全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Automated Objective Routine Examination of Optical Quality of Rigid Endoscopes in a Clinical Setting

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059579

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Rigid endoscopes degrade during clinical use due to sterilization, ionizing radiation and mechanical forces. Despite visual checks on functionality at the department of sterilization, surgeons are still confronted with suboptimal instruments as it is difficult to assess this degradation in an objective manner. To guarantee that endoscopes have sufficient optical quality for minimal invasive surgery, an experimental opto-electronic test bench has been developed in order to be used at the department of sterilization. Transmission of illumination fibres and lens contrast values are stored in a database to enable empirical criteria to reject endoscope for further clinical usage or to accept endoscopes after repair. Results of the test bench are given for an eight month period, where a trained operator performed 1599 measurements on 46 different types. Stability of the system, trends in quality of clinical endoscopes, and effect of repair or replacement were assessed. Although the period was too short to draw firm conclusions, a slow downwards trend in quality of clinically used endoscopes could be observed. Also, endoscopes generally improve in quality after repair or replacement, while endoscope replacement seems to slightly outperform endoscope repair. To optimize the measurement process, a new system is being developed requiring less user interaction and measuring more optical parameters of an endoscope. By commercializing this system, we hope that measurements at different hospitals will give improved insight which acceptance and rejection criteria to use and which factors (usage, cleaning protocol, and brands) determine the economic lifetime of endoscopes.

References

[1]  Darzi A, Munz Y (2004) The impact of minimal invasive surgical techniques. Annual review of medicine 55: 223–237 DOI:10.1146/annurev.med.55.091902.105248.
[2]  Boer I de, Noordmans HJ, Brink H van den, Gips R, Janssen MJH, et al.. (2008) Kwaliteitsborging van Instrumenten en Apparatuur gebruikt bij Minimaal Invasieve Chirurgie, rapport van de projectgroep MICADO. WIBAZ/NVKF Available: http://www.wibaz.nl/media/download_galle?ry/W2008-579.pdf accessed 14 November 2012.
[3]  Ayliffe GAJ, Babb JR, Bradley CR (1992) ‘Sterilization’ of arthroscopes and laparoscopes. Journal of Hospital Infection 22: 265–269.
[4]  Spry C, Leiner DC (2004) Rigid endoscopes – ensuring quality before use and after repair. AORN Journal vol 80 no 1: 103–109.
[5]  Health Care Inspectorate (2009) Toetsingskader Follow-up Minimaal invasieve chirurgie ten behoeve van het tweede-faseonderzoek vanaf september 2009. (Dutch) Available: www.medischetechnologie.nl/download.php??refid=740&ei=j9-sUKHpNsTS0QWju4HwBg&usg=?AFQjCNGIOfy-cRfbHaV2jHSFrHnSlXJq5w. Accessed 2012 Nov 21.
[6]  Noordmans HJ, Mil I, Daoudi S, Kruit S, Brink H van den, Verdaasdonk R (2006) Optical quality assessment of rigid endoscopes during clinical lifetime. San Francisco: SPIE Photonics West. SPIE - Design and Quality for Biomedical Technologies.
[7]  Noordmans HJ, Kruit S, Stroosnijder P, Brink H van den, Verdaasdonk R (2008) Quantitative assessment of degradation of the optical quality of rigid endoscopes in clinical practice. San Francisco: SPIE Photonics West. SPIE - Design and Quality for Biomedical Technologies.
[8]  Karl Storz - Endoscope. Manual Telescopes and [HOPKINS]? Telescopes. Version 2.5_04/2002.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133