全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

A Cognitive Ethology Study of First- and Third-Person Perspectives

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092696

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The aim of the present study was to test the cognitive ethology approach, which seeks to link cognitions and behaviours as they operate in everyday life with those studied in controlled lab-based investigations. Our test bed was the understanding of first-person and third-person perspectives, which in lab-based investigations have been defined in a diverse and multi-faceted manner. We hypothesized that because these lab-based investigations seek to connect with how first- and third-person perspective operates in everyday life, then either some of the divergent lab-based definitions are missing their mark or the everyday conceptualization of first- and third-person perspective is multi-faceted. Our investigation revealed the latter. By applying a cognitive ethology approach we were able to determine that a) peoples’ everyday understanding of perspective is diverse yet reliable, and b) a lab-based investigation that applies these diverse understandings in a controlled setting can accurately predict how people will perform. These findings provide a ‘proof of concept’ for the cognitive ethology approach. Moreover, the present data demonstrate that previous lab-based studies, that often had very different understandings of first- and third-person perspective, were each in and of themselves valid. That is, each is capturing part of a broader understanding of perspective in everyday life. Our results also revealed a novel social factor not included in traditional conceptualizations of first-person third-perspective, that of eye gaze, i.e., eye contact is equated strongly with first-person perspective and the lack of eye-contact with third-person perspective.

References

[1]  Craik FI, Lockhart RS (1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11(6): 671–684. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x
[2]  Giesbrecht B, Bischof WF, Kingstone A (2003) Visual masking during the attentional blink: Tests of the object substitution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29(1): 238–258. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.238
[3]  Godden DR, Baddeley AD (1980) When does context influence recognition memory? British Journal of Psychology 71: 99–104. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb02735.x
[4]  Enns JT, Lleras A (2008) What’s next? New evidence for prediction in human vision. Trends in Cognitive Science 12(9): 327–333. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.06.001
[5]  Klein RM (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends in cognitive sciences 4(4): 138–147. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01452-2
[6]  Ballard DH, Hayhoe MM, Pelz JB (1995) Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7(1): 66–80. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.1.66
[7]  Hayhoe M, Ballard D (2005) Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(4): 188–194. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.009
[8]  Land MF, Hayhoe M (2001) In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Research 41: 3559–3565. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00102-x
[9]  Land MF, Lee DN (1994) Where we look when we steer. Nature 369: 742–744. doi: 10.1038/369742a0
[10]  Land MF, McLeod P (2000) From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball. Nature Neuroscience 3: 1340–1345.
[11]  Glenberg AM (2010) Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. WIREs Cognitive Science 1: 586–596. doi: 10.1002/wcs.55
[12]  Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsh D (2000) Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2): 174–196. doi: 10.1145/353485.353487
[13]  Hutchins E (1995) Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[14]  Killeen PR, Glenberg AM (2010) Resituating cognition. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews 5: 59–77. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2010.50003
[15]  Wilson M (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(4): 625–636. doi: 10.3758/bf03196322
[16]  Broadbent DE (1991) A word before leaving. In: Meyer DE, Kornblum S, editors. Attention and performance XIV. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press. (pp. 863–879).
[17]  Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
[18]  Kingstone A (2009) Taking a real look at social attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 19: 52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2009.05.004
[19]  Kingstone A, Smilek D, Eastwood JD (2008) Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology 99: 317–345. doi: 10.1348/000712607x251243
[20]  Kingstone A, Smilek D, Ristic J, Friesen CK, Eastwood JD (2003) Attention, researchers! It’s time to pay attention to the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12: 176–180. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01255
[21]  Smilek D, Birmingham E, Cameron D, Bischof WF, Kingstone A (2006) Cognitive ethology and exploring attention in real world scenes. Brain Research 1080: 101–119. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.090
[22]  Birmingham E, Bischof WF, Kingstone A (2008a) Social attention and real world scenes: The roles of action, competition and social content. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61: 986–976. doi: 10.1080/17470210701410375
[23]  Birmingham E, Bischof WF, Kingstone A (2008b) Gaze selection in complex social scenes. Visual Cognition 15: 341–355. doi: 10.1080/13506280701434532
[24]  Itier RJ, Villate C, Ryan JD (2007) Eyes always attract attention but gaze orienting is task-dependent: Evidence from eye movement monitoring. Neuropsychologia 45: 1019–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.09.004
[25]  Levy J, Foulsham T, Kingstone A (2012) Monsters are people too. Biology Letters 9(1): 20120850. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0850
[26]  Foulsham T, Walker E, Kingstone A (2011) The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research 51: 1920–1931. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.002
[27]  Gallup AC, Chong A, Couzin ID (2012) The directional flow of visual information transfer between pedestrians. Biology Letters 8(4): 520–522. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0160
[28]  Gallup AC, Hale JJ, Sumpter DJT, Garnier S, Kacelnik A, et al. (2012) Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(19): 7245–7250. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116141109
[29]  Laidlaw KEW, Foulsham T, Kuhn G, Kingstone A (2011) Potential social interactions are important to social attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 5548–5553. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017022108
[30]  Epley N, Morewedge CK, Keysar B (2004) Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40: 760–768. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.002
[31]  Piaget J, Inhelder B (1956) The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge.
[32]  Borke H (1975) Piaget’s mountains revisited: Changes in the egocentric landscape. Developmental Psychology 11(2): 240–243. doi: 10.1037/h0076459
[33]  Marvin RS, Greenberg MT, Mossler DG (1976) The early development of conceptual perspective taking: Distinguishing among multiple perspectives. Child Development 47: 511–514. doi: 10.2307/1128810
[34]  Mossler DG, Marvin RS, Greenberg MT (1976) Conceptual perspective taking in 2- to 6-year-old children. Developmental Psychology 12(1): 85–86. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.12.1.85
[35]  Baron-Cohen S (2000) Theory of mind and autism: a 15-year review. In: Baron-Cohen S, Cohen D, Tager-Flusberg H, editors. Understanding other minds: perspectives from autism and developmental cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (pp. 3–20).
[36]  Premack D, Woodruff G (1978) Does the chimpanzee have theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1(4): 515–526. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x00076512
[37]  David N, Bewernick BH, Cohen MX, Newen A, Lux S, et al. (2006) Neural representations of self versus other: Visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball-tossing game. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(6): 898–910. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.898
[38]  Vogeley K, Bussfeld P, Newen A, Herrmann S, Happe F, et al. (2001) Mind reading: Neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. NeuroImage 14: 170–181. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0789
[39]  Nigro G, Neisser U (1983) Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology 15: 467–482. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90016-6
[40]  McIsaac HK, Eich E (2002) Vantage point in episodic memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9: 146–150. doi: 10.3758/bf03196271
[41]  Ruby P, Decety J (2001) Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience 4: 546–550.
[42]  Vogeley K, Fink GR (2003) Neural correlates of the first-person perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 38–42. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00003-7
[43]  Vogeley K, May M, Ritzl A, Falkai P, Zilles K, et al. (2004) Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16: 817–827. doi: 10.1162/089892904970799
[44]  Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424: 769–771. doi: 10.1038/nature01861
[45]  Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J (2006) Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. Neuroimage 31(1): 429–439. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.026
[46]  Tatler BW, Hirose Y, Finnegan SK, Pievilainen R, Kirtley C, et al. (2013) Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368: 20130066. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0066
[47]  Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN (1995) International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
[48]  Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th edition). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
[49]  Robinson JA, Swanson KL (1993) Field and observer modes of remembering. Memory 1(3): 169–184. doi: 10.1080/09658219308258230
[50]  McIsaac HK, Eich E (2004) Vantage Point in Traumatic Memory. Psychological Science 15: 248–253. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00660.x
[51]  McNamara P, Benson E, McGeeney B, Brown A, Albert ML (2005) Modes of remembering in patients with chronic pain: relation to current pain. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease 192(1): 53–57. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000149219.04841.f5
[52]  Clark DM, Wells A (1995) A Cognitive Model of Social Phobia. In: Hemiberg RG, Liebowitz MR, Hope DA, F. R Schneier, editors. Social phobia: Diagnosis assessment and treatment. New York: Guilford Press. (pp. 69–93).
[53]  Coles ME, Turk CL, Heimberg RG, Fresco DM (2001) Effects of varying levels of anxiety within social situations: relationship to memory perspective and attributions in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Psychotherapy 39: 651–665. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00035-8
[54]  Spurr JM, Stopa L (2003) The observer perspective: Effects on social anxiety and performance. Behaviour Research and Therapy 41: 1009–1028. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00177-8

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133