全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Winning the Genetic Lottery: Biasing Birth Sex Ratio Results in More Grandchildren

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067867

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Population dynamics predicts that on average parents should invest equally in male and female offspring; similarly, the physiology of mammalian sex determination is supposedly stochastic, producing equal numbers of sons and daughters. However, a high quality parent can maximize fitness by biasing their birth sex ratio (SR) to the sex with the greatest potential to disproportionately outperform peers. All SR manipulation theories share a fundamental prediction: grandparents who bias birth SR should produce more grandoffspring via the favored sex. The celebrated examples of biased birth SRs in nature consistent with SR manipulation theories provide compelling circumstantial evidence. However, this prediction has never been directly tested in mammals, primarily because the complete three-generation pedigrees needed to test whether individual favored offspring produce more grandoffspring for the biasing grandparent are essentially impossible to obtain in nature. Three-generation pedigrees were constructed using 90 years of captive breeding records from 198 mammalian species. Male and female grandparents consistently biased their birth SR toward the sex that maximized second-generation success. The most strongly male-biased granddams and grandsires produced respectively 29% and 25% more grandoffspring than non-skewing conspecifics. The sons of the most male-biasing granddams were 2.7 times as fecund as those of granddams with a 50:50 bias (similar results are seen in grandsires). Daughters of the strongest female-biasing granddams were 1.2 times as fecund as those of non-biasing females (this effect is not seen in grandsires). To our knowledge, these results are the first formal test of the hypothesis that birth SR manipulation is adaptive in mammals in terms of grandchildren produced, showing that SR manipulation can explain biased birth SR in general across mammalian species. These findings also have practical implications: parental control of birth SR has the potential to accelerate genetic loss and risk of extinction within captive populations of endangered species.

References

[1]  Fisher RA (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[2]  Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology. Science 156: 477–488.
[3]  West SA (2009) Sex allocation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. xii, 466 p.
[4]  Grant VJ (2007) Could maternal testosterone levels govern mammalian sex ratio deviations? Journal of Theoretical Biology 246: 708–719.
[5]  Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural-selection of parental ability to vary sex-ratio of offspring. Science 179: 90–92.
[6]  Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1984) Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex-ratios in red deer. Nature 308: 358–360.
[7]  Silk JB, Brown GR (2008) Local resource competition and local resource enhancement shape primate birth sex ratios. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 275: 1761–1765.
[8]  Clutton-Brock TH, Iason GR (1986) Sex-ratio variation in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology 61: 339–374.
[9]  Grant VJ (1996) Sex determination and the maternal dominance hypothesis. Human Reproduction 11: 2371–2375.
[10]  Cameron EZ (2004) Facultative adjustment of mammalian sex ratios in support of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: evidence for a mechanism. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 271: 1723–1728.
[11]  Cockburn A, Legge S, Double MC (2002) Sex ratios in birds and mammals: can the hypotheses be disentangled? In: Hardy ICW, editor. Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 266–286.
[12]  Gomendio M, Malo AF, Soler AJ, Fernandez-Santos MR, Esteso MC, et al. (2006) Male fertility and sex ratio at birth in red deer. Science 314: 1445–1447.
[13]  Cameron EZ, Dalerum F (2009) A Trivers-Willard effect in contemporary humans: male-biased sex ratios among billionaires. PLoS One 4: e4195.
[14]  Woodward M (1999) Epidemiology: study design and data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
[15]  Grafen A, Hails R (2002) Modern statistics for the life sciences. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. xv, 351 p.
[16]  Silk JB (1983) Local resource competition and facultative adjustment of sex-ratios in relation to competitive abilities. American Naturalist 121: 56–66.
[17]  Verme LJ, Ozoga JJ (1981) Sex-ratio of the white-tailed deer and the estrus cycle. Journal of Wildlife Management 45: 710–715.
[18]  Catalano R, Bruckner T, Anderson E, Gould JB (2005) Fetal death sex ratios: a test of the economic stress hypothesis. International Journal of Epidemiology 34: 944–948.
[19]  Sheldon BC, West SA (2004) Maternal dominance, maternal condition, and offspring sex ratio in ungulate mammals. American Naturalist 163: 40–54.
[20]  Cameron EZ, Linklater WL, Stafford KJ, Veltman CJ (1999) Birth sex ratios relate to mare condition at conception in Kaimanawa horses. Behavioral Ecology 10: 472–475.
[21]  Burke RL, Birch JM (1995) White-tailed deer vary offspring sex-ratio according to maternal condition and age. Ecological Research 10: 351–357.
[22]  Weatherhead PJ, Robertson RJ (1979) Offspring Quality and the Polygyny Threshold: “The Sexy Son Hypothesis”. The American Naturalist 113: 201–208.
[23]  Faust LJ, Thompson SD (2000) Birth sex ratio in captive mammals: Patterns, biases, and the implications for management and conservation. Zoo Biology 19: 11–25.
[24]  Glatston AR (1997) Sex ratio research in zoos and its implications for captive management. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 51: 209–216.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133