全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

A Cell-Regulatory Mechanism Involving Feedback between Contraction and Tissue Formation Guides Wound Healing Progression

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092774

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Wound healing is a process driven by cells. The ability of cells to sense mechanical stimuli from the extracellular matrix that surrounds them is used to regulate the forces that cells exert on the tissue. Stresses exerted by cells play a central role in wound contraction and have been broadly modelled. Traditionally, these stresses are assumed to be dependent on variables such as the extracellular matrix and cell or collagen densities. However, we postulate that cells are able to regulate the healing process through a mechanosensing mechanism regulated by the contraction that they exert. We propose that cells adjust the contraction level to determine the tissue functions regulating all main activities, such as proliferation, differentiation and matrix production. Hence, a closed-regulatory feedback loop is proposed between contraction and tissue formation. The model consists of a system of partial differential equations that simulates the evolution of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, collagen and a generic growth factor, as well as the deformation of the extracellular matrix. This model is able to predict the wound healing outcome without requiring the addition of phenomenological laws to describe the time-dependent contraction evolution. We have reproduced two in vivo experiments to evaluate the predictive capacity of the model, and we conclude that there is feedback between the level of cell contraction and the tissue regenerated in the wound.

References

[1]  Singer A, Clark R (1999) Mechanisms of disease - cutaneous wound healing. New England Journal of Medicine 341: 738–746. doi: 10.1056/nejm199909023411006
[2]  Li J, Chen J, Kirsner R (2007) Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clinics in dermatology 25: 9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.007
[3]  Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT (2008) Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453: 314–321. doi: 10.1038/nature07039
[4]  Vaughan M, Howard E, Tomasek J (2000) Transforming growth factor-beta 1 promotes the morphological and functional differentiation of the myofibroblast. Experimental cell research 257: 180–189. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.4869
[5]  Wells RG (2008) The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology 47: 1394–1400. doi: 10.1002/hep.22193
[6]  Discher D, Janmey P, Wang Y (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310: 1139–1143. doi: 10.1126/science.1116995
[7]  Engler A, Griffin M, Sen S, Bonnetnann C, Sweeney H, et al. (2004) Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. Journal of Cell Biology 166: 877–887. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200405004
[8]  Harland B, Walcott S, Sun SX (2011) Adhesion dynamics and durotaxis in migrating cells. Physical Biology 8: 015011. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/8/1/015011
[9]  Lo C, Wang H, Dembo M, Wang Y (2000) Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophysical journal 79: 144–152. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76279-5
[10]  Saez A, Ghibaudo M, Buguin A, Silberzan P, Ladoux B (2007) Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 8281–8286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702259104
[11]  Serra-Picamal X, Conte V, Vincent R, Anon E, Tambe DT, et al. (2012) Mechanical waves during tissue expansion. Nature Physics 8: 628–634. doi: 10.1038/nphys2355
[12]  Vogel V, Sheetz M (2006) Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 7: 265–275. doi: 10.1038/nrm1890
[13]  Borau C, Kim T, Bidone T, Garcia-Aznar JM, Kamm RD (2012) Dynamic mechanisms of cell rigidity sensing: Insights from a computational model of actomyosin networks. Plos One 7: e49174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049174
[14]  Jones C, Ehrlich HP (2011) Fibroblast expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin, alpha 2 beta 1 integrin and alpha v beta 3 integrin: Influence of surface rigidity. Experimental and molecular pathology 91: 394–399. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2011.04.007
[15]  Mitrossilis D, Fouchard J, Guiroy A, Desprat N, Rodriguez N, et al. (2009) Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 18243–18248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903994106
[16]  Mitrossilis D, Fouchard J, Pereira D, Postic F, Richert A, et al. (2010) Real-time single-cell response to stiffness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 16518–16523. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1007940107
[17]  Pelham R, Wang Y (1997) Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 94: 13661–13665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13661
[18]  Adam J (2000) A simplified model of wound healing (with particular reference to the critical size defect) (vol 30, pg 23, 1999). Mathematical and Computer Modelling 31: 237–237. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7177(00)00054-6
[19]  Murray JD, Cook J, Tyson R, Lubkin SR (1998) Spatial pattern formation in biology: I. dermal wound healing. ii. bacterial patterns. Journal of the Franklin Institute-Engineering and Applied Mathematics 335B: 303–332. doi: 10.1016/s0016-0032(97)00034-3
[20]  Sherratt J, Murray J (1991) Mathematical-analysis of a basic model for epidermal wound-healing. Journal of mathematical biology 29: 389–404. doi: 10.1007/bf00160468
[21]  Olsen L, Sherratt JA, Maini PK (1995) A mechanochemical model for adult dermal wound contraction and the permanence of the contracted tissue displacement profile. Journal of theoretical biology 177: 113–128. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1995.0230
[22]  Olsen L, Sherratt JA, Maini PK (1996) A mathematical model for fibro-proliferative wound healing disorders. Bulletin of mathematical biology 58: 787–808. doi: 10.1007/bf02459482
[23]  Javierre E, Moreo P, Doblare M, Garcia-Aznar JM (2009) Numerical modeling of a mechanochemical theory for wound contraction analysis. International Journal of Solids and Structures 46: 3597–3606. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.06.010
[24]  Murphy KE, Hall CL, McCue SW, McElwain DLS (2011) A two-compartment mechanochemical model of the roles of transforming growth factor beta and tissue tension in dermal wound healing. Journal of theoretical biology 272: 145–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.12.011
[25]  Murphy KE, Hall CL, Maini PK, McCue SW, McElwain DLS (2012) A fibrocontractive mechanochemical model of dermal wound closure incorporating realistic growth factor kinetics. Bulletin of mathematical biology 74: 1143–1170. doi: 10.1007/s11538-011-9712-y
[26]  Tranquillo R, Murray J (1992) Continuum model of fibroblast-driven wound contraction - inflammation-mediation. Journal of theoretical biology 158: 135. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80715-5
[27]  Ghosh K, Pan Z, Guan E, Ge S, Liu Y, et al. (2007) Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ecm mimic with different viscoelastic properties. Biomaterials 28: 671–679. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.09.038
[28]  Moreo P, Garcia-Aznar JM, Doblare M (2008) Modeling mechanosensing and its effect on the migration and proliferation of adherent cells rid f-8256-2010. Acta Biomaterialia 4: 613–621. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.10.014
[29]  Hinz B, Gabbiani G (2003) Mechanisms of force generation and transmission by myofibroblasts. Current opinion in biotechnology 14: 538–546. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2003.08.006
[30]  Grinnell F (2000) Fibroblast-collagen-matrix contraction: growth-factor signalling and mechanical loading. Trends in cell biology 10: 362–365. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01802-x
[31]  Tomasek J, Gabbiani G, Hinz B, Chaponnier C, Brown R (2002) Myofibroblasts and mechanoregulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 3: 349–363. doi: 10.1038/nrm809
[32]  Arora P, Narani N, McCulloch C (1999) The compliance of collagen gels regulates transforming growth factor-beta induction of alpha-smooth muscle actin in fibroblasts. American Journal of Pathology 154: 871–882. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)65334-5
[33]  Hinz B, Mastrangelo D, Iselin C, Chaponnier C, Gabbiani G (2001) Mechanical tension controls granulation tissue contractile activity and myofibroblast differentiation. American Journal of Pathology 159: 1009–1020. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61776-2
[34]  Roy S, Biswas S, Khanna S, Gordillo G, Bergdall V, et al. (2009) Characterization of a preclinical model of chronic ischemic wound. Physiological Genomics 37: 211–224. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90362.2008
[35]  McGrath M, Simon R (1983) Wound geometry and the kinetics of wound contraction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 72: 66–72. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198307000-00015
[36]  Reina-Romo E, Gomez-Benito MJ, Garcia-Aznar JM, Dominguez J, Doblare M (2010) An interspecies computational study on limb lengthening. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part H-Journal of Engineering in Medicine 224: 1245–1256.
[37]  Bidan CM, Kommareddy KP, Rumpler M, Kollmannsberger P, Brechet YJM, et al. (2012) How linear tension converts to curvature: Geometric control of bone tissue growth. Plos One 7: e36336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036336
[38]  Radovanac K, Morgner J, Schulz JN, Blumbach K, Patterson C, et al. (2013) Stabilization of integrin-linked kinase by the hsp90-chip axis impacts cellular force generation, migration and the fibrotic response. Embo Journal 32: 1409–1424. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2013.90
[39]  Bluestein D, Javaheri A (2008) Pressure ulcers: Prevention, evaluation, and management. American Family Physician 78: 1186–1194.
[40]  Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG (2011) Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: Pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Molecular Medicine 17: 113–125.
[41]  Aarabi S, Bhatt KA, Shi Y, Paterno J, Chang EI, et al. (2007) Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis. Faseb Journal 21: 3250–3261. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8218com
[42]  Ogawa R (2011) Mechanobiology of scarring. Wound Repair and Regeneration 19: S2–S9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2011.00707.x
[43]  Guidry C (1992) Extracellular-matrix contraction by fibroblasts - peptide promoters and 2nd messengers. Cancer and metastasis reviews 11: 45–54. doi: 10.1007/bf00047602
[44]  Grinnell F (1994) Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction. Journal of Cell Biology 124: 401–404. doi: 10.1083/jcb.124.4.401
[45]  Chiquet M, Reneda A, Huber F, Fluck M (2003) How do fibroblasts translate mechanical signals into changes in extracellular matrix production? Matrix Biology 22: 73–80. doi: 10.1016/s0945-053x(03)00004-0
[46]  Grinnell F (2003) Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Trends in cell biology 13: 264–269. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(03)00057-6
[47]  Grotendorst G, Seppa H, Kleinman H, Martin G (1981) Attachment of smooth-muscle cells to collagen and their migration toward platelet-derived growth-factor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America-Biological Sciences 78: 3669–3672. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3669
[48]  Desmouliere A, Redard M, Darby I, Gabbiani G (1995) Apoptosis mediates the decrease in cellularity during the transition between granulation-tissue and scar. American Journal of Pathology 146: 56–66.
[49]  Serini G, Gabbiani G (1999) Mechanisms of myofibroblast activity and phenotypic modulation. Experimental cell research 250: 273–283. doi: 10.1006/excr.1999.4543
[50]  Roberts A, Sporn M, Assoian R, Smith J, Roche N, et al. (1986) Transforming growth factor type beta: rapid induction of fibrosis and angiogenesis in vivo and stimulation of collagen formation in vitro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 83: 4167–4171. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.12.4167
[51]  Khatyr F, Imberdis C, Vescovo P, Varchon D, Lagarde JM (2004) Model of the viscoelastic behaviour of skin in vivo and study of anisotropy. Skin Research and Technology 10: 96–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00057.x

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133