全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Maximising the Size of Non-Redundant Protein Datasets Using Graph Theory

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055484

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Analysis of protein data sets often requires prior removal of redundancy, so that data is not biased by containing similar proteins. This is usually achieved by pairwise comparison of sequences, followed by purging so that no two pairs have similarities above a chosen threshold. From a starting set, such as the PDB or a genome, one should remove as few sequences as possible, to give the largest possible non-redundant set for subsequent analysis. Protein redundancy can be represented as a graph, with proteins as nodes connected by undirected edges, if they have a pairwise similarity above the chosen threshold. The problem is then equivalent to finding the maximum independent set (MIS), where as few nodes are removed as possible to remove all edges. We tested seven MIS algorithms, three of which are new. We applied the methods to the PDB, subsets of the PDB, various genomes and the BHOLSIB benchmark datasets. For PDB subsets of up to 1000 proteins, we could compare to the exact MIS, found by the Cliquer algorithm. The best algorithm was the new method, Leaf. This works by adding clique members that have no edges to nodes outside the clique to the MIS, starting with the smallest cliques. For PDB subsets of up to 1000 members, it usually finds the MIS and is fast enough to apply to data sets of tens of thousands of proteins. Leaf gives sets that are around 10% larger than the commonly used PISCES algorithm, that are of identical quality. We therefore suggest that Leaf should be the method of choice for generating non-redundant protein data sets, though it is ineffective on dense graphs, such as the BHOLSIB benchmarks. The Leaf algorithm is available at: https://github.com/SimonCB765/Leaf, and sets from genomes and the PDB are available at: http://www.bioinf.manchester.ac.uk/leaf/.

References

[1]  Barton GJ (1996) Protein sequence alignment and database scanning. in: MJE Sternberg (ed.) Protein Structure Prediction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996; 31 pp.
[2]  Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403–410.
[3]  Altschul SF, Madden TL, Scha?ffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nuc. Acids Res. 25: 3389–3402.
[4]  Liu P, Zeng Z, Qian Z, Feng K, Cai Y (2009) Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering 1–3.
[5]  Wang GL, Dunbrack RL (2003) PISCES: a protein sequence culling server. Bioinformatics 19: 1589–1591.
[6]  Hobohm U, Sander C (1994) Enlarged representative set of protein structures. Prot. Sci. 3: 522–524.
[7]  Grosso A, Locatelli M, Pullan W (2008) Simple ingredients leading to very efficient heuristics for the maximum clique problem. J. Heuristics 14: 587–612.
[8]  Balaji S, Swaminathan V, Kannan K (2010) A simple algorithm to optimize maximum independent set. Adv. Modeling Optimization 12: 107–118.
[9]  ?sterg?rd PRJ (2002) A fast algorithm for the maximum clique problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics 120: 197–207.
[10]  Niskanen S, ?sterg?rd PRJ (2003) Cliquer User's Guide, Version 1.0; Communications Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology.
[11]  Thain D, Tannenbaum T, Livny M (2005) Distributed computing in practice: the Condor experience. Concurrency - Practice and Experience 17: 323–356.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133