全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Prickly Poppies Can Get Pricklier: Ontogenetic Patterns in the Induction of Physical Defense Traits

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096796

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Plant ontogeny is a common source of variation in defense and herbivory. Yet, few studies have investigated how the induction of physical defense traits changes across plant ontogeny. Physical defense traits are costly to produce, and thus, it was predicted that induction as a cost-saving strategy would be particularly favorable for seedlings, leading to ontogenetic declines in the inducibility of these traits. We tested for induction of three different physical defense traits (prickles, latex and leaf toughness) in response to mechanical defoliation and jasmonic acid application using prickly poppies (Argemone glauca and A. mexicana, Papaveraceae) as a model system. Genetic variation in the induction of physical defenses was tested using maternal sib-ships sampled from multiple populations. Both species induced higher densities of laminar prickles, although the magnitude of induction was much higher in the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy, A. glauca, than in the cosmopolitan A. mexicana. The magnitude of prickle induction was also higher in young compared to older juvenile plant stages in A. glauca, demonstrating a strong role of ontogeny. Neither latex exudation nor leaf toughness was induced in either species. Although significant genetic variation was detected within and among populations for constitutive expression of physical defense traits in Argemone, there was no evidence for genetic variation in the induction of these traits. This study provides the first evidence for the induction of physical defenses in prickly poppies, emphasizing how an ontogenetically explicit framework can reveal new insights into plant defense. Moreover, this study illustrates how sister species comparisons between island vs. continental plants can provide new insights into plant functional and evolutionary ecology, highlighting a fruitful area for future research on more species pairs.

References

[1]  Barton KE, Koricheva J (2010) The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis. American Naturalist 175: 481–493. doi: 10.1086/650722
[2]  Quintero C, Barton KE, Boege K (2013) The ontogeny of plant indirect defenses. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 15: 245–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2013.08.003
[3]  Boege K, Marquis RJ (2005) Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 441–448. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.001
[4]  Swihart RK, Bryant JP (2001) Importance of biogeography and ontogeny of woody plants in winter herbivory by mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 82: 1–21. doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082<0001:iobaoo>2.0.co;2
[5]  Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology 67: 283–335. doi: 10.1086/417659
[6]  Koricheva J, Barton KE (2012) Temporal changes in plant secondary metabolite production: patterns, causes and consequences. In: Iason GR, Dicke M, Hartley SE, editors. The Ecology of Plant Secondary Metabolites. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10–33.
[7]  Massad TJ (2013) Ontogenetic differences of herbivory on woody and herbaceous plants: a meta-analysis demonstrating unique effects of herbivory on the young and the old, the slow and the fast. Oecologia 172: 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2470-1
[8]  Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[9]  Schaller A, editor (2010) Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory. Netherlands: Springer. 480 p.
[10]  Pigliucci M (1998) Developmental phenotypic plasticity: where internal programming meets the external environment. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1: 87–91. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(98)80133-7
[11]  Boege K (2005) Influence of plant ontogeny on compensation to leaf damage. American Journal of Botany 92: 1632–1640. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.10.1632
[12]  Baur R, Binder S, Benz G (1991) Nonglandular leaf trichomes as short-term inducible defense of the gray alder, Alnus incana (L), against the chrysomelid beetle, Agelastica alni (L). Oecologia 87: 219–226. doi: 10.1007/bf00325259
[13]  Gowda JH (1997) Physical and chemical response of juvenile Acacia tortilis trees to browsing. Experimental evidence. Functional Ecology 11: 106–111. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1997.00065.x
[14]  Young TP, Stanton ML, Christian CE (2003) Effects of natural and simulated herbivory on spine lengths of Acacia drepanolobium in Kenya. Oikos 101: 171–179. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12067.x
[15]  Bazely DR, Myers JH, Dasilva KB (1991) The response of numbers of bramble prickles to herbivory and depressed resource availability. Oikos 61: 327–336. doi: 10.2307/3545240
[16]  Holeski LM (2007) Within and between generation phenotypic plasticity in trichome density of Mimulus guttatus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 2092–2100. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01434.x
[17]  Hanley ME, Lamont BB, Fairbanks MM, Rafferty CM (2007) Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 8: 157–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2007.01.001
[18]  Gómez JM, Zamora R (2002) Thorns as induced mechanical defense in a long-lived shrub (Hormathophylla spinosa, Cruciferae). Ecology 83: 885–890. doi: 10.2307/3071897
[19]  Kitajima K, Llorens AM, Stefanescu C, Timchenko MV, Lucas PW, et al. (2012) How cellulose-based leaf toughness and lamina density contribute to long leaf lifespans of shade-tolerant species. New Phytologist 195: 640–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04203.x
[20]  Traw MB, Dawson TE (2002) Differential induction of trichomes by three herbivores of black mustard. Oecologia 131: 526–532. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0924-6
[21]  Boughton AJ, Hoover K, Felton GW (2005) Methyl jasmonate application induces increased densities of glandular trichomes on tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Journal of Chemical Ecology 31: 2211–2216. doi: 10.1007/s10886-005-6228-7
[22]  Holeski LM, Chase-Alone R, Kelly JK (2010) The Genetics of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plant Defense: Trichome Production in Mimulus guttatus. American Naturalist 175: 391–400. doi: 10.1086/651300
[23]  Barton KE (2014) Prickles, latex and tolerance in the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy (Argemone glauca): Variation between populations, across ontogeny and due to phenotypic plasticity. Oecologia 174: 1273–1281. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2836-z
[24]  Kitajima K, Poorter L (2010) Tissue-level leaf toughness, but not lamina thickness, predicts sapling leaf lifespan and shade tolerance of tropical tree species. New Phytologist 186: 708–721. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03212.x
[25]  Carlquist SJ (1970) Hawai’i: A Natural History: Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawai, Kaua’i, Hawai’i.
[26]  Ziegler AC (2002) Hawaiian Natural History, Ecology, and Evolution. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
[27]  Bowen L, VanVuren D (1997) Insular endemic plants lack defenses against herbivores. Conservation Biology 11: 1249–1254. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96368.x
[28]  Watts SM, Dodson CD, Reichman OJ (2011) The roots of defense: plant resistance and tolerance to belowground herbivory. PLOS ONE 6: 1–8. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018463
[29]  Funk JL, Throop HL (2010) Enemy release and plant invasion: patterns of defensive traits and leaf damage in Hawaii. Oecologia 162: 815–823. doi: 10.1007/s00442-009-1497-4
[30]  Sardans J, Llusia J, Niinemets U, Owen S, Pe?uelas J (2010) Foliar mono- and sesquiterpene contents in relation to leaf economic spectrum in native and alien species in Oahu (Hawai’i). Journal of Chemical Ecology 36: 210–226. doi: 10.1007/s10886-010-9744-z
[31]  Heil M, Ibarra-Laclette E, Adame-Alvarez RM, Martinez O, Ramirez-Chavez E, et al. (2012) How Plants Sense Wounds: Damaged-Self Recognition Is Based on Plant-Derived Elicitors and Induces Octadecanoid Signaling. Plos One 7: 9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030537
[32]  Cipollini D, Heil M (2010) Costs and benefits of induced resistance to herbivores and pathogens in plants. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural resources 5: 1–25. doi: 10.1079/pavsnnr20105005
[33]  Agrawal AA, Heil M (2012) Synthesizing specificity: multiple approaches to understanding the attack and defense of plants. Trends in Plant Science 17: 239–242. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.011
[34]  Schwarzbach AE, Kadereit JW (1999) Phylogeny of prickly poppies, Argemone (Papaveraceae), and the evolution of morphological and alkaloid characters based on ITS nrDNA sequence variation. Plant Systematics and Evolution 218: 257–279. doi: 10.1007/bf01089231
[35]  Neal MC (1965) In Gardens of Hawaii. Honolulu: Bishop Museum Press. 924 p.
[36]  Baldwin RE (1979) Hawaii’s Poisonous Plants. Hilo: Petroglyph Press.
[37]  Goeden RD, Ricker DW (1985) Prickly poppies, Argemone corymbosa and Argemone munita, in Southern California - native weeds attacked by few insects. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 78: 214–216.
[38]  van der Westhuizen L, Mpedi P (2011) The initiation of a biological control programme against Argemone mexicana L. and Argemone ochroleuca Sweet subsp ochroleuca (Papaveraceae) in South Africa. African Entomology 19: 223–229. doi: 10.4001/003.019.0226
[39]  James HF, Burney DA (1997) The diet and ecology of Hawaii’s extinct flightless waterfowl: evidence from coprolites. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 279–297. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01627.x
[40]  Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, Smith JF, Hahn WJ (1994) Thorn-like prickles and heterophylly in Cyanea - adaptations to extinct avian browsers on Hawai’i. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 2810–2814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2810
[41]  Meléndez PA, Capriles VA (2002) Molluscicidal activity of plants from Puerto Rico. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 96: 209–218. doi: 10.1179/000349802125000600
[42]  Shaukat SS, Siddiqui IA, Khan GH, Zaki MJ (2002) Nematicidal and allelopathic potential of Argemone mexicana, a tropical weed - Allelopathic and nematicidal potential of Argemone mexicana. Plant and Soil 245: 239–247.
[43]  Sakthivadivel M, Thilagavathy D (2003) Larvicidal and chemosterilant activity of the acetone fraction of petroleum ether extract from Argemone mexicana L. seed. Bioresource Technology 89: 213–216. doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00038-5
[44]  Osho A, Adetunji T (2010) Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Argemone mexicana Linn. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 4: 19–22.
[45]  Barton KE (2013) Ontogenetic patterns in the mechanisms of tolerance to herbivory in Plantago. Annals of Botany 112: 711–720.
[46]  Pilson D (2000) The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evolutionary Ecology 14: 457–489.
[47]  Agrawal AA, Conner JK, Johnson MTJ, Wallsgrove R (2002) Ecological genetics of an induced plant defense against herbivores: Additive genetic variance and costs of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 56: 2206–2213. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[2206:egoaip]2.0.co;2
[48]  Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, Dejong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, et al. (1995) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity - consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 212–217. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89061-8
[49]  Lilleeng-Rosenberger KE (2005) Growing Hawaii’s Native Plants. Honolulu: Mutual Publishing. 416 p.
[50]  Rasmann S, Johnson MD, Agrawal AA (2009) Induced Responses to Herbivory and Jasmonate in Three Milkweed Species. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35: 1326–1334. doi: 10.1007/s10886-009-9719-0
[51]  Hagel JM, Yeung EC, Facchini PJ (2008) Got milk? The secret life of laticifers. Trends in Plant Science 13: 631–639. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.09.005
[52]  Rasband WS (1997–2011) ImageJ. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institutes of Health. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
[53]  Coley PD (1983) Herbivory and defensive characteristics of tree species in a lowland tropical forest. Ecological Monographs 53: 209–233. doi: 10.2307/1942495
[54]  Agrawal AA, Fishbein M (2006) Plant defense syndromes. Ecology 87: S132–S149. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:pds]2.0.co;2
[55]  Jordan GJ, Dillon RA, Weston PH (2005) Solar radiation as a factor in the evolution of scleromorphic leaf anatomy in Proteaceae. American Journal of Botany 92: 789–796. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.5.789
[56]  Liakopoulos G, Nikolopoulos D, Klouvatou A, Vekkos KA, Manetas Y, et al. (2006) The photoprotective role of epidermal anthocyanins and surface pubescence in young leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Annals of Botany 98: 257–265.
[57]  Benz BW, Martin CE (2006) Foliar trichomes, boundary layers, and gas exchange in 12 species of epiphytic Tillandsia (Brometiaceae). Journal of Plant Physiology 163: 648–656. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.05.008
[58]  Cunningham SA, Summerhayes B, Westoby M (1999) Evolutionary divergences in leaf structure and chemistry, comparing rainfall and soil nutrient gradients. Ecological Monographs 69: 569–588. doi: 10.2307/2657231
[59]  Agrawal AA, Konno K (2009) Latex: A Model for Understanding Mechanisms, Ecology, and Evolution of Plant Defense Against Herbivory. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 40: 311–331. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120307
[60]  Joe SM, Daehler CC (2008) Invasive slugs as under-appreciated obstacles to rare plant restoration: evidence from the Hawaiian Islands. Biological Invasions 10: 245–255. doi: 10.1007/s10530-007-9126-9
[61]  Muola A, Mutikainen P, Laukkanen L, Lilley M, Leimu R (2010) Genetic variation in herbivore resistance and tolerance: the role of plant life-history stage and type of damage. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 2185–2196. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02077.x
[62]  Pe?uelas J, Sardans J, Llusia J, Owen SM, Silva J, et al. (2010) Higher allocation to low cost chemical defenses in invasive species of Hawaii. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36: 1255–1270. doi: 10.1007/s10886-010-9862-7

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133