全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

The Role of Social Media in Recruiting for Clinical Trials in Pregnancy

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092744

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background Recruitment of women in the periconceptional period to clinical studies using traditional advertising through medical establishments is difficult and slow. Given the widespread use of the internet as a source for medical information and research, we analyze the impact of social media in the second phase of an ongoing randomized, open-label clinical trial among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of social media as a recruitment tool through the comparison of diverse recruitment techniques in two different phases of the trial. Methods Recruitment in Phase 1 of the study consisted solely of traditional healthcare-based sources. This was compared to Phase 2 of the study where traditional recruitment was continued and expanded, while social media was used as a supplementary source. Yearly recruitment and recruitment rates in the two phases were compared using the Mann Whitney U test. The contributions of each recruitment source to overall recruitment were analyzed, and the impact of potential confounders on recruitment rate was evaluated using a multiple regression and Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Results In the first phase of the study, with over 56 months of recruitment using traditional sources, 35 women were enrolled in the study, resulting in a mean rate of ±0.62 recruits/month. In the 6 months implementing recruitment through social media, 45 women were recruited, for a 12-fold higher rate of ±7.5 recruits/month. Attrition rates remained constant, suggesting that social media had a positive impact on recruitment. The Interrupted Time Series Analysis detected a significant difference in recruitment after the intervention of social media (p<0.0001) with an evident increase in the number of recruits observed after the use of social media. Conclusions Clinicians and scientists recruiting for clinical studies should learn how to use online social media platforms to improve recruitment rates, thus increasing recruitment efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

References

[1]  Watson JM, Torgerson DJ (2006) Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 6: 34.
[2]  Tooher RL, Middleton PF, Crowther CA (2008) A thematic analysis of factors influencing recruitment to maternal and perinatal trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 8: 36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-8-36
[3]  Mapstone J, Elbourne D, Roberts I (2007) Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: MR000013.
[4]  Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J, Kjeldstrom M, Taskila T, et al.. (2010) Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: MR000013.
[5]  Kenyon S, Dixon-Woods M, Jackson CJ, Windridge K, Pitchforth E (2006) Participating in a trial in a critical situation: a qualitative study in pregnancy. Qual Saf Health Care 15: 98–101.
[6]  Omurtag K, Jimenez PT, Ratts V, Odem R, Cooper AR (2012) The ART of social networking: how SART member clinics are connecting with patients online. Fertil Steril 97: 88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.10.001
[7]  Hughes A (2010) Using Social Media Platforms to Amplify Public Health Messages: An Examination of Tenets and Best Practices for Communicating with Key Audiences. Oglivy Washington & The Center for Social Impact Communication at Georgetown University: 1–26.
[8]  Elkin N (2008) How America Searches: Health and Wellness. Opinion Research Corporation: iCrossing: 1–17.
[9]  Pyper C, Bromhall L, Dummett S, Altman DG, Brownbill P, et al. (2006) The Oxford Conception Study design and recruitment experience. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 20 Suppl 151–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00771.x
[10]  Velott DL, Baker SA, Hillemeier MM, Weisman CS (2008) Participant recruitment to a randomized trial of a community-based behavioral intervention for pre- and interconceptional women findings from the Central Pennsylvania Women’s Health Study. Womens Health Issues 18: 217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.002

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133