全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Visual Word Recognition in Deaf Readers: Lexicality Is Modulated by Communication Mode

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059080

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Evidence indicates that adequate phonological abilities are necessary to develop proficient reading skills and that later in life phonology also has a role in the covert visual word recognition of expert readers. Impairments of acoustic perception, such as deafness, can lead to atypical phonological representations of written words and letters, which in turn can affect reading proficiency. Here, we report an experiment in which young adults with different levels of acoustic perception (i.e., hearing and deaf individuals) and different modes of communication (i.e., hearing individuals using spoken language, deaf individuals with a preference for sign language, and deaf individuals using the oral modality with less or no competence in sign language) performed a visual lexical decision task, which consisted of categorizing real words and consonant strings. The lexicality effect was restricted to deaf signers who responded faster to real words than consonant strings, showing over-reliance on whole word lexical processing of stimuli. No effect of stimulus type was found in deaf individuals using the oral modality or in hearing individuals. Thus, mode of communication modulates the lexicality effect. This suggests that learning a sign language during development shapes visuo-motor representations of words, which are tuned to the actions used to express them (phono-articulatory movements vs. hand movements) and to associated perceptions. As these visuo-motor representations are elicited during on-line linguistic processing and can overlap with the perceptual-motor processes required to execute the task, they can potentially produce interference or facilitation effects.

References

[1]  Goswami U (2008) The Development of Reading across Languages. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1145: 1–12 doi:10.1196/annals.1416.018.
[2]  Steinbrink C, Groth K, Lachmann T, Riecker A (2012) Neural correlates of temporal auditory processing in developmental dyslexia during German vowel length discrimination: an fMRI study. Brain Lang 121: 1–11 doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.003.
[3]  Barca L, Cornelissen P, Simpson M, Urooj U, Woods W, et al. (2011) The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: An MEG analysis using virtual electrodes. Brain and Language 118: 53–71.
[4]  Pammer K, Hansen PC, Kringelbach ML, Holliday I, Barnes G, et al. (2004) Visual word recognition: the first half second. Neuroimage 22: 1819–1825 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.004.
[5]  Wheat KL, Cornelissen PL, Frost SJ, Hansen PC (2010) During visual word recognition, phonology is accessed within 100 ms and may be mediated by a speech production code: evidence from magnetoencephalography. J Neurosci 30: 5229–5233 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4448-09.2010.
[6]  Filik R, Barber E (2011) Inner speech during silent reading reflects the reader’s regional accent. PLoS ONE 6: e25782 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025782.
[7]  Grush R (2004) The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 377–396.
[8]  Pickering MJ, Garrod S (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 11: 105–110 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.002.
[9]  Wilson M, Knoblich G (2005) The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol Bull 131: 460–473 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460.
[10]  Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24: 849–878; discussion 878–937.
[11]  Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2001) Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11: R729–732.
[12]  D’Ausilio A, Pulvermüller F, Salmas P, Bufalari I, Begliomini C, et al. (2009) The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Curr Biol 19: 381–385 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.017.
[13]  Leybaert J (2006) L’évaluation des habiletés numériques chez les enfants sourds. Compétences cognitives, linguistiques et sociales de l’enfant sourd. Pistes d’évaluation. Mardaga (Belgique). 223–246.
[14]  Orsolini M, Fanari R, Tosi V, De Nigris B, Carrieri R (2006) From phonological recoding to lexical reading: a longitudinal study on reading development in Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes 21: 576–607.
[15]  Barca L, Ellis AW, Burani C (2007) Context-sensitive rules and word naming in Italian children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 20: 495–509.
[16]  Mazzotta S, Barca L, Marcolini S, Stella G, Burani C (2005) Frequenza, immaginabilità ed età di acquisizione delle parole: in che misura queste variabili influenzano la lettura dei bambini italiani? Psicologia e Clinica dello Sviluppo 2: 247–266.
[17]  Beech JR, Harris M (1997) The prelingually deaf young reader: A case of reliance on direct lexical access? Journal of Research in Reading 20: 105–121.
[18]  Transler C, Reitsma P (2005) Phonological coding in reading of deaf children: Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23: 525–542 doi:10.1348/026151005X26796.
[19]  Miller P (2002) Communication Mode and the Processing of Printed Words: Evidence From Readers With Prelingually Acquired Deafness. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 7: 312–329 doi:10.1093/deafed/7.4.312.
[20]  Miller P (2006) What the processing of real words and pseudohomophones can tell us about the development of orthographic knowledge in prelingually deafened individuals. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 11: 21–38 doi:10.1093/deafed/enj001.
[21]  Waters GF, Doehring DG (n.d.) Reading acquisition in congenitally deaf children who communicate orally: Insights from an analysis of component reading, language, and memory skills. Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. San Diego, CA: Carr TH, Lecy BA. 323–373.
[22]  Beech JR, Harris M (1997) Le jeune lecteur sourd de naissance: un cas de soutien à l’accès direct au lexique? Journal of Research in Reading 20: 105–121 doi:10.1111/1467-9817.00024.
[23]  Ormel E, Hermans D, Knoors H, Hendriks A, Verhoeven L (2010) Phonological activation during visual word recognition in deaf and hearing children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 53: 801–820 doi:10.1044/1092-4388 (2010/08–0033)..
[24]  Connor CM, Craig HK, Raudenbush SW, Heavner K, Zwolan TA (2006) The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation? Ear Hear 27: 628–644 doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000240640.59205.42.
[25]  Caselli MC, Rinaldi P, Varuzza C, Giuliani A, Burdo S (2012) Cochlear implant in the second year of life: lexical and grammatical outcomes. J Speech Lang Hear Res 55: 382–394 doi:10.1044/1092-4388 (2011/10-0248)..
[26]  Nicholas JG, Geers AE (2008) Expected test scores for preschoolers with a cochlear implant who use spoken language. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 17: 121–138 doi:10.1044/1058-0360 (2008/013)..
[27]  Rinaldi P, Caselli C (2009) Lexical and grammatical abilities in deaf Italian preschoolers: The role of duration of formal language experience. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 14: 63–75 doi:10.1093/deafed/enn019.
[28]  Perfetti CA, Sandak R (2000) Reading optimally builds on spoken language: implications for deaf readers. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 5: 32–50 doi:10.1093/deafed/5.1.32.
[29]  Pagliuca G, Arduino LS, Barca L, Burani C (2008) Fully transparent orthography, yet lexical reading aloud: The lexicality effect in Italian. Language and Cognitive Processes 23: 422–433 doi:10.1080/01690960701626036.
[30]  Barca L, Bello A, Volterra V, Burani C (2009) Lexical-semantic reading in a shallow orthography: Evidence from a girl with Williams Syndrome. Reading and Writing An Interdisciplinary Journal DOI: 10.1007/s11145-009-9192-8.
[31]  Cohen L, Lehéricy S, Chochon F, Lemer C, Rivaud S, et al. (2002) Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. Brain 125: 1054–1069.
[32]  Cornelissen PL, Kringelbach ML, Ellis AW, Whitney C, Holliday IE, et al. (2009) Activation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in the first 200 ms of reading: evidence from magnetoencephalography (MEG). PLoS One 4: e5359 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005359.
[33]  Wilson TW, Leuthold AC, Lewis SM, Georgopoulos AP, Pardo PJ (2005) The time and space of lexicality: a neuromagnetic view. Exp Brain Res 162: 1–13 doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2099-3.
[34]  Barca L, Pezzulo G (2012) Unfolding Visual Lexical Decision in Time. PLoS ONE 7: e35932 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035932.
[35]  Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97–113.
[36]  Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH (1998) Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Section 3, The Standard Progressive Matrices. Oxford Psychology Press/San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation. Oxford, England.
[37]  Cornoldi C, Colpo M, Gruppo MT (1998) Prove di Lettura MT. O.S. Firenze.
[38]  Barca L, Burani C, Arduino LS (2002) Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 34: 424–434.
[39]  Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates MD (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412.
[40]  Bates D, Maechler M (2009) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using s4 classes [Computer software manual]. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 (R package version 0.999375–32).
[41]  Burani C, Barca L, Arduino LS (2007) Frequency, not age of acquisition affects Italian word naming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19: 828–836.
[42]  Bottari D, Valsecchi M, Pavani F (2012) Prominent reflexive eye-movement orienting associated with deafness. Cognitive Neuroscience 3: 8–13 doi:10.1080/17588928.2011.578209.
[43]  Morford JP, Wilkinson E, Villwock A, Pi?ar P, Kroll JF (2011) When deaf signers read English: do written words activate their sign translations? Cognition 118: 286–292 doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.006.
[44]  López-Crespo G, Daza MT, Méndez-López M (2012) Visual working memory in deaf children with diverse communication modes: improvement by differential outcomes. Res Dev Disabil 33: 362–368 doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.10.022.
[45]  Bavelier D, Dye MWG, Hauser PC (2006) Do deaf individuals see better? Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed) 10: 512–518 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.006.
[46]  Campbell R, Wright H (1988) Deafness, spelling and rhyme: How spelling supports written word and picture rhyming skills in deaf subjects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A: 771–788.
[47]  Neville HJ, Bavelier D, Corina D, Rauschecker J, Karni A, et al. (1998) Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 922–929.
[48]  Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J (2001) DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev 108: 204–256.
[49]  Castles A, Coltheart M (1996) Cognitive Correlates of Developmental Surface Dyslexia: A Single Case Study. Cognitive Neuropsychology 13: 25–50.
[50]  Corina D, Chiu Y-S, Knapp H, Greenwald R, San Jose-Robertson L, et al. (2007) Neural correlates of human action observation in hearing and deaf subjects. Brain Res 1152: 111–129 doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.03.054.
[51]  Pobric G, Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph MA (2010) Category-specific versus category-general semantic impairment induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Curr Biol 20: 964–968 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.03.070.
[52]  Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, et al. (2005) Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science 308: 662–667 doi:10.1126/science.1106138.
[53]  Pulvermüller F, Huss M, Kherif F, Moscoso del Prado Martin F, Hauk O, et al. (2006) Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 7865–7870 doi:10.1073/pnas.0509989103.
[54]  Willems RM, Hagoort P (2007) Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: a review. Brain Lang 101: 278–289 doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.004.
[55]  Elliott EA, Braun M, Kuhlmann M, Jacobs AM (2012) A dual-route cascaded model of reading by deaf adults: evidence for grapheme to viseme conversion. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 17: 227–243 doi:10.1093/deafed/enr047.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133