Neurological glutamate receptors bind a variety of artificial ligands, both agonistic and antagonistic, in addition to glutamate. Studying their small molecule binding properties increases our understanding of the central nervous system and a variety of associated pathologies. The large, oligomeric multidomain membrane protein contains a large and flexible ligand binding domains which undergoes large conformational changes upon binding different ligands. A recent application of glutamate receptors is their activation or inhibition via photo-switchable ligands, making them key systems in the emerging field of optochemical genetics. In this work, we present a theoretical study on the binding mode and complex stability of a novel photo-switchable ligand, ATA-3, which reversibly binds to glutamate receptors ligand binding domains (LBDs). We propose two possible binding modes for this ligand based on flexible ligand docking calculations and show one of them to be analogues to the binding mode of a similar ligand, 2-BnTetAMPA. In long MD simulations, it was observed that transitions between both binding poses involve breaking and reforming the T686-E402 protein hydrogen bond. Simulating the ligand photo-isomerization process shows that the two possible configurations of the ligand azo-group have markedly different complex stabilities and equilibrium binding modes. A strong but slow protein response is observed after ligand configuration changes. This provides a microscopic foundation for the observed difference in ligand activity upon light-switching.
References
[1]
Dingledine R, Borges K, Bowie D, Traynelis SF (1999) The Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels. Pharmacological Reviews 51: 7–62. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.002451
[2]
Asztely F, Gustafsson B (1996) Ionotropic glutamate receptors - Their possible role in the expression of hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Mol Neurobiol 12: 1–11. doi: 10.1007/bf02740744
[3]
Lodge D (2009) The history of the pharmacology and cloning of ionotropic glutamate receptors and the development of idiosyncratic nomenclature. Neuropharmacology 56: 6–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.08.006
[4]
Collingridge GL, Olsen RW, Peters J, Spedding M (2009) A nomenclature for ligand-gated ion channels. Neuropharmacology 56: 2–5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.06.063
[5]
Sobolevsky A, Rosconi M, Gouaux E (2009) X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor. Nature 462: 745–756. doi: 10.1038/nature08624
[6]
Armstrong N, Gouaux E (2000) Mechanisms for Activation and Antagonism of an AMPA-Sensitive Glutamate Receptor:: Crystal Structures of the GluR2 Ligand Binding Core. Neuron 28: 165–181. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00094-5
[7]
Arvola M, Kein？nen K (1996) Characterization of the ligand-binding domains of glutamate receptor (glur)-b and glur-d subunits expressed in escherichia coli as periplasmic proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271: 15527–15532. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.26.15527
[8]
Stawski P, Sumser M, Trauner D (2012) A Photochromic Agonist of AMPA Receptors. Angew Chem Int Edit 51: 5748–5751. doi: 10.1002/anie.201109265
[9]
Trott O, Olson AJ (2009) AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334
[10]
Knegtel R, Kuntz ID, Oshiro CM (1997) Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. Journal of Molecular Biology 266: 424–440. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0776
[11]
Vogensen S, Frydenvang K, Greenwood J, Postorino G, Nielsen B, et al. (2007) A Tetrazolyl- Substituted Subtype-Selective AMPA Receptor Agonist. J Med Chem 50: 2408–2414. doi: 10.1021/jm061439q
[12]
Jin R, Banke T, Mayer M, Traynelis S, Gouaux E (2003) Structural basis for partial agonist action at ionotropic glutamate receptors. Nat Neurosci 6: 803–810. doi: 10.1038/nn1091
[13]
Wolter T, Steinbrecher T, Elstner M (2013) Computational Study of Synthetic Agonist Ligands of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptors. PLoS ONE 8: e58774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058774
[14]
Lau A, Roux B (2007) The free energy landscapes governing conformational changes in a glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain. Structure doi: 10.1016/j.str.2007.07.015
[15]
Lau AY, Roux B (2011) The hidden energetics of ligand binding and activation in a glutamate receptor. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 283–287. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2010
[16]
Arinaminpathy Y, Sansom M, Biggin P (2006) Binding site exibility: Molecular simulation of partial and full agonists within a glutamate receptor. Mol Pharmacol 69: 5–12. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.016691
[17]
Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D (2008) GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load- Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 4: 435–447. doi: 10.1021/ct700301q
[18]
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water. J Chem Phys 79: 926–935. doi: 10.1063/1.445869
[19]
Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, et al. (2006) Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65: 712–725. doi: 10.1002/prot.21123
[20]
Wang J, Wolf R, Caldwell J, Kollman P, Case D (2004) Development and testing of a general amber force field. J Comput Chem 25: 1157–1174. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20035
[21]
Nosé S (1984) A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Molecular Physics 52: 255–268. doi: 10.1080/00268978400101201
[22]
Hoover W (1985) Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Physical Review A 31: 1695–1697. doi: 10.1103/physreva.31.1695
[23]
Parrinello M, RAHMAN A (1981) Polymorphic Transitions in Single-Crystals - a New Molecular-Dynamics Method. J Appl Phys 52: 7182–7190. doi: 10.1063/1.328693
[24]
Nguyen P, Stock G (2006) Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulation of a photoswitchable peptide. Chemical Physics 323: 36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.08.047
