Recent studies have shown that the feeling of body ownership can be fooled by simple visuo-tactile manipulations. Perceptual illusions have been reported in which participants sense phantom touch seen on a rubber hand (rubber hand illusion). While previous studies used homologous limbs for those experiments, we here examined an illusion where people feel phantom touch on a left rubber hand when they see it brushed simultaneously with brushes applied to their right hand. Thus, we investigated a referral of touch from the right to the left hand (across the body midline). Since it is known from animal studies that tactile illusions may alter early sensory processing, we expected a modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) corresponding to this illusion. Neuromagnetic source imaging of the functional topographic organization in SI showed a shift in left SI, associated with the strength of the referral of touch. Hence, we argue that SI seems to be closely associated with this perceptual illusion. The results suggest that the transfer of tactile information across the body midline could be mediated by neurons with bilateral tactile receptive fields (most likely BA2).
References
[1]
Tastevin J (1937) En partant de l'experience d'Aristotele. L'encephale 1: 57–84.
[2]
Lackner JR (1988) Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation. Brain 111: 281–297.
[3]
Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hand ‘feels’ touch that eyes can see. Nature 391: 756.
[4]
Armel KC, Ramachandran VS (2003) Projecting sensations to external objects. Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceed Roy Soc Biol Sci 270: 1499–1506.
[5]
Petkova V, Ehrsson HH (2009) When right feels left: referral of touch and ownership between the hands. PloS One 4: e6933.
[6]
Schaefer M, Noennig N, Heinze H-J, Rotte M (2006) Fooling your feelings: Artificially induced referred sensations are linked to a modulation of the primary somatosensory cortex. Neuroimage 29: 67–73.
[7]
Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1998) The percption of phantom limbs. The D.O. Hebb lecture. Brain 121: 1603–1630.
[8]
Flor H, Mühlnickel W, Karl A, Denke C, Grüsser S, et al. (2000) A neural substrate for nonpainful phantom limb phenomena. Neuroreport 11: 1–5.
[9]
Chen LM, Friedman RM, Roe AW (2003) Optical imaging of a tactile illusion in area 3b of the primary somatosensry cortex. Science 302: 881–885.
Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh B, Taub E (1995) Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 270: 305–307.
[12]
Braun C, Heinz U, Schweizer R, Wiech K, Birbaumer N, et al. (2001) Dynamic organization of the somatosensory cortex induced by motor activity. Brain 124: 2259–2267.
[13]
Braun C, Haug M, Wiech K, Birbaumer N, Elbert T, et al. (2002) Functional organization of primay somatosensory cortex depends on the focus of attention. Neuroimage 17: 1451–1458.
[14]
Hari R, Karhu J, H？ml？inen M, Knuutila J, Salonen O, et al. (1993) Functional organization of the human first and second somatosensory cortices. A neuromagnetic study. Europ J Neurosci 5: 724–734.
[15]
Jennings JR, Wood CC (1976) The e-adjustment procedure for repeated-measures analyses of variance. Psychophysiol 13: 277–278.
[16]
Ehrsson HH, Spence C, Passingham RE (2004) That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305: 875–877.
[17]
Rohde M, Di Luca M, Ernst MO (2011) The rubber hand illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand. PloS One 6: e21659.
[18]
Knecht S, Henningsen H, H？hling C, Elbert T, Flor H, et al. (1998) Plasticity of plasticity. Perceptual correlates of reorganization are stable in extent but not in pattern. Brain 121: 717–724.
[19]
Iwamura Y, Iriki A, Tanaka M (1994) Bilateral hand representation in the postcentral somatosensory cortex. Nature 369: 554–556.
[20]
Killackey HP, Gould HJ 3rd, Cusick CG, Pons TP, Kaas JH (1983) The relation of corpus callosum connections to architectonic fields and body surface maps in sensorimotor cortex of new and old world monkeys. J Comp Neurol 219: 384–419.
[21]
Yumija H, Ghez C (1984) Specialized subregions in the cat motor cortex: anatomical demonstration of differential projections to rostral and caudal sectors. Exp Brain Res 53: 259–276.
[22]
Ebisch SJ, Perruci MG, Ferretti A, Del Gratta C, Romani GL, et al. (2008) The sense of touch: Embodied simulation in a visuotactile mirroring mechanism for observed animate or inanimate touch. J Cogn Neuroci 20: 1–13.
[23]
Moore CI, Nelson SB, Sur M (1999) Dynamics of neuronal processing in rat somatosensory cortex. Trends Neurosci 22: 513–520.
[24]
Keysers C, Kaas JH, Gazzola V (2010) Somatosensation in social perception. Nature Rev Neurosci 11: 417–428.
[25]
Braun C, Schweizer R, Elbert T, Birbaumer N, Taub E (2000) Differential activation in somatosensory cortex for different discrimination tasks. J Neurosci 20: 446–450.
[26]
Gallen CC, Schwartz BJ, Rieke K, Pantev C, Sobel D, et al. (1994) Intrasubject reliability and validity of somatosensory source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90: 145–156.
[27]
Schaefer M, Noennig N, Karl A, Heinze H-J, Rotte M (2004) Reproducibility and stability of neuromagnetic source imaging in primary somatosensory cortex. Brain Topogr 17: 47–53.
[28]
Longo MR, Schüür F, Kammers MPM, Tsakiris M, Haggard P (2008) What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107: 978–998.
[29]
Grüsser SM, Mühlnickel W, Schaefer M, Villringer K, Christmann C, et al. (2004) Remote activation of referred phantom sensation and cortical reorganization in human upper extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res 154: 97–102.
[30]
Ehrsson HH, Rosen B, Stockselius A, Ragno C, Kohler P, et al. (2008) Upper limb amputees can be induced to experience a rubber hand as their own. Brain 131: 3443–3452.
