全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Advanced Mathematical Study and the Development of Conditional Reasoning Skills

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069399

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Since the time of Plato, philosophers and educational policy-makers have assumed that the study of mathematics improves one's general ‘thinking skills’. Today, this argument, known as the ‘Theory of Formal Discipline’ is used in policy debates to prioritize mathematics in school curricula. But there is no strong research evidence which justifies it. We tested the Theory of Formal Discipline by tracking the development of conditional reasoning behavior in students studying post-compulsory mathematics compared to post-compulsory English literature. In line with the Theory of Formal Discipline, the mathematics students did develop their conditional reasoning to a greater extent than the literature students, despite them having received no explicit tuition in conditional logic. However, this development appeared to be towards the so-called defective conditional understanding, rather than the logically normative material conditional understanding. We conclude by arguing that Plato may have been correct to claim that studying advanced mathematics is associated with the development of logical reasoning skills, but that the nature of this development may be more complex than previously thought.

References

[1]  Plato (375BC/2003) The Republic (DLee, Ed.). London: Penguin.
[2]  Locke J (1706/1971) Conduct of the Understanding. New York: Burt Franklin.
[3]  Sfard A (1998) A mathematician's view of research in mathematics education: An interview with Shimson A. Amitsur. In Sierpinska A., Kilpatrick J. Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (Vol. 2: , 445–458). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
[4]  National Research Council (2001) Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[5]  Walport M (2010) Science and Mathematics Secondary Education for the 21st Century: Report of the Science and Learning Expert Group. London: Crown.
[6]  National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
[7]  Smith A (2004) Making mathematics count: The report of Professor Adrian Smith's inquiry into post-14 mathematics education. London: The Stationery Office.
[8]  Stanic GMA (1986) The Growing Crisis in Mathematics Education in the Early Twentieth Century. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 17: 190–205.
[9]  Dolton PJ, Vignoles A (2002) The return on post-compulsory school mathematics study. Economica 69: 113–141.
[10]  Thorndike EL (1924) Mental discipline in high school studies. Journal of Educational Psychology 15: 1–22.
[11]  Owen AM, Hampshire A, Grahn JA, Stenton R, Dajani S, et al. (2010) Putting brain training to the test. Nature 465: 775–779.
[12]  Thorndike EL, Woodworth RS (1901) The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review 8: 247–261.
[13]  Cheng PW, Holyoak KJ, Nisbett RE, Oliver LM (1986) Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning. Cognitive Psychology 18: 293–328.
[14]  Wason PC (1968) Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20: 273–281.
[15]  Sperber D, Cara F, Girotto V (1995) Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 57: 31–96.
[16]  Sperber D, Girotto V (2002) Use or misuse of the selection task? Rejoinder to Fiddick, Cosmides, and Tooby. Cognition 85(3): 277–290.
[17]  Lehman DR, Nisbett RE (1990) A longitudinal study of the effects of undergraduate training on reasoning. Developmental Psychology 26: 952–960.
[18]  Inglis M, Simpson A (2009) Conditional inference and advanced mathematical study: Further evidence. Educational Studies in Mathematics 72: 185–198.
[19]  Evans JStBT, Clibbens J, Rood B (1995) Bias in conditional inference: implications for mental models and mental logic. The Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology 48A: 644–670.
[20]  Evans JStBT, Handley SJ, Neilens H, Over DE (2007) Thinking about conditionals: a study of individual differences. Memory & Cognition 35: 1772–1784.
[21]  Oakley CO (1946) Mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly 56: 19.
[22]  Wason PC (1966) Reasoning. In Foss B, New horizons in psychology (135–151). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
[23]  Braine MDS, O'Brien DP (1998) The theory of mental-propositional logic: Description and illustration. In Braine MDS, O'Brien DP, Mental logic (79–89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[24]  Evans JStBT, Handley SJ, Over DE (2003) Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29: 321–335.
[25]  Johnson-Laird PN, Byrne RMJ (2002) Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics and inference. Psychological Review 109: 646–678.
[26]  Newstead SE, Handley SJ, Harley C, Wright H, Farrelly D (2004) Individual differences in deductive reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A: 33–60.
[27]  Stanovich KE (2004) The Robot's Rebellion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[28]  Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE (2011) The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition 39: 1275–1289.
[29]  Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM (1999) Stereotype threat and women's math performance. American Psychologist 52: 613–629.
[30]  Assessment and Qualifications Alliance (2011) General Certificate of Education Mathematics Specification. Available: http://store.aqa.org.uk/qual/pdf/AQA-636?0-W-SP-12.PDF Accessed 2012 Nov 3.
[31]  Stanovich KE, Cunningham AE (1992) Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: the cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory & Cognition 20: 51–68.
[32]  Sá WC, West RF, Stanovich KE (1999) The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalisable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology 91: 497–510.
[33]  Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19: 25–42.
[34]  Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Feinstein JA, Jarvis WBG (1996) Individual differences in cognitive motivation: the life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 119: 197–253.
[35]  Inglis M, Attridge N, Batchelor S, Gilmore C (2011) Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 18: 1222–1229.
[36]  Epp S (2003) The role of logic in teaching proof. American Mathematical Monthly 110: 886–899.
[37]  Leron U (1985) A direct approach to indirect proofs. Educational Studies in Mathematics 16: 321–325.
[38]  Hodgen J, Pepper D, Sturman L, Ruddock G (2010) Is the UK an outlier: An international comparison of upper secondary mathematics education. London: Nuffield Foundation.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133