全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Duck Productivity in Restored Species-Rich Native and Species-Poor Non-Native Plantings

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068603

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Conservation efforts to increase duck production have led the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to restore grasslands with multi-species (3-5) mixtures of introduced cool season vegetation often termed dense nesting cover (DNC). The effectiveness of DNC to increase duck production has been variable, and maintenance of the cover type is expensive. In an effort to decrease the financial and ecological costs (increased carbon emissions from plowing and reseeding) of maintaining DNC and provide a long-term, resilient cover that will support a diversity of grassland fauna, restoration of multi-species (16-32) plantings of native plants has been explored. We investigated the vegetation characteristics, nesting density and nest survival between the 2 aforementioned cover types in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, USA from 2010–2011 to see if restored-native plantings provide similar benefits to nesting hens as DNC. We searched 14 fields (7 DNC, 271 ha; and 7 restored native, 230 ha) locating 3384 nests (1215 in restored-native vegetation and 2169 in DNC) in 2010-2011. Nest survival was similar between cover types in 2010, while DNC had greater survival than native plantings in 2011. Densities of nests adjusted for detection probability were not different between cover types in either year. We found no structural difference in vegetation between cover types in 2010; however, a difference was detected during the late sampling period in 2011 with DNC having deeper litter and taller vegetation. Our results indicate restored-native plantings are able to support similar nesting density as DNC; however, nest survival is more stable between years in DNC. It appears the annual variation in security between cover types goes undetected by hens as hens selected cover types at similar levels both years.

References

[1]  Nolan V (1978) The ecology and behavior of the prairie warbler (Dendroica discolor). Ornithol Monogr 26.
[2]  Sherry TW, Holmes RT (1992) Population fluctuations in a long-distance neotropical migrant: demographics evidence for the importance of breeding season events in the American Redstart. In: JM WaganDW Johnson. Ecology and conservation of neotropical migrant land-birds. Washington D.C.: Smithsonian Institute Press. pp. 431-442.
[3]  McMaster DG, Devries JH, Davis SK (2005) Grassland birds nesting in haylands of southern Saskatchewan: landscape influences and conservation priorities. J Wildl Manage 69: 211-221. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069.
[4]  Fletcher RJ Jr, Koford RR, Seaman DA (2006) Critical demographic parameters for declining songbirds breeding in restored grasslands. J Wildl Manage 70: 145-157. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[145:CDPFDS]2.0?.CO;2.
[5]  Winter M, Johnson DH, Shaffer JA, Donovan TM, Svedarsky WD (2006) Patch size and landscape effects on density and nesting success of grassland birds. J Wildl Manage 70: 158-172. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[158:PSALEO]2.0?.CO;2.
[6]  With KA, King AW, Jensen WE (2008) Remaining large grasslands may not be sufficient to prevent grassland bird declines. Biol Conserv 141: 3152-3167. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.025.
[7]  Bakker KK, Higgins KF (2009) Planted grasslands and native sod prairie: equivalent habitat for grassland birds? Western North American Nat 69: 235-242. doi:10.3398/064.069.0212.
[8]  Stephens SE, Koons DN, Rotella JJ, Wiley DW (2004) Effects of habitat fragmentation on avian nesting success: a review of the evidence at multiple spatial scales. Biol Conserv 115: 101-110. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00098-3.
[9]  Sovada MA, Sargeant AB, Grier JW (1995) Differential effects of coyotes and red foxes on duck nest success. J Wildl Manage 59: 1-9. doi:10.2307/3809108.
[10]  Krapu GL, Klett AT, Jorde DG (1983) The effect of variable springwater conditions on mallard reproduction. Auk 100: 689-698.
[11]  Higgins KF, Naugle DE, Forman KJ (2002) A case study of changing land use practices in the northern Great Plains, USA: an uncertain future for water bird conservation. Waterbirds 25 Special Publication 2):42-50.
[12]  Stephens SE, Walker JA, Blunck DR, Jayaraman A, Naugle DE et al. (2008) Predicting risk of habitat conversion in native temperate grasslands. Conserv Biol 22: 1320-1330. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01022.x. PubMed: 18717691.
[13]  Kaiser PH, Berlinger SS, Fredrickson LH (1979) Response of blue-winged teal to range management on waterfowl production areas in southeastern South Dakota. J Range Manag 32: 295-298. doi:10.2307/3897835.
[14]  Rodriguez EF (1984) Dense nesting cover versus native grassland in relation to duck nesting success and density. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
[15]  Higgins KF, Barker WT (1982) Changes in vegetation structure in seeded nesting cover in the prairie pothole region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report 242. D.C.: Washington.
[16]  Reynolds RE, Shaffer TL, Renner RW, Newton WE, Batt BDJ (2001) Impact of the conservation reserve program on duck recruitment in the US Prairie Pothole Region. J Wildl Manage 65: 765-780. doi:10.2307/3803027.
[17]  Arnold TW, Craig-Monroe LM, Armstrong LM, Howerter DW, Devries JH et al. (2007) Waterfowl use of dense nesting cover in the Canadian Parklands. J Wildl Manage 71: 2542-2549. doi:10.2193/2005-568.
[18]  Duebbert HF (1969) High nest density and hatching success of ducks on South Dakota CAP land. Transactions of . The North American Wildlife Conference 34:218-229.
[19]  Higgins KF (1977) Duck nesting in intensively farmed areas of North Dakota. J Wildl Manage 41: 232-242. doi:10.2307/3800600.
[20]  Klett AT, Shaffer TL, Johnson DH (1988) Duck nest success in the prairie pothole region. J Wildl Manage 52: 431-440. doi:10.2307/3801586.
[21]  Ball IJ, Eng RL, Ball SK (1995) Population density and productivity of ducks on large grassland tracts in northcentral Montana. Wildl Soc Bull 23: 767-773.
[22]  Gilbert DW, Anderson DR, Ringelman JK, Szymczak MR (1996) Response of nesting ducks to habitat and management on the Monte Vista National Wildlife Refuge, Colorado. Wildl Monogr 131: 3-44.
[23]  McKinnon DT, Duncan DC (1999) Effectiveness of dense nesting cover for increasing duck production in Saskatchewan. J Wildl Manage 63: 382-389. doi:10.2307/3802523.
[24]  Sample DW (1989) Grassland birds in southern Wisconsin: habitat preference, population trends, and response to land use changes. Thesis Madison: University of Wisconsin Madison.
[25]  Menke JW (1992) Grazing and fire management for native perennial grass restoration in California grassland. Fremontia 20: 22-25.
[26]  Delisle JM, Savidge JA (1997) Avian use and vegetation characteristics of Conservation Reserve Program fields. J Wildl Manage 61: 318-325. doi:10.2307/3802587.
[27]  Pasitschniak-Arts M, Messier F (1998) Effects of edges and habitats on small mammals in a prairie ecosystem. Can J Zool 76: 2020-2025. doi:10.1139/z98-144.
[28]  Larivière S, Messier F (2000) Habitat selection and use of edges by striped skunks in the Canadian prairies. Can J Zool 78: 366-372. doi:10.1139/z99-230.
[29]  McCoy TD, Kurzejeski EW, Burger LW, Ryan MR (2001) Effects of conservation practice, mowing, and temporal changes on vegetation structure on CRP fields in northern Missouri. Wildl Soc Bull 29: 979-987.
[30]  Jonas JL, Whiles MR, Charlton RE (2002) Aboveground invertebrate responses to land management differences in a central Kansas grassland. Environment Entomol 31: 1142-1152. doi:10.1603/0046-225X-31.6.1142.
[31]  Hickman KR, Farley GH, Channell RC, Steier JE (2006) Effects of old world bluestem (Bothriuchloa ischaemum) on food availability and avian community composition within the mixed-grass prairie. Southwest Nat 51: 524-530. doi:10.1894/0038-4909(2006)51[524:EOOWBB]2.0?.CO;2.
[32]  Koper N, Schmiegelow FKA (2007) Does management for duck productivity affect songbird nesting success? J Wildl Manage 71: 2249-2257. doi:10.2193/2006-354.
[33]  Klug P, Wolfenbarger LLR, McCarty JPM (2009) The nest predator community of grassland birds responds to agroecosystem habitat at multiple scales. Ecography 32: 973-982. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05857.x.
[34]  Urbanska KM, Webb NR, Edwards PJ (1997) Why restoration? In: KM UrbanskaNR WebbPJ Edwards. Restoration ecology and sustainable development. Cambridge: University Press. pp. 3-7.
[35]  Society for Ecological Restoration (SER) (2004) The SER international primer on ecological restoration. Available: http://www.ser.org. Accessed: 20 March 2011.
[36]  Blumenthal DM, Jordan NR, Svenson EL (2003) Weed control as a rationale for restoration: the example of tallgrass prairie. Conserv Ecol 7: 6-17.
[37]  Blumenthal DM, Jordan NR, Svenson EL (2005) Effects of prairie restoration on weed invasions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107: 221-230. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.11.008.
[38]  Guo Q, Shaffer T, Buhl T (2006) Community maturity, species saturation and the variant diversity-productivity relationships in grasslands. Ecol Lett 9: 1284-1292. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00980.x. PubMed: 17118002.
[39]  Millenbah KF, Winterstein SR, Campa H III, Furrow LT, Minnis RB (1996) Effects of Conservation Reserve Program field age on avian relative abundance, diversity, and productivity. Wilson Bull 108: 760-770.
[40]  Trowbridge WB (2007) The role of stochasticity and priority effects in floodplain restoration. Ecol Appl 17: 1312-1324. doi:10.1890/06-1242.1. PubMed: 17708210.
[41]  Glover FA (1956) Nesting and production of blue-winged teal (Anas discors) in northwest Iowa. J Wildl Manage 20: 28-46. doi:10.2307/3797244.
[42]  Keith LB (1961) A study of waterfowl ecology on small impoundments in southeastern Alberta. Wildl Monogr 6: 1-88.
[43]  Clark JP (1977) Effects of experimental management schemes on production and nesting ecology of ducks at Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
[44]  Duebbert HF, Lokemoen JT, Sharp DE (1986) Nest sites of ducks in grazed mixed-grass prairie in North Dakota. Prairie Nat 18: 99-108.
[45]  West BC, Messmer TA (2006) Effects of livestock grazing on duck nesting habitat in Utah. Rangeland Ecol Manag 59: 208-211. doi:10.2111/05-118R1.1.
[46]  Robel RJ, Briggs JN, Dayton AD, Hulbert LC (1970) Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. J Range Manag 23: 295-297. doi:10.2307/3896225.
[47]  Fisher RJ, Davis SK (2010) From Wiens to Robel: a review of grassland-bird habitat selection. J Wildl Manage 74: 265-273. doi:10.2193/2009-020.
[48]  Schneider NA (1998) Passerine use of grasslands managed with two grazing regimes on the Missouri Coteau in North Dakota. Thesis, South Dakota State University, Brookings.
[49]  Bue IG, Blankenship L, Marshall WH (1952) The relationship of grazing practices to waterfowl breeding populations and production on stock ponds in western South Dakota. Transactions of . The North American Wildlife Conference 17:396-414.
[50]  Gjersing FM (1975) Waterfowl production in relation to rest-rotation grazing. J Range Manag 28: 37-42. doi:10.2307/3897576.
[51]  Winter M (1999) Relationship of fire history to territory size, breeding density, and habitat of Baird’s sparrow in North Dakota. Stud Avian Biol 19: 171-177.
[52]  Daubenmire R (1959) A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Sci 33: 43-64.
[53]  Klett AT, Duebbert HF, Faanes CA, Higgins KF (1986) Techniques for studying nest success of ducks in upland habitats in the Prairie Pothole Region. Resource Publication 158, Washington, D.C.
[54]  Gloutney ML, Clark RG, Afton AD, Huff GJ (1993) Timing of nest searches for upland nesting waterfowl. J Wildl Manage57: 597-601.
[55]  Weller MG (1956) A simple field candler for waterfowl eggs. J Wildl Manage 20: 111-113. doi:10.2307/3797414.
[56]  Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21: 213-251. doi:10.2307/1218190.
[57]  White GC, Burnham KP (1999)?Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 Supplement: 120-138. doi:10.1080/00063659909477239.
[58]  Dinsmore SJ, White GW, Knopf FL (2002) Advanced techniques for modeling avian nest survival. Ecology 83: 3476-3488. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[3476:ATFMAN]2?.0.CO;2.
[59]  McPherson RJ, Arnold TW, Armstrong LM, Schwarz CJ (2003) Estimating the nest-success rate and the number of nests initiated by radiomarked mallards. J Wildl Manage 67: 843-851. doi:10.2307/3802691.
[60]  Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: BN PetrovF. Csaki. Second international symposium on information theory. Budapest: Akademiai. pp. 267-281.
[61]  Stewart RE, Kantrud HA (1971) Classification of natural ponds and lakes in the glaciated prairie region. Resource Publication 92, Washington, D.C.
[62]  King JW, Savidge JA (1995) Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program on wildlife in southeast Nebraska. Wildl Soc Bull 23:377-385.
[63]  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2011) National Climate Data Center. Available: www.ncdc.noaa.gov. Accessed: 10 December 2011.
[64]  Black CC (1971) Ecological implications of dividing plants into groups with distinct photosynthetic production capacities. In: JB Cragg. Advances in ecological research. New York: Academic Press. pp. 87-114.
[65]  Shirley S (1994) Restoring the tallgrass prairie: an illustrated manual for Iowa and the Upper Midwest. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. 330pp.
[66]  Packard S, Mutel CR (2005) The tallgrass restoration handbook: for prairies, savannas, and woodlands. Washington, D.C.: Island Press. 463pp.
[67]  Smith DD, Williams D, Houseal G, Henderson K (2010) The tallgrass prairie center guide to prairie restoration in the Upper Midwest. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. 301pp.
[68]  Klett AT, Duebbert HF, Heismeyer GL (1984) Use of seeded native grasses as nesting cover by ducks. Wildl Soc Bull 12: 134-138.
[69]  Case TJ (1990) Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87: 9610-9614. doi:10.1073/pnas.87.24.9610. PubMed: 11607132.
[70]  Tilman D (1997) Community invisibility, recruitment limitations, and grassland biodiversity. Ecol 78: 81-92. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0081:CIRLAG]2?.0.CO;2.
[71]  Jacobs JS, Sheley RL (1999) Grass defoliation intensity, frequency, and season effects on spotted knapweed invasion. J Range Manag 52: 626-632. doi:10.2307/4003633.
[72]  Sheley RL, Half ML (2006) Enhancing native forb establishment and persistence using a rich seed mixture. Restor Ecol 12: 627-635.
[73]  Bowman GB, Harris LD (1980) Effect of spatial heterogeneity on ground-nest depredation. J Wildl Manage 44: 806-813. doi:10.2307/3808308.
[74]  Haffele RD (2012) Nesting ecology of ducks in dense nesting cover and restored native plantings in northeastern North Dakota. Thesis, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale.
[75]  Flint PL, Grand JB (1996) Nesting success of northern pintails on the coastal Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska. Condor 98: 54-60. doi:10.2307/1369508.
[76]  Emery RB, Howerter DW, Armstrong LM, Anderson MG, Devries JH et al. (2005) Seasonal variation in waterfowl nesting success and its relation to cover management in the Canadian prairies. J Wildl Manage 69: 1181-1193. doi:10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[1181:SVIWNS]2?.0.CO;2.
[77]  Sietman BE, Fothergill WB, Finck EJ (1994) Effects of haying and old-field succession on small mammals in tallgrass prairie. Am Midl Nat 131: 1-8. doi:10.2307/2426602.
[78]  Nocera JJ, Dawe KL (2008) Managing for habitat heterogeneity in grassland agro-ecosystems influences the abundance of masked shrews (Sorex cinereus). J Sustain Agric 32: 379-392. doi:10.1080/10440040802257132.
[79]  Voorhees LD, Cassel JF (1980) Highway right-of-way: mowing versus succession as related to duck nesting. J Wildl Manage 44: 155-163. doi:10.2307/3808361.
[80]  Holt RD (1977) Predation, apparent competition, and structure of prey communities. Theor Popul Biol 12: 197-229. doi:10.1016/0040-5809(77)90042-9. PubMed: 929457.
[81]  Norrdahl K, Korpim?ki E (2000) Do predators limit the abundance of alternative prey? Experiments with vole-eating avian and mammalian predators. Oikos 91: 528-540. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910315.x.
[82]  Brook RW, Pasitschniak-Arts M, Howerter DW, Messier F (2008) Influence of rodent abundance on nesting success of prairie waterfowl. Can J Zool 86: 497-506. doi:10.1139/Z08-019.
[83]  Devries JH, Armstrong LM (2011) Impact of management treatments on waterfowl use of dense nesting cover in the Canadian parklands. J Wildl Manage 75: 1340-1349. doi:10.1002/jwmg.164.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133