全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

A Conserved Mammalian Protein Interaction Network

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052581

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Physical interactions between proteins mediate a variety of biological functions, including signal transduction, physical structuring of the cell and regulation. While extensive catalogs of such interactions are known from model organisms, their evolutionary histories are difficult to study given the lack of interaction data from phylogenetic outgroups. Using phylogenomic approaches, we infer a upper bound on the time of origin for a large set of human protein-protein interactions, showing that most such interactions appear relatively ancient, dating no later than the radiation of placental mammals. By analyzing paired alignments of orthologous and putatively interacting protein-coding genes from eight mammals, we find evidence for weak but significant co-evolution, as measured by relative selective constraint, between pairs of genes with interacting proteins. However, we find no strong evidence for shared instances of directional selection within an interacting pair. Finally, we use a network approach to show that the distribution of selective constraint across the protein interaction network is non-random, with a clear tendency for interacting proteins to share similar selective constraints. Collectively, the results suggest that, on the whole, protein interactions in mammals are under selective constraint, presumably due to their functional roles.

References

[1]  Zhu X, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2007) Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. Genes Dev 21: 1010–1024.
[2]  Teichmann SA, Babu MM (2004) Gene regulatory network growth by duplication. Nat Genet 36: 492–496.
[3]  Wagner A (2001) The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. Mol Biol Evol 18: 1283–1292.
[4]  Li L, Huang Y, Xia X, Sun Z (2006) Preferential duplication in the sparse part of yeast protein interaction network. Mol Biol Evol 23: 2467–2473.
[5]  Guan Y, Dunham MJ, Troyanskaya OG (2007) Functional analysis of gene duplications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 175: 933–943.
[6]  Hakes L, Pinney JW, Lovell SC, Oliver SG, Robertson DL (2007) All duplicates are not equal: the difference between small-scale and genome duplication. Genome Biol 8: R209.
[7]  Kim WK, Marcotte EM (2008) Age-dependent evolution of the yeast protein interaction network suggests a limited role of gene duplication and divergence. PLoS Comput Biol 4: e1000232.
[8]  Kunin V, Pereira-Leal JB, Ouzounis CA (2004) Functional evolution of the yeast protein interaction network. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1171–1176.
[9]  Saeed R, Deane CM (2006) Protein protein interactions, evolutionary rate, abundance and age. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 128.
[10]  Beltrao P, Serrano L (2007) Specificity and evolvability in eukaryotic protein interaction networks. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e25.
[11]  Qian W, He X, Chan E, Xu H, Zhang J (2011) Measuring the evolutionary rate of protein-protein interaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 8725–8730.
[12]  Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW (2002) Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296: 750–752.
[13]  Fraser HB, Wall DP, Hirsh AE (2003) A simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions. BMC Evol Biol 3: 11.
[14]  Bloom JD, Adami C (2003) Apparent dependence of protein evolutionary rate on number of interactions is linked to biases in protein-protein interactions data sets. BMC Evol Biol 3: 21.
[15]  Hahn MW, Conant GC, Wagner A (2004) Molecular evolution in large genetic networks: does connectivity equal constraint? J Mol Evol 58: 203–211.
[16]  Jordan IK, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2003) No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly. BMC Evol Biol 3: 1.
[17]  Mintseris J, Weng Z (2005) Structure, function, and evolution of transient and obligate protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 10930–10935.
[18]  Bloom JD, Drummond DA, Arnold FH, Wilke CO (2006) Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 1751–1761.
[19]  Bustamante CD, Townsend TM, Hartl DL (2000) Solvent accessibility and purifying selection within proteins of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 301–308.
[20]  Lin Y-S, Hsu W-L, Hwang J-K, Li W-H (2007) Proportion of solvent-exposed amino acids in a protein and rate of protein evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1005–1011.
[21]  Choi SS, Vallender EJ, Lahn BT (2006) Systematically assessing the influence of 3-dimensional structural context on the molecular evolution of mammalian proteomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 2131–2133.
[22]  Conant GC (2009) Neutral evolution on mammalian protein surfaces. Trends Genet 25: 377–381.
[23]  Liao BY, Weng MP, Zhang J (2010) Impact of extracellularity on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins. Genome Biol Evol 2: 39–43.
[24]  Julenius K, Pedersen AG (2006) Protein evolution is faster outside the cell. Mol Biol Evol 23: 2039–2048.
[25]  Drummond DA, Raval A, Wilke CO (2006) A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23: 327–337.
[26]  Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH (2005) Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 14338–14343.
[27]  Pal C, Papp B, Hurst LD (2001) Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158: 927–931.
[28]  Pal C, Papp B, Lercher MJ (2006) An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 7: 337–348.
[29]  Vinogradov AE (2010) Systemic factors dominate mammal protein evolution. Proc Biol Sci 277: 1403–1408.
[30]  Drummond DA, Wilke CO (2008) Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134: 341–352.
[31]  Campos PRA, Olivera VM, Wagner GP, Stadler PF (2004) Gene phylogenies and protein-protein interactions: Possible artifacts resulting from shared protein interaction partners. Journal of Theoretical Biology 231: 197–202.
[32]  Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Wall DP, Eisen MB (2004) Coevolution of gene expression among interacting proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9033–9038.
[33]  Hakes L, Lovell SC, Oliver SG, Robertson DL (2007) Specificity in protein interactions and its relationship with sequence diversity and coevolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 7999–8004.
[34]  Korber BT, Farber RM, Wolpert DH, Lapedes AS (1993) Covariation of mutations in the V3 loop of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein: an information theoretic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90: 7176–7180.
[35]  Travers SA, Tully DC, McCormack GP, Fares MA (2007) A study of the coevolutionary patterns operating within the env gene of the HIV-1 group M subtypes. Mol Biol Evol 24: 2787–2801.
[36]  Fares MA, Travers SA (2006) A novel method for detecting intramolecular coevolution: adding a further dimension to selective constraints analyses. Genetics 173: 9–23.
[37]  Goh CS, Bogan AA, Joachimiak M, Walther D, Cohen FE (2000) Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J Mol Biol 299: 283–293.
[38]  Pazos F, Valencia A (2001) Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. Protein Eng 14: 609–614.
[39]  Pérez-Bercoff ?, Makino T, McLysaght A (2010) Duplicability of self-interacting human genes. BMC Evol Biol 10: 160.
[40]  Pellegrini M, Marcotte EM, Thompson MJ, Eisenberg D, Yeates TO (1999) Assigning protein functions by comparative genome analysis: protein phylogenetic profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96: 4285–4288.
[41]  Marcotte EM, Pellegrini M, Thompson MJ, Yeates TO, Eisenberg D (1999) A combined algorithm for genome-wide prediction of protein function. Nature 402: 83–86.
[42]  Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 4569–4574.
[43]  Zhang QC, Petrey D, Deng L, Qiang L, Shi Y, et al. (2012) Structure-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale. Nature 490: 556–560.
[44]  Mathivanan S, Periaswamy B, Gandhi TK, Kandasamy K, Suresh S, et al. (2006) An evaluation of human protein-protein interaction data in the public domain. BMC Bioinformatics 7 Suppl 5S19.
[45]  Fares MA, McNally D (2006) CAPS: coevolution analysis using protein sequences. Bioinformatics 22: 2821–2822.
[46]  Pollock DD, Taylor WR, Goldman N (1999) Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J Mol Biol 287: 187–198.
[47]  Kann MG, Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR, Przytycka TM (2009) Correlated evolution of interacting proteins: looking behind the mirrortree. J Mol Biol 385: 91–98.
[48]  Liang Z, Xu M, Teng M, Niu L, Wu J (2010) Coevolution is a short-distance force at the protein interaction level and correlates with the modular organization of protein networks. FEBS Lett 584: 4237–4240.
[49]  Fernandez A, Lynch M (2011) Non-adaptive origins of interactome complexity. Nature 474: 502–505.
[50]  Conant GC, Wagner A (2002) GenomeHistory: A software tool and its application to fully sequenced genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 3378–3386.
[51]  Yang Z (2007) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1586–1591.
[52]  Flicek P, Aken BL, Beal K, Ballester B, Caccamo M, et al. (2008) Ensembl 2008. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D707–714.
[53]  Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792–1797.
[54]  Hudson CM, Conant GC (2011) Expression level, cellular compartment and metabolic network position all influence the average selective constraint on mammalian enzymes. BMC Evol Biol 11: 89.
[55]  Clark NL, Aquadro CF (2010) A novel method to detect proteins evolving at correlated rates: identifying new functional relationships between coevolving proteins. Mol Biol Evol 27: 1152–1161.
[56]  Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A (2008) Co-evolution and co-adaptation in protein networks. FEBS Lett 582: 1225–1230.
[57]  GO slim. Available: ftp://ftp.geneontology.org/pub/go/GO_sli?ms/archived_GO_slims/goslim_goa.2002 (Accessed Dec. 4, 2012).
[58]  GO identifiers. Available: ftp://ftp.geneontology.org/pub/go/gene-a?ssociations/gene_association.goa_human.g?z (Accessed Dec. 4, 2012).
[59]  Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25: 25–29.
[60]  Conant GC, Wolfe KH (2006) Functional partitioning of yeast co-expression networks after genome duplication. PLoS Biol 4: e109.
[61]  Rambaut A (2006–2099) Tree Figure Drawing Tool. 1.3.1 ed.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133