Background Registration can help with transparency of acupuncture clinical trials (ACTs) by making protocol information and results available to the public. Recently, the number of registered ACTs has increased greatly, but only a few researchers have focused on the quality of ACTs registration. This review provides the first assessment of the registration quality of ACTs and the baseline information for future development. Methods All records of ACTs registered in the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were collected. Data was extracted and input to Excel spreadsheets. The current 20 items of the WHO Trial Registration Data Set (TRDS) and the special prepared items for acupuncture intervention details were used to assess the registration quality of ACTs. Results A total of 740 records, found in 11 registries, were examined. The number of registered ACTs increased rapidly and involved a number of different diseases. The completeness of 20 items was not too poor due to 16 of them had a higher reported percentage (>85%). The completeness of the 20 items was different among registries. For example, the average registration percentage of 20 items in Clinicaltrials.gov, ChiCTR, ISRCTN and ANZCTR were 89.6%, 92.2%, 82.4% and 91.6% respectively. Detailed information regarding acupuncture intervention was seriously insufficient. Among the 740 registration records, 89.2% lacked information on the style of acupuncture, 80.8% did not contain details regarding the needles used, 53.5% lacked information on the treatment regimen and 76.2% did not give details of other interventions administered with acupuncture. Conclusions The overall registration quality of ACTs is not high enough due to the serious lack of information on the specifics of acupuncture intervention. It is vital that a number of special items be set regarding acupuncture in order to develop a suitable system for the registration of ACTs.
References
[1]
Richardson PH, Vincent CA (1986) Acupuncture for the treatment of pain: a review of evaluative research. Pain 24: 15–40.
[2]
National Institutes of Health (1998) NIH Consensus Conference. Acupuncture. JAMA 280: 1518–24.
[3]
NIH Consensus Development Program (1997) Acupuncture–Consensus Development Conference Statement. Available: http://consensus.nih.gov/1997/1997Acupun？cture107html.htm. Accessed 2012 Aug 26.
[4]
World Health Organization (2003) Acupuncture: Review and Analysis of Reports on Controlled Clinical Trials. Available: http://www.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js4？926e/#Js4926e. Accessed 2012 Aug 29.
[5]
US National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2006) Acupuncture. Available: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/acupuncture/. Accessed 2012 Nov 7.
[6]
National Health Service (2012) Acupuncture: Evidence for its effectiveness. Available: http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Acupuncture？/Pages/Evidence.aspx. Accessed 2012 Aug 14.
[7]
Sun Yong (2011) Analysis of clinical studies of acupuncture. CJCM 3: 69–70.
[8]
Xu L, Li J, Zhang M, Ai C, Wang L (2008) Chinese authors do need CONSORT: reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals. Contemp Clin Trials 29: 727–731.
[9]
Geng LL, Lin RS, Sun XY, Wu L, Zhong MM, et al. (2008) Critical appraisal of randomized clinical trials in Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion from 2000 to 2006. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu 28: 439–43.
[10]
Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, Rees R (1998) Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Controll Clin Trials 19: 159–166.
[11]
Lao LX (2008) Acupuncture clinical studies and evidence-based medicine–an update. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu 33: 53–61.
[12]
WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). Available: http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Default.？aspx. Accessed 2012 Jul 23.
[13]
Viergever RF, Ghersi D (2011) The quality of registration of clinical trials. PLoS One 6: 1–8.
[14]
Liu X, Li Y, Yu X, Feng J, Zhong X, et al. (2009) Assessment of registration quality of trials sponsored by China. J Evid Based Med 2: 8–18.
[15]
Sekeres M, Gold JL, Chan AW, Lexchin J, Moher D, et al. (2008) Poor reporting of scientific leadership information in clinical trial registers. PloS One 3: e1610.
[16]
WHO Trial Registration Data Set (TRDS). Available: http://www.who.int/ictrp/network/trds/en？/index.html. Accessed 2012 Jul 28.
[17]
Yang DQ, Tu Y (2008) Investigation of registration of international acupuncture clinical trials. Available: http://www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/Detail.a？spx?dbname=CDMDTOTAL&filename=2008113899？.nh&filetitle. Accessed 2012 Jul 29.
[18]
Li ZJ, Liu ML, Wang JN, Liang FR (2012) Method and current situations on acupuncture clinical trial registration in the world. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu 37: 86–7.
[19]
Reveiz L, Krleza-Jeri？ K, Chan AW, de Aguiar S (2007) Do trialists endorse clinical trial registration? Survey of a Pubmed sample. Trials 8: 30.
[20]
Wu B, Liu Y, He J (2002) (Evidence based medicine and the present situation and enlightenment of acupuncture clinical research. Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion 18: 1–2.
[21]
De Angelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, et al. (2005) Is this clinical trial fully registered? A statement from the international committee of medical journal editors. Croat Med J 46: 499–501.
[22]
MacPherson H, Altman DG, Hammerschlag R, Youping L, Taixiang W, et al. (2010) Revised Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. PLoS Med 7(6): e1000261.
[23]
International Committee of Medical Journal (2004) Clinical Trial Registration: A statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Available: http://www.icmje.org/clin_trial.pdf. Accessed 2012 Jun 28.
[24]
Krleza-Jeric K, Chan AW, Dickersin K, Sim I, Grimshaw J, et al. (2005) Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1). BMJ 330(7497): 956–958.
[25]
World Medical Association (2008) Declaration of Helsinki. Available: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10p？olicies/b3/index.html. Accessed 2012 Jun 28.
[26]
Wang L, Jiang J, Li X (2007) Promote the whole level of Chinese medical journals through the mechanism of registry and publicity of clinical experiment. Xian Dai Qing Bao 27: 221–22.
[27]
Ghersi D, Pang T (2009) From Mexico to Mail: four years in the history of clinical trial registration. J Evid Based Med 2(1): 1–7.
[28]
Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, Bloom J, Chan AW, et al. (2008) Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One 3(8): e3081.
[29]
Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E (2007) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(2): MR000005.
[30]
Chalmers I, Glasziou P (2009) Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 374(9683): 86–9.
[31]
Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, et al. (1996) Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 276(8): 637–9.
