全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Water Ecosystem Services in Northern Australia—How Much Are They Worth and Who Should Pay for Their Provision?

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064411

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

There is ongoing pressure to develop the largely unaltered Daly River catchment in northern Australia for agriculture. However, a choice experiment among people in the region and in Australia’s largest city, Sydney, shows that people are prepared to pay substantial amounts to maintain the quality of its ecosystem services. The total stated willingness-to-pay (WTP) for a Daly River conservation programme was about $300, of which people would be willing to pay over half ($161) if the programme retained waterholes for Aboriginal people in good condition. The WTP for high quality recreational fishing and biodiversity values was $120 and $91 respectively. Using the average cost of a recreational fishing license in Australia ($35) as a basis for grounding the stated preferences in empirical values, as well as the cost of park entry fees and the amount of support society provides to agriculture in Australia, the total amount that the 110,000 people in the region are likely to be willing to pay for the retention of the values in the Daly River catchment is about $6 million, while the 4.5 million people in Sydney would be willing to pay about $81 million. A significant finding in this research is that, while fishing, biodiversity and agricultural values all have equivalents in the market economy, the value for which people were willing to pay most, the cultural value, has no equivalent at all and is thus receives almost no investment.

References

[1]  Ferraro PJ, Simpson RD (2002) The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Econ 78: 339–53.
[2]  Grieg-Gran M, Porras IT, Wunder S (2005) How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Dev 33: 1511–1527.
[3]  Wunder S (2007) The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv Biol 21: 48–58.
[4]  Balmford A, Whitten T (2003) Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? Oryx 37: 238–250.
[5]  Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63: 616–626.
[6]  Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, et al. (2009) Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7: 21–28.
[7]  Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P (2009) Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 68: 643–653.
[8]  Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecol Econ 65: 663–674.
[9]  Farley J, Costanza R (2010) Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecol Econ 69: 2060–2068.
[10]  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island Press: Washington.
[11]  The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) (2010) Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
[12]  Hamilton SK, Gehrke PC (2005) Australia’s tropical river systems: current scientific understanding and critical knowledge gaps for sustainable management. Mar Freshwater Res 56: 243–252.
[13]  Blanch S (2008) Steps to a sustainable Northern Australia. Manag Restor 9: 110–115.
[14]  Dutton A, Edwards-Jones G, MacDonald DW (2010) Estimating the value of non-use benefits from small changes in the provision of ecosystem services. Conserv Biol 24: 1479–1487.
[15]  Hanley N, Mourato S, Wright R (2001) Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?. J Econ Surv 15: 435–462.
[16]  Barkmann J, Glenk K, Keil A, Leemhuis C, Dietrich N, et al. (2008) Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: the case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods. Ecol Econ 65: 48–62.
[17]  Meyerhoff J, Liebe U, Hartje V (2009) Benefits of biodiversity enhancement of nature-oriented silviculture: Evidence from two choice experiments in Germany. J Forest Econ 15: 37–58.
[18]  Tarfasa S, Brouwer R (2013) Estimation of the public benefits of urban water supply improvements in Ethiopia: A choice experiment. Appl Econ 45: 1099–1108.
[19]  Rolfe J, Windle J (2005) Valuing options for reserve water in the Fitzroy Basin. Aust J Agr Resour Ec 49: 91–114.
[20]  Zander KK, Garnett ST, Straton A (2010) Trade-offs between development, culture and conservation – willingness to pay for tropical river management among urban Australians. J Environ Manage 91: 2519–2528.
[21]  Kragt ME, Bennett J (2011) Using choice experiments to value catchment and estuary health in Tasmania with individual preference heterogeneity. Aust J Agr Resour Ec 55: 159–179.
[22]  Hatton MacDonald D, Morrison MD, Rose JM, Boyle KJ (2011) Valuing a multistate river: the case of the River Murray. Aust J Agr Resour Ec 55: 374–392.
[23]  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002) Handbook of biodiversity evaluation -a guide for policy makers. OECD Publications: Paris.
[24]  Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, et al. (2009) Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 1305–1312.
[25]  Zheng W, Shi H, Chen S, Zhu M (2009) Benefit and cost analysis of mariculture based on ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 68: 1626–1632.
[26]  Jackson S, Storrs M, Morrison J (2005) Recognition of Aboriginal rights, interests and values in river research and management: perspectives from northern Australia. Ecol Manag Restor 6: 107–110.
[27]  Zander KK, Straton A (2010) An economic assessment of the value of tropical river ecosystem services: heterogeneous preferences among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians. Ecol Econ 69: 2417–2426.
[28]  Whitehead PJ, Wilson BA, Bowman D (1990) Conservation of coastal wetlands of the Northern Territory of Australia: the Mary River floodplain. Biol Conserv 52: 85–111.
[29]  Bayliss P, Bartolo R, van Dam R (2008) Quantitative ecological risk assessments for the Daly River, in: Bartolo R, Bayliss P, van Dam R (Eds.), Ecological risk assessment for Australia’s northern tropical rivers. Sub-project 2 of Australia’s Tropical Rivers – an integrated data assessment and analysis (DET18), A report to Land & Water Australia. Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research, Darwin, 271–415. http://www.environment.gov.au/ssd/tropic?al-rivers/triap-sp2.html.
[30]  Daly River Management Advisory Committee (2009) Daly River Catchment: regional perspective. in: Northern Australia Land and Water Science Review 2009 Chapter Summaries, Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government, Canberra, 60–61.
[31]  Bliemer M, Rose JM, Hensher DA (2009) Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models. Transport Res B-Meth 43: 19–35.
[32]  Sándor Z, Wedel M (2001) Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers’ prior beliefs. J Marketing Res 38: 430–444.
[33]  Birol E, Karousakis K, Koundouri P (2006) Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: the case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece. Ecol Econ 60: 145–156.
[34]  Rolfe J, Prayaga P (2007) Estimating values for recreational fishing at freshwater dams in Queensland. Aust J Agr Resour Ec 51: 157–174.
[35]  McFadden D, Train K (2000) Mixed MNL models of discrete response. J Appl Econ 15: 447–470.
[36]  Beharry-Borg N, Scarpa R (2010) Valuing quality changes in Caribbean coastal waters for heterogeneous beach visitors. Ecol Econ 69: 1124–1139.
[37]  Hensher DA, Rose J, Greene WH (2005) The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes. Transportation 32: 203–222.
[38]  Scarpa R, Gilbride TJ, Campbell D, Hensher DA (2009) Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments: does it matter?. Eur Rev Agric Econ 36: 151–174.
[39]  Campbell D, Hutchinson WG, Scarpa R (2008) Incorporating discontinuous preferences into the analysis of discrete choice experiments. Environ Resour Econ 41: 101–117.
[40]  Krinsky I, Robb AL (1986) On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev Econ Stat 68: 715–719.
[41]  Bateman I, Day BH, Georgiou S, Lake I (2006) The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecol Econ 60: 450–460.
[42]  Morrison M (2000) Aggregation biases in stated preference studies. Australian Econ Pap39: 215–230.
[43]  Hanley N, Schl?pfer F, Spurgeon J (2003) Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values. J Environ Manage 68: 297–304.
[44]  Hoyos D (2010) The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecol Econ 69: 1595–1603.
[45]  Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
[46]  Greene WH, Hensher DA, Rose J (2006) Accounting for heterogeneity in the variance of unobserved effects in mixed logit models. Transport Res B-Meth 40: 75–92.
[47]  Rolfe JC, Blamey RK, Bennett JW (1997) Remnant vegetation and broadscale tree clearing in the Desert Uplands Region of Queensland. Choice Modelling Research Report No.3. The University of New South Wales: Canberra.
[48]  Blamey R, Gordon J, Chapman R (1999) Choice modelling: assessing the environmental values of water supply options. Aust J Agr Resour Ec 43: 337–57.
[49]  Blamey R, Rolfe J, Bennett J, Morrison M (2000) Valuing remnant vegetation in Central Queensland using choice modelling. Aust J Agr Resour Ec 44: 439–56.
[50]  Department of Finance and Deregulation (2010) Best Practice Regulation Handbook, June 2010 edition. Australian Government, Office of Best Practice Regulation, http://www.finance.gov.au/obpr/proposal/?gov-requirements.html [Accessed 13 July 2012].
[51]  Carson R, Flores N, Martin K, Wright J (1996) Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Econ 72: 80–99.
[52]  Carlsson F, Martinsson P (2001) Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? J Environ Econ Manag 41: 179–192.
[53]  Department of Primary Industry, Fisheries and Mines (2006) Future monitoring and research options for recreational fishing in the Northern Territory.
[54]  Tourism NT (2009) Fishing Tourism. http://www.tourismnt.com.au/Portals/3/do?cs/research/fishing_tourism_YE_Jun09.pdf [Accessed 13 July 2012].
[55]  Attorney-General for Australia (2010) Joint Press Conference with Northern Territory Chief Minister Paul Henderson and Robert McClelland MP, July 15, 2010, Darwin.
[56]  Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (2012) Kakadu National Park passes. http://www.environment.gov.au/parks/kaka?du/visitor-information/park-pass.html [Accessed 13 July 2012].
[57]  Northern Territory Government (2011) INPEX Community Agreement Signed. http://www.newsroom.nt.gov.au/index.cfm??fuseaction=printRelease&ID=8344 [Accessed 13 July 2012].
[58]  Russell-Smith J, Whitehead P, Cooke P (2009) Culture, ecology and economy of fire management in North Australian savannas: rekindling the Wurrk tradition. CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.
[59]  Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2011) Agriculture statistics: producer and consumer support estimates. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/statistics [Accessed 13 July 2012].
[60]  Australian Taxation Office (2002) Diesel fuel rebate scheme. www.ato.gov.au/docs/2002FRGS03.rtf [Accessed 13 July 2012].
[61]  Stoeckel N, Jackson S, Pantus F, Finn M, Kennard MJ, et al. (2013) An integrated assessment of financial, hydrological, ecological and social inputs of ‘development’ on Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in northern Australia. Biol Conserv 159: 214–221.
[62]  Mueller S (2008) Indigenous Payment for Environmental Service (PES) opportunities in the Northern Territory: negotiating with customs. Aust Geogr 39: 149–170.
[63]  May K (2010) Indigenous cultural and natural resource management and the emerging role of the Working on Country program. CAEPR working paper No. 65. The Australian National University: Canberra.
[64]  Garnett ST, Sithole B, Whitehead PJ, Burgess CP, Johnston FH, et al. (2009) Healthy country, healthy people: policy implications of links between Indigenous human health and environmental condition in tropical Australia. Aust J Publ Admin 68: 53–66.
[65]  Campbell D, Burgess CP, Garnett ST, Wakeman J (2011) Potential primary health care savings for chronic disease care associated with Australian Aboriginal involvement in land management. Health Policy 99: 83–89.
[66]  Rea N, Messner J (2008) Constructing Aboriginal NRM livelihoods: Anmatyerr employment in water management. Rangeland J 30: 85–93.
[67]  Bayliss P, Liedloff A, McKaige B, Andersen AN (2010) Indigenous wetland burning: conserving natural and cultural resources in Australia’s World Heritage-listed Kakadu National Park. Hum Ecol 38: 721–729.
[68]  Zander KK, Dunnett DR, Brown C, Campion O, Garnett ST (2013) Rewards for providing environmental services - where indigenous Australians’ and western perspectives collide. Ecol Econ 87: 145–154.
[69]  Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) Australian Demographic Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au [Accessed 13 July 2012].
[70]  Northern Territory Treasury (2010) Labour Force November 2010. www.nt.gov.au/ntt/economics/publications?/economic_briefs/labour_force_nov10.pdf [Accessed 13 July 2012].

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133