Human voice is a gender discriminating cue and is important to mate selection. This study employed electrophysiological recordings to examine whether there is specific cerebral activity when presented with opposite-sex voices as compared to same-sex voices. Male voices and female voices were pseudo-randomly presented to male and female participants. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to determine the gender of each voice. A late positivity (LP) response around 750 ms after voice onset was elicited by opposite-sex voices, as reflected by a positive deflection of the ERP to opposite-sex voices than that to same-sex voices. This LP response was prominent around parieto-occipital recording sites, and it suggests an opposite-sex specific process, which may reflect emotion- and/or reward-related cerebral activity. In Experiment 2, participants were instructed to press a key when hearing a non-voice pure tone and not give any response when they heard voice stimuli. In this task, no difference were found between the ERP to same-sex voices and that to opposite-sex voices, suggesting that the cerebral activity to opposite-sex voices may disappear without gender-related attention. These results provide significant implications on cognitive mechanisms with regard to opposite-sex specific voice processing.
References
[1]
Grammer K, Fink B, Moller AP, Thornhill R (2003) Darwinian aesthetics: sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 78: 385–407. doi: 10.1017/s1464793102006085
[2]
Aharon I, Etcoff N, Ariely D, Chabris CF, O'Connor E, et al. (2001) Beautiful faces have variable reward value: fMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron 32: 537–551. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00491-3
[3]
Kranz F, Ishai A (2006) Face perception is modulated by sexual preference. Current Biology 16: 63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.070
[4]
Proverbio AM, Riva F, Martin E, Zani A (2010) Neural markers of opposite-sex bias in face processing. Front Psychol 1: 169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00169
[5]
Apicella CL, Feinberg DR (2009) Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter-gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276: 1077–1082. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1542
[6]
Hodges-Simeon CR, Gaulin SJC, Puts DA (2011) Voice Correlates of Mating Success in Men: Examining “Contests” Versus “Mate Choice” Modes of Sexual Selection. Archives of Sexual Behavior 40: 551–557. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9625-0
[7]
Sokhi DS, Hunter MD, Wilkinson ID, Woodruff PW (2005) Male and female voices activate distinct regions in the male brain. Neuroimage 27: 572–578. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.023
[8]
Lattner S, Meyer ME, Friederici AD (2005) Voice perception: Sex, pitch, and the right hemisphere. Hum Brain Mapp 24: 11–20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20065
[9]
Junger J, Pauly K, Brohr S, Birkholz P, Neuschaefer-Rube C, et al. (2013) Sex matters: Neural correlates of voice gender perception. Neuroimage 79: 275–287. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.105
[10]
Levy DA, Granot R, Bentin S (2001) Processing specificity for human voice stimuli: electrophysiological evidence. Neuroreport 12: 2653–2657. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200108280-00013
[11]
Levy DA, Granot R, Bentin S (2003) Neural sensitivity to human voices: ERP evidence of task and attentional influences. Psychophysiology 40: 291–305. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00031
[12]
Jones BC, Feinberg DR, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Vukovic J (2010) A domain-specific opposite-sex bias in human preferences for manipulated voice pitch. Animal Behaviour 79: 57–62. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.003
[13]
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
[14]
Semlitsch HV, Anderer P, Schuster P, Presslich O (1986) A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology 23: 695–703. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
[15]
Maris E, Oostenveld R (2007) Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 164: 177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
[16]
Werheid K, Schacht A, Sommer W (2007) Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials. Biol Psychol 76: 100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.06.008
[17]
Eimer M, Holmes A (2007) Event-related brain potential correlates of emotional face processing. Neuropsychologia 45: 15–31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.022
[18]
Dolcos F, Cabeza R (2000) Event-related potentials of emotional memory: Encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience: 55–55.
[19]
Warren CA, McDonough BE (1999) Event-related brain potentials as indicators of smoking cue-reactivity. Clinical Neurophysiology 110: 1570–1584. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00089-9
[20]
Littel M, Franken IHA (2007) The effects of prolonged abstinence on the processing of smoking cues: an ERP study among smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers. Journal of Psychopharmacology 21: 873–882. doi: 10.1177/0269881107078494
[21]
Franken IHA, Stam CJ, Hendriks VM, van den Brink W (2003) Neurophysiological evidence for abnormal cognitive processing of drug cues in heroin dependence. Psychopharmacology 170: 205–212. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1542-7
[22]
Zhang X, Salmeron BJ, Ross TJ, Gu H, Geng X, et al. (2011) Anatomical differences and network characteristics underlying smoking cue reactivity. Neuroimage 54: 131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.063
[23]
Hofmann SG, Suvak M, Litz BT (2006) Sex differences in face recognition and influence of facial affect. Personality and Individual Differences 40: 1683–1690. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.014
[24]
Cornwell RE, Boothroyd L, Burt DM, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, et al. (2004) Concordant preferences for opposite-sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 271: 635–640. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2649
[25]
Hornak J, Bramham J, Rolls ET, Morris RG, O'Doherty J, et al. (2003) Changes in emotion after circumscribed surgical lesions of the orbitofrontal and cingulate cortices. Brain 126: 1691–1712. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg168
[26]
Wu K, Childers DG (1991) Gender recognition from speech. Part I: Coarse analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 90: 1828–1840. doi: 10.1121/1.401663
[27]
Pernet CR, Belin P (2012) The role of pitch and timbre in voice gender categorization. Front Psychol 3: 23. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00023
[28]
Latinus M, Taylor MJ (2012) Discriminating male and female voices: differentiating pitch and gender. Brain Topogr 25: 194–204. doi: 10.1007/s10548-011-0207-9
[29]
Charest I, Pernet C, Latinus M, Crabbe F, Belin P (2013) Cerebral Processing of Voice Gender Studied Using a Continuous Carryover fMRI Design. Cerebral Cortex 23: 958–966. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs090
[30]
Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Lafaille P, Ahad P, Pike B (2000) Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex. Nature 403: 309–312. doi: 10.1038/35002078
[31]
Ethofer T, Wiethoff S, Anders S, Kreifelts B, Grodd W, et al. (2007) The voices of seduction: cross-gender effects in processing of erotic prosody. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2: 334–337. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm028
[32]
Latinus M, VanRullen R, Taylor MJ (2010) Top-down and bottom-up modulation in processing bimodal face/voice stimuli. BMC Neurosci 11: 36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-36
[33]
de Gelder B, Pourtois G, Weiskrantz L (2002) Fear recognition in the voice is modulated by unconsciously recognized facial expressions but not by unconsciously recognized affective pictures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 4121–4126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.062018499
[34]
Vroomen J, Driver J, de Gelder B (2001) Is cross-modal integration of emotional expressions independent of attentional resources? Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 1: 382–387. doi: 10.3758/cabn.1.4.382
