全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Discovering Pair-Wise Genetic Interactions: An Information Theory-Based Approach

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092310

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Phenotypic variation, including that which underlies health and disease in humans, results in part from multiple interactions among both genetic variation and environmental factors. While diseases or phenotypes caused by single gene variants can be identified by established association methods and family-based approaches, complex phenotypic traits resulting from multi-gene interactions remain very difficult to characterize. Here we describe a new method based on information theory, and demonstrate how it improves on previous approaches to identifying genetic interactions, including both synthetic and modifier kinds of interactions. We apply our measure, called interaction distance, to previously analyzed data sets of yeast sporulation efficiency, lipid related mouse data and several human disease models to characterize the method. We show how the interaction distance can reveal novel gene interaction candidates in experimental and simulated data sets, and outperforms other measures in several circumstances. The method also allows us to optimize case/control sample composition for clinical studies.

References

[1]  Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, et al. (2009) Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature 461: 747–753. doi: 10.1038/nature08494
[2]  Brem RB, Storey JD, Whittle J, Kruglyak L (2005) Genetic interactions between polymorphisms that affect gene expression in yeast. Nature 436: 701–703. doi: 10.1038/nature03865
[3]  Drees BL, Thorsson V, Carter GW, Rives AW, Raymond MZ, et al. (2005) Derivation of genetic interaction networks from quantitative phenotype data. Genome Biol 6: R38. Available: http://genomebiology.com/2005/6/4/R38. Accessed 19 July 2013.
[4]  Carter GW, Prinz S, Neou C, Shelby JP, Marzolf B, et al. (2007) Prediction of phenotype and gene expression for combinations of mutations. Mol Syst Biol 3: 96. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.10?38/msb4100137/full. Accessed 19 July 2013.
[5]  Carter GW, Dudley AM (2011) Systems Genetics and Complex Traits. In: Meyers RA, editor. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer. 9105–9124.
[6]  Zuk O, Hechter E, Sunyaev SR, Lander ES (2012) The mystery of missing heritability: Genetic interactions create phantom heritability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 1193–1198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119675109
[7]  Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ (2005) Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet 6: 95–108. doi: 10.1038/nrg1521
[8]  McCarthy MI, Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, Goldstein DB, Little J, et al. (2008) Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nat Rev Genet 9: 356–369. doi: 10.1038/nrg2344
[9]  Moore JH, Gilbert JC, Tsai CT, Chiang FT, Holden T, et al. (2006) A flexible computational framework for detecting, characterizing, and interpreting statistical patterns of epistasis in genetic studies of human disease susceptibility. J Theor Biol 241: 252–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.11.036
[10]  Chanda P, Sucheston L, Zhang A, Brazeau D, Freudenheim JL, et al. (2008) AMBIENCE: a novel approach and efficient algorithm for identifying informative genetic and environmental associations with complex phenotypes. Genetics 180: 1191–1210. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.088542
[11]  Ignac T, Sakhanenko N, Skupin A, Galas DJ (2012) New Methods for Finding Associations in Large Data Sets: Generalizing the Maximal Information Coefficient. Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Computational Systems Biology. Ulm. 39–42.
[12]  Ritchie MD, Hahn LW, Moore JH (2003) Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions in the presence of genotyping error, missing data, phenocopy, and genetic heterogeneity. Genet Epidemiol 24: 150–157. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10218
[13]  McGill W (1954) Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika 19: 97–116. doi: 10.1007/bf02289159
[14]  Jakulin A, Bratko I (2004) Testing the significance of attribute interactions. Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Machine Learning. Banaff. 409–416.
[15]  Tsujishita T (1995) On triple mutual information. Adv Appl Math 16: 269–274. doi: 10.1006/aama.1995.1013
[16]  Li M, Chen X, Li X, Ma B, Vitanyi PMB (2004) The Similarity Metric. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 50: 3250–3264. doi: 10.1109/tit.2004.838101
[17]  Gerke J, Lorenz K, Cohen B (2009) Genetic interactions between transcription factors cause natural variation in yeast. Science 323: 498–501. doi: 10.1126/science.1166426
[18]  Lorenz K, Cohen B (2012) Small- and large-effect quantitative trait locus interactions underlie variation in yeast sporulation efficiency. Genetics 192: 1123–1132. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.143107
[19]  Sakhanenko NA, Galas DJ (2010) Markov logic networks in the analysis of genetic data. J Comput Biol 17: 1491–1508. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2010.0044
[20]  Wang S, Yehya N, Schadt EE, Wang H, Drake TA, et al. (2006) Genetic and genomic analysis of a fat mass trait with complex inheritance reveals marked sex specificity. PLoS Genet 2: e15. Available: http://www.plosgenetics.org/article/info?%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.0020015. Accessed 6 June 2013.
[21]  Wang SS, Schadt EE, Wang H, Wang X, Ingram-Drake L, et al. (2007) Identification of pathways for atherosclerosis in mice: integration of quantitative trait locus analysis and global gene expression data. Circ Res 101: e11–30. Available: http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/1?01/3/e11.short. Accessed 19 July 2013.
[22]  Zhu Q, Ge D, Heinzen EL, Dickson SP, Urban TJ, et al. (2012) Prioritizing genetic variants for causality on the basis of preferential linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 91: 422–434. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.07.010
[23]  Tabangin ME, Woo JG, Martin LJ (2009) The effect of minor allele frequency on the likelihood of obtaining false positives. BMC Proc 3 Suppl 7: S41. Available: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/3?/S7/S41. Accessed 11 June 2013.
[24]  Gorlov IP, Gorlova OY, Sunyaev SR, Spitz MR, Amos CI (2008) Shifting paradigm of association studies: value of rare single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 82: 100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.09.006
[25]  Guthery SL, Salisbury B a, Pungliya MS, Stephens JC, Bamshad M (2007) The structure of common genetic variation in United States populations. Am J Hum Genet 81: 1221–1231. doi: 10.1086/522239
[26]  Li W, Reich J (2000) A Complete Enumeration and Classification of Two-Locus Disease Models. Hum Hered 50: 334–349. doi: 10.1159/000022939
[27]  Reshef DN, Reshef YA, Finucane HK, Grossman SR, McVean G, et al. (2011) Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science 334: 1518–1524. doi: 10.1126/science.1205438
[28]  Sakhanenko NA, Galas DJ (2011) Interaction information in the discretization of quantitive phenotype data. Proceeding of the 8th International Workshop on Computational Systems Biology. Zurich. 161–164.
[29]  Devlin B, Risch N (1995) A Comparison of Linkage Disequilibrium Measures for Fine-Scale Mappingitle. Genomics 29: 311–322. doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.9003

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133