.655-c
[80]  Farley J (2012) Ecosystem services: The economics debate. Ecosystem Services 1: 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002
[81]  McDermott M, Mahanty S, Schreckenberg K (2013) Examining equity: A multidimensional framework for assessing equity in payments for ecosystem services. Environmental Science and Policy 33: 416–427. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.006
[82]  Wegner G, Pascual U (2011) Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change 21: 492–504. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.008
[83]  Wilson MA, Hoehn JP (2006) Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: The state-of-the art and science. Ecological Economics 60: 335–342. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.08.015
[84]  Liu S, Portela R, Ghermandi A, Rao N, Wang X (2011) Environmental Benefit Transfers of Ecosystem Service Valuation. In: Wolanski E, McLusky DS, editors. Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science. New York: Elsevier.
[85]  Bateman I, Mace G, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K (2011) Economic Analysis for Ecosystem Service Assessments. Environmental and Resource Economics 48: 177–218. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9418-x
[86]  Ghermandi A, Nunes PALD (2013) A global map of coastal recreation values: Results from a spatially explicit meta-analysis. Ecological Economics 86: 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.006
[87]  Loomis JB (1992) The evolution of a more rigorous approach to benefit transfer: Benefit function transfer. Water Resources Research 28: 701–705. doi: 10.1029/91wr02596
[88]  Boumans R, Costanza R, Farley J, Wilson MA, Portela R, et al. (2002) Modeling the dynamics of the integrated earth system and the value of global ecosystem services using the GUMBO model. Ecological Economics 41: 529–560. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00098-8
[89]  Villa F, Ceroni M, Krivov S (2007) Intelligent databases assist transparent and sound economic valuation of ecosystem services. Environmental Management 39: 887–899. doi: 10.1007/s00267-006-0269-8
[90]  Villa F, Wilson M, de Groot R, Farber S, Costanza R, et al. (2002) Designing an integrated knowledge base to support ecosystem services valuation. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS 41: 445–456. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8009(02)00093-9
[91]  Earth Economics (2013) Ecosystem Valuation Toolkit. Online: esvaluation.org.
[92]  Farley J (2008) The Role of Prices in Conserving Critical Natural Capital. Conservation Biology 22: 1399–1408. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01090.x
[93]  Farley J, Schmitt F, Alvez J, de Freitas NR Jr (2012) How valuing nature can transform agriculture. Solutions 2: 64–73.
[94]  Bolte JP, Hulse DW, Gregory SV, Smith C (2007) Modeling biocomplexity – actors, landscapes and alternative futures. Environmental Modelling & Software 22: 570–579. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.033
[95]  Rodríguez JP, Beard TD Jr, Bennett EM, Cumming GS, Cork S, et al. (2006) Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11: 28.
[96]  Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Sharp R, et al.. (2011) InVEST 2.2.0 User’s Guide. Stanford University.
[97]  Miles L, Kapos V (2008) Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation: Global Land-Use Implications. Science 320: 1454–1455. doi: 10.1126/science.1155358
[98]  Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art. New York: Springer.
[99]  Villa F, Tunesi L, Agardy T (2002) Zoning marine protected areas through spatial multiple-criteria analysis: the case of the Asinara Island National Marine Reserve of Italy. Conservation Biology 16: 515–526. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.00425.x
[100]  Conservation International (2013) Future Climates: climate projections for assessing the conservation impacts of climate change. Online: futureclimates.conservation.org.
[101]  Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3) (2013) International Spring University on Ecosystem Services Modelling. Available: www.bc3research.org/springuniversity.
[102]  Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (1999) The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Stanford InfoLab.
[103]  Sch?gner JP, Brander L, Maes J, Hartje V (2013) Mapping ecosystem services' values: Current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Services 4: 33–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133