全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Bystander Responses to a Violent Incident in an Immersive Virtual Environment

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052766

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Under what conditions will a bystander intervene to try to stop a violent attack by one person on another? It is generally believed that the greater the size of the crowd of bystanders, the less the chance that any of them will intervene. A complementary model is that social identity is critical as an explanatory variable. For example, when the bystander shares common social identity with the victim the probability of intervention is enhanced, other things being equal. However, it is generally not possible to study such hypotheses experimentally for practical and ethical reasons. Here we show that an experiment that depicts a violent incident at life-size in immersive virtual reality lends support to the social identity explanation. 40 male supporters of Arsenal Football Club in England were recruited for a two-factor between-groups experiment: the victim was either an Arsenal supporter or not (in-group/out-group), and looked towards the participant for help or not during the confrontation. The response variables were the numbers of verbal and physical interventions by the participant during the violent argument. The number of physical interventions had a significantly greater mean in the in-group condition compared to the out-group. The more that participants perceived that the Victim was looking to them for help the greater the number of interventions in the in-group but not in the out-group. These results are supported by standard statistical analysis of variance, with more detailed findings obtained by a symbolic regression procedure based on genetic programming. Verbal interventions made during their experience, and analysis of post-experiment interview data suggest that in-group members were more prone to confrontational intervention compared to the out-group who were more prone to make statements to try to diffuse the situation.

References

[1]  Darley JM, Latané B (1968) Bystander Intervention in Emergencies - Diffusion of Responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8: 377–383.
[2]  Latané B, Rodin J (1969) A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 5: 189–202.
[3]  Latané B, Nida S (1981) 10 Years of Research on Group-Size and Helping. Psychological Bulletin 89: 308–324.
[4]  Fischer P, Krueger JI, Greitemeyer T, Vogrincic C, Kastenmüller A, et al. (2011) The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander Intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin 137: 517–537.
[5]  Cherry F (1995) The “stubborn particulars” of social psychology: essays on the research process: Routledge.
[6]  Harari H, Harari O, White RV (1985) The reaction to rape by American male bystanders. The Journal of social psychology 125: 633–658.
[7]  Schwartz SH, Gottlieb A (1976) Bystander reactions to a violent theft: Crime in Jerusalem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 1188–1199.
[8]  Schwartz SH, Gottlieb A (1980) Bystander anonymity and reactions to emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 418–430.
[9]  Shotland RL, Straw MK (1976) Bystander response to an assault: When a man attacks a woman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 990–999.
[10]  Borofsky GL, Stollak GE, Messe LA (1971) Sex differences in bystander reactions to physical assault. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7: 313–318.
[11]  Fischer P, Greitemeyer T, Pollozek F, Frey D (2006) The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies? European Journal of Social Psychology 36: 267–278.
[12]  Levine M, Crowther S (2008) The responsive bystander: How social group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95: 1429–1439.
[13]  Rovira A, Swapp D, Spanlang B, Slater M (2009) The use of virtual reality in the study of people's responses to violent incidents. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 3: 59 doi:10.3389/neuro.08.059.2009.
[14]  Sanchez-Vives MV, Slater M (2005) From Presence to Consciousness through Virtual Reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 332–339.
[15]  Slater M (2009) Place Illusion and Plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 364: 3549–3557.
[16]  Blascovich J, Loomis J, Beall A, Swinth K, Hoyt C, et al. (2002) Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry 13: 103–124.
[17]  Hall ET (1973) The hidden dimension. Leonardo: 94–94.
[18]  Wilcox LM, Allison RS, Elfassy S, Grelik C (2006) Personal space in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 3: 412–428.
[19]  Llobera J, Spanlang B, Ruffini G, Slater M (2010) Proxemics with Multiple Dynamic Characters in an Immersive Virtual Environment ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 8: Article 3.
[20]  Bailenson J, Blascovich J, Beall A, Loomis J (2003) Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29: 819–833.
[21]  Frankenhuis WE, Dotsch R, Karremans JC, Wigboldus DHJ (2010) Male physical risk taking in a virtual environment. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 8: 75–86.
[22]  Milgram S (1974) Obedience to Authority: McGraw-Hill.
[23]  Slater M, Antley A, Davison A, Swapp D, Guger C, et al. (2006) A virtual reprise of the Stanley milgram obedience experiments. PLoS ONE 1: e39 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000039.
[24]  Cheetham M, Pedroni AF, Antley A, Slater M, Jáncke L (2009) Virtual milgram: empathic concern or personal distress? Evidence from functional MRI and dispositional measures. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3.
[25]  Gillath O, McCall C, Shaver PR, Blascovich J (2008) What can virtual reality teach us about prosocial tendencies in real and virtual environments? Media Psychology 11: 259–282.
[26]  Levine M, Cassidy C, Brazier G, Reicher S (2002) Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32: 1452–1463.
[27]  Levine M, Thompson K (2004) Identity, place, and bystander intervention: Social categories and helping after natural disasters. Journal of Social Psychology 144: 229–245.
[28]  Levine M, Prosser A, Evans D, Reicher S (2005) Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 443–453.
[29]  Koza JR (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection: The MIT press.
[30]  Schmidt M, Lipson H (2009) Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science 324: 81–85.
[31]  Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach: Springer.
[32]  Hesse-Biber S, Dupuis P, Kinder TS (1991) HyperRESEARCH: A computer program for the analysis of qualitative data with an emphasis on hypothesis testing and multimedia analysis. Qualitative Sociology 14: 289–306.
[33]  Kurzban R, Tooby J, Cosmides L (2001) Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. PNAS 98: 15387–15392.
[34]  Van Bavel JJ, Cunningham WA (2009) Self-categorization with a novel mixed-race group moderates automatic social and racial biases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 35: 321–335.
[35]  Zimbardo P (2007) The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. Random House Inc, New York.
[36]  Reicher SD, Haslam SA, Smith JR (2012) Working Toward the Experimenter Reconceptualizing Obedience Within the Milgram Paradigm as Identification-Based Followership. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 315–324.
[37]  Haslam SA, Reicher SD (2012) Contesting the ‘‘Nature’’ Of Conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo’s Studies Really Show. PLoS Biol 10: e1001426.
[38]  Banyard V (2008) Measurement and Correlates of Prosocial Bystander Behavior: The Case of Interpersonal Violence. Violence and Victims 23: 83–97.
[39]  Cruz-Neira C, Sandin DJ, DeFanti TA, Kenyon RV, Hart JC (1992) The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Communications of the ACM 35: 64–72.
[40]  Tecchia F, Carrozzino M, Bacinelli S, Rossi F, Vercelli D, et al. (2010) A flexible framework for wide-spectrum vr development. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19: 302–312.
[41]  Gillies M, Spanlang B (2010) Comparing and evaluating real-time character engines for virtual environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19: 95–117.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133