[1] | Weibull J (1996) Evolutionary game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press.
|
[2] | Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314: 1560–1563.
|
[3] | Nowak MA, M MR (1992) Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359: 826–829.
|
[4] | Abramson G, Kuperman M (2001) Social games in a social network. Phys Rev E 63: 030901.
|
[5] | Santos FC, Rodrigues J, Pacheco J (2006) Graph topology plays a determinant role in the evolution of cooperation. Proc R Soc B 273: 51–55.
|
[6] | Hauert C, Szabó G (2004) Game theory and physics. Am J Phys 73: 405–414.
|
[7] | Szabó G, Fath G (2007) Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys Rep 446: 97–216.
|
[8] | Perc M, Szolnoki A (2010) Coevolutionary games - a mini review. BioSystems 99: 109–125.
|
[9] | Cao L, Ohtsuki H, Wang B, Kazuyuki A (2011) Evolution of cooperation on adaptively weighted networks. J Theor Biol 272: 8–15.
|
[10] | Brede M (2011) Playing against the fittest: A simple strategy that promotes the emergence of cooperation. EPL 94: 30003.
|
[11] | Masuda N (2007) Participation costs dismiss the advantage of heterogenous networks in the evolution of cooperation. Proc R Soc B 274: 1815–1821.
|
[12] | Perc M (2006) Coherence resonance in a spatial prisoner's dilemma game. New J Phys 8: 022.
|
[13] | Tanimoto J (2007) Promotion of cooperation by payoff noise in a 2×2 game. Phys Rev E 76: 041130.
|
[14] | Perc M, Szolnoki A (2008) Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game. Phys Rev E 77: 011904.
|
[15] | Szolnoki A, Szabó G (2007) Cooperation enhanced by inhomogeneous activity of teaching for evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game. EPL 77: 30004.
|
[16] | Wang Z, Perc M (2010) Aspiring to the fittest and promotion of cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game. Phys Rev E 82: 002115.
|
[17] | Perc M, Wang Z (2010) Heterogenous aspirations promote cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game. PLoS ONE 5: e15117.
|
[18] | Brede M (2011) The evolution of cooperation on correlated payoff landscapes. Artificial Life 17: 365–373.
|
[19] | Zimmermann M, Eguíluz VM (2005) Cooperation, social networks, and the emergence of leadership in a prisoner's dilemma game with adaptive local interactions. Phys Rev E 72: 056118.
|
[20] | Santos F, Pacheco J, Lenaerts T (2006) Cooperation prevails when individuals adjust their social ties. PLoS Comput Biol 2: 1284–1291.
|
[21] | Van Segbroeck S, Santos FC, Lenaerts T, Pacheco JM (2009) Reacting differently to adverse ties promotes cooperation in social networks. Phys Rev Lett 102: 058105.
|
[22] | Szolnoki A, Vukov J, Szabó G (2009) Selection of noise level in strategy adoption for spatial social dilemmas. Phys Rev E 80: 056112.
|
[23] | Szolnoki A, Perc M (2008) Coevolution of teaching activity promotes cooperation. New J Phys 10: 043036.
|
[24] | Tanimoto M, Brede Jand, Yamauchi A (2012) Network reciprocity by coexisting learning and teaching strategies. Phys Rev E 85: 032101.
|
[25] | Moyano LG, Sánchez A (2009) Evolving learning rules and emergence of cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma. J Theor Biol 259: 85–95.
|
[26] | Chadefaux T, Helbing D (2010) How wealth accumultion can promote cooperation. PLoS ONE 5: e13471.
|
[27] | Szabó G, Toke C (1998) Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on a square lattice. Phys Rev E 58: 69–73.
|
[28] | Tanimoto J (2011) Influence of strategy adaptation speed on network reciprocity for evolutionary prisoner's dilemma games. Sociobiology 58: 315–325.
|
[29] | A BA, Mehta A (2012) Dynamics of competitive learning: The role of updates and memory. Phys Rev E 85: 011134.
|