全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

What Took Them So Long? Explaining PhD Delays among Doctoral Candidates

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068839

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A delay in PhD completion, while likely undesirable for PhD candidates, can also be detrimental to universities if and when PhD delay leads to attrition/termination. Termination of the PhD trajectory can lead to individual stress, a loss of valuable time and resources invested in the candidate and can also mean a loss of competitive advantage. Using data from two studies of doctoral candidates in the Netherlands, we take a closer look at PhD duration and delay in doctoral completion. Specifically, we address the question: Is it possible to predict which PhD candidates will experience delays in the completion of their doctorate degree? If so, it might be possible to take steps to shorten or even prevent delay, thereby helping to enhance university competitiveness. Moreover, we discuss practical do's and don'ts for universities and graduate schools to minimize delays.

References

[1]  Feldon DF, Maher MA, Timmerman BE (2010) Performance-based data in the study of STEM PhD education. Science 329: 282–283.
[2]  Bourke A, Holbrook A, Lovat R, Farley P. (2004) Attrition, completion and completion times of PhD candidates. Melbourne: AARE Annual Conference proceedings.
[3]  Sadlak J. (2004) Doctoral studies and qualifications in Europe and the united states and prospects: UNESCO, Bucharest.
[4]  Van de Schoot R, Yerkes MA, Sonneveld H (2012) The employment status of doctoral recipients: An exploratory study in the Netherlands. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 7: 331.
[5]  European Commission (2007) Key data on higher education in Europe (2007 edition). Available: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eury?dice/documents/key_data_series/088EN.pdf. Accessed 2013 June 6.
[6]  Bair C, Hawort J. (2005) Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. In: JC Smart, editor. Higher Education: Handbook of theory and research. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands. 481–534.
[7]  Phillips EM, Pugh DS. (2010) How to get a PhD; chapter 4. United Kingdom: Open University Press.
[8]  Gardner SK (2009) Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the united states. Higher Education 58: 97–112.
[9]  Jiranek V (2010) Potential predictors of timely completion among dissertation research students at an Australian faculty of sciences. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 5: 1–13.
[10]  Wao HO, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2011) A mixed research investigation of factors related to time to the doctorate in education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 6: 116–134.
[11]  Wao HO (2010) Time to the doctorate: Multilevel discrete-time hazard analysis. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 22: 227–247.
[12]  Rodwell J, Neumann R (2008) predictors of timely doctoral student completions by type of attendance: The utility of a pragmatic approach. Journal of Higher Education and Policy Management 30: 65–76.
[13]  Kearns H, Gardiner M, Marshall K (2007) Innovation in PhD completion: The hardy shall succeed (and be happy!). Higher Education Research & Development 27: 77–89.
[14]  Latona K, Browne M. (2001) Factors associated with completion of research higher degrees. Higher Education Series 37.
[15]  Wright T, Cochrane R (2000) Factors influencing successful submission of PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education 25: 181–195.
[16]  Lovitts BE (2008) The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn't, and why. The Journal of Higher Education 79: 296–325.
[17]  Manathunga C (2005) Early warning signs in postgraduate research education: A different approach to ensuring timely completions. Teaching in Higher Education 10: 219–233.
[18]  OECD. (2012) Education database. Available: www.oecd.org Accessed 2013 June 6.
[19]  Hulshof MJF, Verrijt AHM, Kruijthof A. (1996) Promoveren en de arbeidsmarkt: Ervaringen van de ‘lost generation’ [PhD and the labor market experiences of the ‘lost generation’]. SDU: The Hague.
[20]  Yerkes MA, Van de Schoot R, Sonneveld H (2012) Genderongelijkheid in het Nederlandse promotiestelsel: Een verkennend onderzoek [Gender inequality in the dutch PhD system: An exploratory study]. Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies 3: 7–23.
[21]  Maher MA, Ford ME, Thompson CM (2004) Degree progress of women doctoral students: Factors that constrain, facilitate and differentiate. The Review of Higher Education 27: 385–408.
[22]  Seagram BC, Gould J, Pyke SW (1998) An investigation of gender and other variables on time to completion of doctoral degrees. Research in Higher Education 39: 319–335.
[23]  Waite L (1995) Does marriage matter? Demography 32: 483–507.
[24]  Shen H (2013) Inequality quantified: Mind the gender gap. Nature 495: 22–24.
[25]  Sonneveld H, Yerkes MA, Van de Schoot R. (2010) PhD trajectories and labour market mobility: A survey of recent doctoral recipients at four universities in the Netherlands. Utrecht: Nederlands Centrum voor de Promotieopleiding/IVLOS.
[26]  Muthén LK, Muthén BO. (2012) Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers users' guide.: Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
[27]  Muthén BO, Asparouhov T (2012) Bayesian SEM: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychol Methods 17: 313–335.
[28]  Dienes Z (2011) Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 274–290.
[29]  Kruschke J K (2011). Doing Bayesian Data Analysis. Burlingon: Academic Press.
[30]  Kaplan D, Depaoli S. (2012) Bayesian structural equation modeling. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guilford. 650–673.
[31]  Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. (2004) Bayesian data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
[32]  Sonneveld H, Hello E, van de Schoot R. (2011) Promovendimonitor 2011: Promovendi van de universiteit Utrecht. hun oordeel over opleiding, begeleiding en onderzoeksfaciliteiten [PhD monitor 2011: PhD from Utrecht university. their opinion on training, mentoring and research facilities]. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht: IVLOS. Available: http://www.phdcentre.eu/nl/publicaties/i?ndex.html. Accessed 2013 Jun 6.
[33]  Becker HS. (1998) Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you're doing it. University of Chicago Press.
[34]  Mastekaasa A (2005) Gender differences in educational attainment: The case of doctoral degrees in Norway. British Journal of Sociology of Education 26: 375–394.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133