Phase-Contrast MRI (PC-MRI) is a noninvasive technique to measure blood flow. In particular, global but highly quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurement using PC-MRI complements several other CBF mapping methods such as arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by providing a calibration factor. The ability to estimate blood supply in physiological units also lays a foundation for assessment of brain metabolic rate. However, a major obstacle before wider applications of this method is that the slice positioning of the scan, ideally placed perpendicular to the feeding arteries, requires considerable expertise and can present a burden to the operator. In the present work, we proposed that the majority of PC-MRI scans can be positioned using an automatic algorithm, leaving only a small fraction of arteries requiring manual positioning. We implemented and evaluated an algorithm for this purpose based on feature extraction of a survey angiogram, which is of minimal operator dependence. In a comparative test-retest study with 7 subjects, the blood flow measurement using this algorithm showed an inter-session coefficient of variation (CoV) of . The Bland-Altman method showed that the automatic method differs from the manual method by between and , for of the CBF measurements. This is comparable to the variance in CBF measurement using manually-positioned PC MRI alone. In a further application of this algorithm to 157 consecutive subjects from typical clinical cohorts, the algorithm provided successful positioning in 89.7% of the arteries. In 79.6% of the subjects, all four arteries could be planned using the algorithm. Chi-square tests of independence showed that the success rate was not dependent on the age or gender, but the patients showed a trend of lower success rate (p = 0.14) compared to healthy controls. In conclusion, this automatic positioning algorithm could improve the application of PC-MRI in CBF quantification.
References
[1]
Haccke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R (1999) MR Angiography and Flow Quantification. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss.
[2]
Bakker CJ, Hoogeveen RM, Viergever MA (1999) Construction of a protocol for measuring blood flow by two-dimensional phase-contrast MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 9: 119–127. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2586(199901)9:1<119::aid-jmri16>3.0.co;2-f
[3]
Evans AJ, Iwai F, Grist TA, Sostman HD, Hedlund LW, et al. (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging of blood flow with a phase subtraction technique. in vitro and in vivo validation. Invest Radiol 28: 109–115. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199302000-00004
[4]
Zananiri FV, Jackson PC, Goddard PR, Davies ER, Wells PN (1991) An evaluation of the accuracy of flow measurements using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Med Eng Technol 15: 170–176. doi: 10.3109/03091909109023704
[5]
Aslan S, Xu F, Wang PL, Uh J, Yezhuvath US, et al. (2010) Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 63: 765–771. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22245
[6]
Bonekamp D, Degaonkar M, Barker PB (2011) Quantitative cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrastMRI using total cerebral flow from phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Magn Reson Med 66: 57–66. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22776
[7]
Poels MM, Ikram MA, Vernooij MW, Krestin GP, Hofman A, et al. (2008) Total cerebral blood flow in relation to cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28: 1652–1655. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.62
[8]
Varela M, Groves AM, Arichi T, Hajnal JV (2012) Mean cerebral blood flow measurements using phase contrast MRI in the first year of life. NMR Biomed 25: 1063–1072. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2771
[9]
Vernooij MW, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA, Wielopolski PA, Vrooman HA, et al. (2008) Total cerebral blood flow and total brain perfusion in the general population: the Rotterdam Scan Study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 28: 412–419. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600526
[10]
Xu F, Ge Y, Lu H (2009) Noninvasive quantification of whole-brain cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) by MRI. Magn Reson Med 62: 141–148. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21994
[11]
Liu P, Xu F, Lu H (2013) Test-retest reproducibility of a rapid method to measure brain oxygen metabolism. Magn Reson Med 69: 675–681. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24295
[12]
Jain V, Langham M, Wehrli F (2010) Mri estimation of global brain oxygen consumption rate. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30: 1598–1607. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.49
[13]
Fan A, Benner T, Bolar D, Rosen B, Adalsteinsson E (2012) Phase-based regional oxygen metabolism (prom) using mri. Magn Reson Med 67: 669–678. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23050
[14]
Bolar D, Rosen B, Sorensen A, Adalsteinsson E (2011) Quantitative imaging of extraction of oxygen and tissue consumption (quixotic) using venular-targeted velocity-selective spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 66: 1550–1562. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22946
[15]
Rodgers Z, Jain V, Englund E, Langham M, Wehrli F (2013) High temporal resolution mri quantification of global cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption in response to apneic challenge. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 33: 1514–1522. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.110
[16]
Weber E, Vilensky J, Carmichael S (2009) Head and Neck. Netter’s Concise Radiologic Anatomy. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Elsevier Health Sciencesl.
[17]
Otsu N (1979) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9: 62–66. doi: 10.1109/tsmc.1979.4310076
[18]
Dasgupta S, Papadimitriou C, Vazirani U (2006) Algorithms. McGraw-Hill.
[19]
Bland J, Altman D (2007) Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 17: 571–582. doi: 10.1080/10543400701329422
[20]
Bland J, Altman D (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8: 135–160. doi: 10.1191/096228099673819272
[21]
Bremmer J, van Berckel B, Persoon S, Kappelle LJ, Lammertsma A, et al. (2011) Day-to-day testretest variability of cbf, cmro2, and oef measurements using dynamic 15o pet studies. Molecular Imaging and Biology 13: 759–768. doi: 10.1007/s11307-010-0382-1
[22]
Petersena E, Mouridsena K, Golay X (2010) The quasar reproducibility study, part ii: Results from a multi-center arterial spin labeling testretest study. NeuroImage 49: 104–113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.068
[23]
Ainslie P, Cotter J, George K, Lucas S, Murrell C, et al. (2008) Elevation in cerebral blood flow velocity with aerobic fitness throughout healthy human ageing. The Journal of Physiology 586: 4005–4010. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.158279
[24]
Kochanowicz J, Mariak Z, Rutkowski R, Turek G, Lyson T, et al. (2009) Age and sex dependency of blood flow velocity in the internal carotid artery. Neurol Neurochir Pol 43: 3–8. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20502
