Salt stress is one of the major abiotic stresses in agriculture worldwide. Analysis of natural genetic variation in Arabidopsis is an effective approach to characterize candidate salt responsive genes. Differences in salt tolerance of three Arabidopsis ecotypes were compared in this study based on their responses to salt treatments at two developmental stages: seed germination and later growth. The Sha ecotype had higher germination rates, longer roots and less accumulation of superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide than the Ler and Col ecotypes after short term salt treatment. With long term salt treatment, Sha exhibited higher survival rates and lower electrolyte leakage. Transcriptome analysis revealed that many genes involved in cell wall, photosynthesis, and redox were mainly down-regulated by salinity effects, while transposable element genes, microRNA and biotic stress related genes were significantly changed in comparisons of Sha vs. Ler and Sha vs. Col. Several pathways involved in tricarboxylic acid cycle, hormone metabolism and development, and the Gene Ontology terms involved in response to stress and defense response were enriched after salt treatment, and between Sha and other two ecotypes. Collectively, these results suggest that the Sha ecotype is preconditioned to withstand abiotic stress. Further studies about detailed gene function are needed. These comparative transcriptomic and analytical results also provide insight into the complexity of salt stress tolerance mechanisms.
References
[1]
Hasegawa P, Bressan R, Zhu J, Bohnert H (2000) Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu Rev Plant Physiol and Plant Mol Biol 51: 463–499.
[2]
Chan Z, Grumet R, Loescher W (2011) Global gene expression analysis of transgenic, mannitol-producing and salt tolerant Arabidopsis thaliana indicates widespread changes in expression of abiotic- and biotic-stress related genes. J Exp Bot 62: 4787–4803.
[3]
Chan Z, Bigelow PJ, Loescher W, Grumet R (2012) Comparison of salt stress resistance genes in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana indicates that extent of transcriptomic change may not predict secondary phenotypic or fitness effects. Plant Biotechnol J 10: 284–300.
Loescher W, Chan Z, Grumet R (2011) Options for Developing Salt Tolerant crops. HortScience 46: 1085–1092.
[6]
Zhifang G, Loesher W (2003) Expression of a celery mannose 6-phosphate reductase in Arabidopsis thaliana enhances salt tolerance and induces biosynthesis of both mannitol and a mannitol dimer. Plant Cell Environ 26: 275–283.
[7]
Shi H, Lee B, Wu S-J, Zhu J-K (2003) Overexpression of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nat Biotech 21: 81–85.
[8]
Kasuga M, Liu Q, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1999) Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat Biotech 17: 287–291.
[9]
Vallejo AJ, Yanovsky MJ, Botto J (2010) Germination variation in Arabidopsis thaliana accessions under moderate osmotic and salt stresses. Annal Bot 106: 833–842.
[10]
Shi H, Wang Y, Cheng Z, Ye T, Chan Z (2012) Analysis of natural variation in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) reveals physiological responses underlying drought tolerance. PLoS ONE 7: e53422.
Katori T, Ikeda A, Iuchi S, Kobayashi M, Shinozaki K, et al. (2010) Dissecting the genetic control of natural variation in salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions. J Exp Bot 61: 1125–1138.
[13]
DeRose-Wilson L, Gaut BS (2011) Mapping Salinity Tolerance during Arabidopsis thaliana germination and seedling growth. PLoS ONE 6: e22832.
[14]
Galpaz N, Reymond M (2010) Natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed a genetic network controlling germination under salt stress. PLoS ONE 5: e15198.
[15]
Ren Z, Zheng Z, Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Cui X, et al. (2010) RAS1, a quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance and ABA sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Proc Nat Acade Sci USA 107: 5669c5674.
[16]
Harada H, Leigh RA (2006) Genetic mapping of natural variation in potassium concentrations in shoots of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot 57: 953–960.
[17]
Rus A, Baxter I, Muthukumar B, Gustin J, Lahner B, et al. (2006) Natural variants of AtHKT1 enhance Na+ accumulation in two wild populations of Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics 2: e210.
[18]
Alonso-Blanco C, Koornneef M (2000) Naturally occurring variation in Arabidopsis: an underexploited resource for plant genetics. Trends Plant Sci 5: 22–29.
[19]
Millenaar F, Cox M, van Berkel Y, Welschen R, Pierik R, et al. (2005) Ethylene-induced differential growth of petioles in Arabidopsis: analyzing natural variation; response kinetics; and regulation. Plant Physiol 137: 998–1008.
[20]
Hannah MA, Wiese D, Freund S, Fiehn O, Heyer AG, et al. (2006) Natural genetic variation of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 142: 98–112.
[21]
Van Poecke RMP, Sato M, Lenarz-Wyatt L, Weisberg S, Katagiri F (2007) Natural variation in RPS2-mediated resistance among Arabidopsis genotypes: correlation between gene expression profiles and phenotypic responses. Plant Cell 19: 4046–4060.
[22]
Vuylsteke M, van Eeuwijk F, Van Hummelen P, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (2005) Genetic Analyses of Variation in Gene Expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 171: 1267–1275.
[23]
Van Leeuwen H, Kliebenstein D, West M, Kim K, Van Poecke R, et al. (2007) Natural variation among Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes for transcriptome response to exogenous salicylic acid. Plant Cell 19: 2099–2110.
[24]
Delker C, P？schl Y, Raschke A, Ullrich K, Ettingshausen S, et al. (2010) Natural variation of transcriptional auxin response networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22: 2184–2200.
[25]
Des Marais DL, McKay JK, Richards JH, Sen S, Wayne T, et al. (2012) Physiological genomics of response to soil drying in diverse Arabidopsis accessions. Plant Cell 24: 893–914.
[26]
Bouchabke O, Chang F, Simon M, Voisin R, Pelletier G, et al. (2008) Natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana as a tool for highlighting differential drought responses. PLoS One 3: e1705.
[27]
Kesari R, Lasky JR, Villamor JG, Des Marais DL, Chen YJC, et al. (2012) Intron-mediated alternative splicing of Arabidopsis P5CS1 and its association with natural variation in proline and climate adaptation. Proce Nat Acade Sci USA 109: 9197–9202.
[28]
Sharma S, Lin W, Villamor JG, Verslues PE (2013) Divergent low water potential response in Arabidopsis thaliana accessions Landsberg erecta and Shahdara. Plant Cell Environ 36: 994–1008.
[29]
Clerkx EJM, El-Lithy ME, Vierling E, Ruys GJ, Blankestijn-DeVries H, et al. (2004) Analysis of natural allelic variation of Arabidopsis seed germination and seed longevity traits between the accessions Landsberg erecta and Shakdara, using a new recombinant inbred line population. Plant Physiol 135: 432–443.
[30]
Trontin C, Tisne S, Bach L, Loudet O (2011) What does Arabidopsis natural variation teach us (and does not teach us) about adaptation in plants? Curr Opinn Plant Biol 14: 225–231.
[31]
Wang Y, Li L, Ye T, Zhao S, Liu Z, et al. (2011) Cytokinin antagonizes ABA suppression to seed germination of Arabidopsis by downregulating ABI5 expression. Plant J 68: 249–261.
[32]
Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu J-K (2006) Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 45: 523–539.
[33]
Ramel F, Sulmon C, Cabello-Hurtado F, Taconnat L, Martin-Magniette ML, et al. (2007) Genome-wide interacting effects of sucrose and herbicide-mediated stress in Arabidopsis thaliana: novel insights into atrazine toxicity and sucrose-induced tolerance. BMC Genomics 8: 450.
[34]
Hu L, Li H, Pang H, Fu J (2012) Responses of antioxidant gene, protein and enzymes to salinity stress in two genotypes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) differing in salt tolerance. J Plant Physiol 169: 149–156.
[35]
Ukeda H, Shimamura T, Tsubouchi M, Harada Y, Nakai Y, et al. (2002) Spectrophotometric assay of superoxide anion formed in Maillard reaction based on highly water-soluble tetrazolium salt. Analy Sci 18: 1151–1154.
[36]
Aebi HE (1983) Catalase. In: Bergmeyer HU, ed. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Vol. 3. 273-286. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.
[37]
Provart N, Zhu T (2003) A Browser-based Functional Classification SuperViewer for Arabidopsis Genomics. Curr Compu Mol Biol 2003: 271–272.
[38]
Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, et al. (2004) MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J 37: 914–939.
[39]
Carbon S, Ireland A, Mungall CJ, Shu S, Marshall B, et al. (2009) AmiGO Hub, Web Presence Working Group. AmiGO: Online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics 25: 288–289.
[40]
de Hoon MJL, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S (2004) Open Source Clustering Software. Bioinformatics 20: 1453–1454.
[41]
Chan Z (2012) Expression profiling of ABA pathway transcripts indicates crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Genomics 100: 110–115.
[42]
Gilmour SJ, Sebolt AM, Salazar MP, Everard JD, Thomashow MF (2000) Overexpression of the Arabidopsis CBF3 transcriptional activator mimics multiple biochemical changes associated with cold acclimation. Plant Physiol 124: 1854–1865.
[43]
Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7: 405–410.
[44]
Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55: 373–399.
[45]
McClintock B (1968) The states of a gene locus in maize. Carnegie Institute of Washington Yearbook 66: 20–28.
[46]
Whitelaw E, Martin DI (2001) Retrotransposons as epigenetic mediators of phenotypic variation in mammals. Nat Genetics 27: 361–365.
[47]
Schramke V, Allshire R (2003) Hairpin RNAs and retrotransposon LTRs effect RNAi and chromatin-vased gene silencing. Science 301: 1069–1074.
[48]
Khraiwesh B, Zhu J-K, Zhu JH (2012) Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 819: 137–148.
[49]
Kotak S, Port M, Ganguli A, Bicker F, Von Koskull-D？ring P (2004) Characterization of C-terminal domains of Arabidopsis heat stress transcription factors (Hsfs) and identification of a new signature combination of plant class A Hsfs with AHA and NES motifs essential for activator function and intracellular localization. Plant J 39: 98–112.
[50]
Nishizawa A, Yabuta Y, Yoshida E, Maruta T, Yoshimura K, et al. (2006) Arabidopsis heat shock transcription factor A2 as a key regulator in response to several types of environmental stress. Plant J 48: 535–547.
[51]
Prieto-Dapena P, Casta？o R, Almoguera C, Jordano J (2008) The ectopic overexpression of a seed-specific transcription factor, HaHSFA9, confers tolerance to severe dehydration in vegetative organs. Plant J 54: 1004–1014.
[52]
Becker A, Theissen G (2003) The major clades of MADS-box genes and their role in the development and evolution of flowering plants. Mol Phylogenetics Evol 29: 464–489.
[53]
Lee S, Woo YM, Ryu SI, Shin YD, Kim WT, et al. (2008) Further characterization of a rice AGL12 group MADS-box gene, OsMADS26. Plant Physiol 147: 156–168.
[54]
Jones-Rhoades MW, Bartel DP, Bartel B (2006) “MicroRNAS and their regulatory roles in plants”. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57: 19–53.
[55]
Dharmasiri N, Dharmasiri S, Estelle M (2005) The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435: 441–445.
[56]
Kepinski S, Leyser O (2005) The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 435: 446–451.
