Artificial Cervical Vertebra and Intervertebral Complex Replacement through the Anterior Approach in Animal Model: A Biomechanical and In Vivo Evaluation of a Successful Goat Model
This was an in vitro and in vivo study to develop a novel artificial cervical vertebra and intervertebral complex (ACVC) joint in a goat model to provide a new method for treating degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine. The objectives of this study were to test the safety, validity, and effectiveness of ACVC by goat model and to provide preclinical data for a clinical trial in humans in future. We designed the ACVC based on the radiological and anatomical data on goat and human cervical spines, established an animal model by implanting the ACVC into goat cervical spines in vitro prior to in vivo implantation through the anterior approach, and evaluated clinical, radiological, biomechanical parameters after implantation. The X-ray radiological data revealed similarities between goat and human intervertebral angles at the levels of C2-3, C3-4, and C4-5, and between goat and human lordosis angles at the levels of C3-4 and C4-5. In the in vivo implantation, the goats successfully endured the entire experimental procedure and recovered well after the surgery. The radiological results showed that there was no dislocation of the ACVC and that the ACVC successfully restored the intervertebral disc height after the surgery. The biomechanical data showed that there was no significant difference in range of motion (ROM) or neural zone (NZ) between the control group and the ACVC group in flexion-extension and lateral bending before or after the fatigue test. The ROM and NZ of the ACVC group were greater than those of the control group for rotation. In conclusion, the goat provides an excellent animal model for the biomechanical study of the cervical spine. The ACVC is able to provide instant stability after surgery and to preserve normal motion in the cervical spine.
References
[1]
Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, et al. (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32: 2310–2317.
[2]
Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, et al. (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27: 2431–2434.
[3]
Cakir B, Carazzo C, Schmidt R, Mattes T, Reichel H, et al. (2009) Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34: 1287–1291.
[4]
Auerbach JD, Wills BP, McIntosh TC, Balderston RA (2007) Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32: 527–536.
[5]
Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81: 519–528.
[6]
Gore DR, Sepic SB (1998) Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23: 2047–2051.
[7]
Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4: 190S–194S.
[8]
Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Raimondi MT, Fornari M, Assietti R (2008) Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis. Med Eng Phys 30: 1127–1133.
[9]
Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, Balderston JR, Rushton SA, et al. (2008) The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J 8: 711–716.
[10]
Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L (1998) Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 7: 148–154.
[11]
Zhu Q, Larson CR, Sjovold SG, Rosler DM, Keynan O, et al. (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32: 55–62.
[12]
Anderson ML, Dhert WJ, de Bruijn JD, Dalmeijer RA, Leenders H, et al. (1999) Critical size defect in the goat's os ilium. A model to evaluate bone grafts and substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 231–239.
[13]
Leung KS, Siu WS, Cheung NM, Lui PY, Chow DH, et al. (2001) Goats as an osteopenic animal model. J Bone Miner Res 16: 2348–2355.
[14]
Zdeblick TA, Wilson D, Cooke ME, Kunz DN, McCabe R, et al. (1992) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. A comparison of techniques in an animal model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 17: S418–426.
[15]
Rocca M, Orienti L, Stea S, Moroni A, Fini M, et al. (1998) Comparison among three different biocoatings for orthopaedic prostheses. An experimental animal study. Int J Artif Organs 21: 553–558.
[16]
Malik AS, Boyko O, Aktar N, Young WF (2001) A comparative study of MR imaging profile of titanium pedicle screws. Acta Radiol 42: 291–293.
[17]
Pait TG, Killefer JA, Arnautovic KI (1996) Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine: the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures. Neurosurgery 39: 769–776.
[18]
Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K (1991) Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16: 861–869.
[19]
Tominaga T, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK, Coons S (1995) Comparative anatomy of the baboon and the human cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20: 131–137.
[20]
Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Schnake K, Lucke M, et al. (2001) Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26: 1028–1037.
[21]
Lu B, He XJ, Zhao CG, Li HP, Wang D (2009) Artificial atlanto-odontoid joint replacement through a transoral approach. Eur Spine J 18: 109–117.
[22]
Zhang J, He X, Li H, Wang D, Zhao W, et al. (2006) Biomechanical study of anterior cervical corpectomy and step-cut grafting with bioabsorbable screws fixation in cadaveric cervical spine model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31: 2195–2201.
[23]
Schimandle JH, Boden SD (1994) Spine update. The use of animal models to study spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19: 1998–2006.
[24]
Liebschner MA (2004) Biomechanical considerations of animal models used in tissue engineering of bone. Biomaterials 25: 1697–1714.
[25]
van der Donk S, Buma P, Aspenberg P, Schreurs BW (2001) Similarity of bone ingrowth in rats and goats: a bone chamber study. Comp Med 51: 336–340.
[26]
Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG (2007) Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 13: 1–10.
[27]
Panjabi MM, Crisco JJ, Vasavada A, Oda T, Cholewicki J, et al. (2001) Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26: 2692–2700.
[28]
Lu B, He X, Zhao CG, Li HP, Wang D (2009) Biomechanical study of artificial atlanto-odontoid joint. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34: 1893–1899.
