Background Initiation of transcription is essential for most of the cellular responses to environmental conditions and for cell and tissue specificity. This process is regulated through numerous proteins, their ligands and mutual interactions, as well as interactions with DNA. The key such regulatory proteins are transcription factors (TFs) and transcription co-factors (TcoFs). TcoFs are important since they modulate the transcription initiation process through interaction with TFs. In eukaryotes, transcription requires that TFs form different protein complexes with various nuclear proteins. To better understand transcription regulation, it is important to know the functional class of proteins interacting with TFs during transcription initiation. Such information is not fully available, since not all proteins that act as TFs or TcoFs are yet annotated as such, due to generally partial functional annotation of proteins. In this study we have developed a method to predict, using only sequence composition of the interacting proteins, the functional class of human TF binding partners to be (i) TF, (ii) TcoF, or (iii) other nuclear protein. This allows for complementing the annotation of the currently known pool of nuclear proteins. Since only the knowledge of protein sequences is required in addition to protein interaction, the method should be easily applicable to many species. Results Based on experimentally validated interactions between human TFs with different TFs, TcoFs and other nuclear proteins, our two classification systems (implemented as a web-based application) achieve high accuracies in distinguishing TFs and TcoFs from other nuclear proteins, and TFs from TcoFs respectively. Conclusion As demonstrated, given the fact that two proteins are capable of forming direct physical interactions and using only information about their sequence composition, we have developed a completely new method for predicting a functional class of TF interacting protein partners with high precision and accuracy.
References
[1]
Crick F (1970) Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227: 561–563.
[2]
Shamovsky I, Nudler E (2008) New insights into the mechanism of heat shock response activation. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 65: 855–861.
[3]
Lemons D, McGinnis W (2006) Genomic evolution of Hox gene clusters. Science 313: 1918–1922.
Goodrich JA, Tjian R (2010) Unexpected roles for core promoter recognition factors in cell-type-specific transcription and gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet 11: 549–558.
[6]
Schaefer U, Schmeier S, Bajic VB (2011) TcoF-DB: dragon database for human transcription co-factors and transcription factor interacting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D106–110.
[7]
Skrabanek L, Saini HK, Bader GD, Enright AJ (2008) Computational prediction of protein-protein interactions. Mol Biotechnol 38: 1–17.
[8]
Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, et al. (2011) The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D561–568.
[9]
Blow N (2009) Systems biology: Untangling the protein web. Nature 460: 415–418.
[10]
Ewing RM, Chu P, Elisma F, Li H, Taylor P, et al. (2007) Large-scale mapping of human protein-protein interactions by mass spectrometry. Mol Syst Biol 3: 89.
[11]
Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR (2007) Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part II. Computational methods to predict protein and domain interaction partners. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e43.
[12]
Keskin O, Gursoy A, Ma B, Nussinov R (2008) Principles of protein-protein interactions: what are the preferred ways for proteins to interact? Chem Rev 108: 1225–1244.
[13]
Zhou HX, Qin S (2007) Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment. Bioinformatics 23: 2203–2209.
[14]
Ezkurdia I, Bartoli L, Fariselli P, Casadio R, Valencia A, et al. (2009) Progress and challenges in predicting protein-protein interaction sites. Brief Bioinform 10: 233–246.
[15]
De Las Rivas J, Fontanillo C (2010) Protein-protein interactions essentials: key concepts to building and analyzing interactome networks. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000807.
[16]
Schmeier S, Jankovic B, Bajic VB (2011) Simplified method to predict mutual interactions of human transcription factors based on their primary structure. PLoS One 6: e21887.
[17]
Rausell A, Juan D, Pazos F, Valencia A (2010) Protein interactions and ligand binding: from protein subfamilies to functional specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 1995–2000.
[18]
Stormo GD, Zhao Y (2010) Determining the specificity of protein-DNA interactions. Nat Rev Genet 11: 751–760.
[19]
Ravasi T, Suzuki H, Cannistraci CV, Katayama S, Bajic VB, et al. (2010) An atlas of combinatorial transcriptional regulation in mouse and man. Cell 140: 744–752.
[20]
Glossary of Terms. Machine Learning 30: 271–274.
[21]
Consortium TU (2011) Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D214–D219.
[22]
Kawashima S, Ogata H, Kanehisa M (1999) AAindex: Amino Acid Index Database. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 368–369.
[23]
Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, et al. (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11: 10–18.
[24]
Tasan M, Tian W, Hill DP, Gibbons FD, Blake JA, et al. (2008) An en masse phenotype and function prediction system for Mus musculus. Genome Biol 9 Suppl 1S8.
