Objectives Augmentation index (AIx) is widely used as a measure of wave reflection. We compared the relationship between AIx and age, height and sex with ‘gold standard’ measures of wave reflection derived from measurements of pressure and flow to establish how well AIx measures wave reflection. Materials and Methods Measurements of carotid pressure and flow velocity were made in the carotid artery of 65 healthy normotensive individuals (age 21–78 yr; 43 male) and pulse wave analysis, wave intensity analysis and wave separation was performed; waveforms were classified into type A, B or C. AIx, the time of the first shoulder (Ts), wave reflection index (WRI) and the ratio of backward to forward pressure (Pb/Pf) were calculated. Results AIx did not correlate with log WRI or Pb/Pf. When AIx was restricted to positive values AIx and log WRI were positively correlated (r = 0.33; p = 0.04). In contrast log WRI and Pb/Pf were closely correlated (r = 0.66; p<0.001). There was no correlation between the Ts and the timing of Pb or the reflected wave identified by wave intensity analysis. Wave intensity analysis showed that the morphology of type C waveforms (negative AIx) was principally due to a forward travelling (re-reflected) decompression wave in mid-systole. AIx correlated positively with age, inversely with height and was higher in women. In contrast log WRI and Pb/Pf showed negative associations with age, were unrelated to height and did not differ significantly by gender. Conclusions AIx has serious limitations as a measure of wave reflection. Negative AIx values derived from Type C waves should not be used as estimates of wave reflection magnitude.
References
[1]
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R (2002) Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 360: 1903–1913.
[2]
Nichols, W W. and O’Rourke, M F. (2005) McDonald’s blood flow in arteries: theoretical, experimental and clinical principles. London: Hodder Arnold.
[3]
Mitchell GF, Wang N, Palmisano JN, Larson MG, Hamburg NM et al.. (2010) Hemodynamic correlates of blood pressure across the adult age spectrum: noninvasive evaluation in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 122: 1379–1386. CIRCULATIONAHA.109.914507 [pii];10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.914507 [doi].
[4]
London GM, Blacher J, Pannier B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, et al. (2001) Arterial wave reflections and survival in end-stage renal failure. Hypertension 38: 434–438.
[5]
Manisty C, Mayet J, Tapp RJ, Parker KH, Sever P et al.. (2010) Wave reflection predicts cardiovascular events in hypertensive individuals independent of blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors: an ASCOT (Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcome Trial) substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 56: 24–30. S0735-1097(10)01519-6 [pii];10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.030 [doi].
[6]
Wang KL, Cheng HM, Sung SH, Chuang SY, Li CH, et al. (2010) Wave reflection and arterial stiffness in the prediction of 15-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities: a community-based study. Hypertension 55: 799–805.
[7]
Verbeke F, Marechal C, Van LS, Van BW, Devuyst O et al.. (2011) Aortic stiffness and central wave reflections predict outcome in renal transplant recipients. Hypertension 58: 833–838. HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.176594 [pii];10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.176594 [doi].
[8]
Davies JE, Baksi J, Francis DP, Hadjiloizou N, Whinnett ZI et al.. (2010) The arterial reservoir pressure increases with aging and is the major determinant of the aortic augmentation index. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 298: H580–H586. 00875.2009 [pii];10.1152/ajpheart.00875.2009 [doi].
[9]
Baksi AJ, Treibel TA, Davies JE, Hadjiloizou N, Foale RA et al.. (2009) A meta-analysis of the mechanism of blood pressure change with aging. J Am Coll Cardiol 54: 2087–2092. S0735–1097(09)02975-1 [pii];10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.049 [doi].
[10]
Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O’Rourke M (1989) Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation 80: 1652–1659.
[11]
McEniery CM, Yasmin, Hall IR, Qasem A, Wilkinson IB, et al. (2005) Normal vascular aging: differential effects on wave reflection and aortic pulse wave velocity: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT). J Am Coll Cardiol 46: 1753–1760.
[12]
Segers P, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, Vermeersch SJ, De BD, et al. (2007) Noninvasive (input) impedance, pulse wave velocity, and wave reflection in healthy middle-aged men and women. Hypertension 49: 1248–1255.
[13]
Van Trijp MJ, Bos WJ, Uiterwaal CS, Oren A, Vos LE et al. (2004) Determinants of augmentation index in young men: the ARYA study. Eur J Clin Invest 34: 825–830. ECI1433 [pii];10.1111/j.1365-2362.2004.01433.x [doi].
[14]
Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, et al. (2004) Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension 43: 1239–1245.
[15]
O’Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Thomas M (1996) Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Phillips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175. Blood Press Monit 1: 55–61.
[16]
London GE, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Pannier B, Safar ME, et al. (1996) Cardiac and arterial interactions in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 50: 600–608.
[17]
Zambanini A, Cunningham SL, Parker KH, Khir AW, McG Thom SA, et al. (2005) Wave-energy patterns in carotid, brachial, and radial arteries: a noninvasive approach using wave-intensity analysis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 289: H270–H276.
[18]
Khir AW, O’Brien A, Gibbs JS, Parker KH (2001) Determination of wave speed and wave separation in the arteries. J Biomech 34: 1145–1155.
[19]
Zambanini A, Khir AW, Byrd SM, Parker KH, Thom SAM, et al. (2002) Wave Intensity Analysis: a Novel Non-Invasive Method for Determining Arterial Wave Transmission. Comput Cardiol 29: 717–720.
[20]
Davies JE, Whinnett ZI, Francis DP, Willson K, Foale RA, et al. (2006) Use of simultaneous pressure and velocity measurements to estimate arterial wave speed at a single site in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ 290: H878–H885.
[21]
Takazawa K, Tanaka N, Takeda K, Kurosu F, Ibukiyama C (1995) Underestimation of vasodilator effects of nitroglycerin by upper limb blood pressure. Hypertension 26: 520–523.
[22]
Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA (1980) Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation 62: 105–116.
[23]
Parker KH (2009) An introduction to wave intensity analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 47: 175–188.
[24]
Parker KH, Jones CJ (1990) Forward and backward running waves in the arteries: analysis using the method of characteristics. J Biomech Eng 112: 322–326.
[25]
Hughes AD, Parker KH (2009) Forward and backward waves in the arterial system: impedance or wave intensity analysis? Med Biol Eng Comput 47: 207–210.
[26]
Westerhof N, Sipkema P, Van den Bos GC, Elzinga G (1972) Forward and backward waves in the arterial system. Cardiovasc Res 6: 648–656.
[27]
Manisty CH, Zambanini A, Parker KH, Davies JE, Francis DP, et al. (2009) Differences in the magnitude of wave reflection account for differential effects of amlodipine- versus atenolol-based regimens on central blood pressure: an Anglo-Scandinavian cardiac outcome trial substudy. Hypertension 54: 724–730.
[28]
Segers P, Rietzschel ER, De Buyzere ML, De BD, Van Bortel LM, et al. (2007) Assessment of pressure wave reflection: getting the timing right! Physiol Meas. 28: 1045–1056.
[29]
Trachet B, Reymond P, Kips J, Swillens A, De BM et al.. (2010) Numerical validation of a new method to assess aortic pulse wave velocity from a single recording of a brachial artery waveform with an occluding cuff. Ann Biomed Eng 38: 876–888. 10.1007/s10439-010-9945-1 [doi].
[30]
Keenan NL, Rosendorf KA (2011) Prevalence of hypertension and controlled hypertension - United States, 2005–2008. MMWR Surveill Summ 60 Suppl: 94–97. su6001a21 [pii].
[31]
Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van BL, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, et al. (2006) Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 27: 2588–2605.
