The behavior of genetic motifs is determined not only by the gene-gene interactions, but also by the expression patterns of the constituent genes. Live single-molecule measurements have provided evidence that transcription initiation is a sequential process, whose kinetics plays a key role in the dynamics of mRNA and protein numbers. The extent to which it affects the behavior of cellular motifs is unknown. Here, we examine how the kinetics of transcription initiation affects the behavior of motifs performing filtering in amplitude and frequency domain. We find that the performance of each filter is degraded as transcript levels are lowered. This effect can be reduced by having a transcription process with more steps. In addition, we show that the kinetics of the stepwise transcription initiation process affects features such as filter cutoffs. These results constitute an assessment of the range of behaviors of genetic motifs as a function of the kinetics of transcription initiation, and thus will aid in tuning of synthetic motifs to attain specific characteristics without affecting their protein products.
References
[1]
Wolf DM, Arkin AP (2003) Motifs, modules and games in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol 6: 125–134.
[2]
Taniguchi Y, Choi PJ, Li GW, Chen H, Babu M, et al. (2010) Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329: 533–538.
[3]
Bernstein JA, Khodursky AB, Lin PH, Lin-Chao S, Cohen SN (2002) Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 9697–9702.
[4]
McClure WR (1985) Mechanism and control of transcription initiation in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Biochem 54: 171–204.
[5]
Lutz R, Lozinski T, Ellinger T, Bujard H (2001) Dissecting the functional program of Escherichia coli promoters: The combined mode of action of lac repressor and arac activator. Nucl Acids Res 29: 3873–3881.
[6]
Kandhavelu M, Mannerstrom H, Gupta A, Hakkinen A, Lloyd-Price J, et al. (2011) In vivo kinetics of transcription initiation of the lar promoter in Escherichia coli : Evidence for a sequential mechanism with two rate-limiting steps. BMC Syst Biol 5: 149.
[7]
Muthukrishnan AB, Kandhavelu M, Lloyd-Price J, Kudasov F, Chowdhury S, et al. (2012) Dynamics of transcription driven by the tetA promoter, one event at a time, in live Escherichia coli cells. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 8472–8483.
[8]
Pedraza JM, Paulsson J (2008) Effects of molecular memory and bursting on fluctuations in gene expression. Science 319: 339–343.
[9]
Ribeiro AS, Zhu R, Kauffman SA (2006) A general modeling strategy for gene regulatory networks with stochastic dynamics. J Comp Biol 13: 1630–1639.
[10]
Roussel MR, Zhu R (2006) Validation of an algorithm for delay stochastic simulation of transcription and translation in prokaryotic gene expression title. Phys Biol 3: 274–284.
deHaseth PL, Zupancic ML, Record MT Jr (1998) Rna polymerase-promoter interactions: The comings and goings of rna polymerase. J Bacteriol 180: 3019–3025.
[13]
Xia K, Manning M, Hesham H, Lin Q, Bystroff C, et al. (2007) Identifying the subproteome of kinetically stable proteins via diagonal 2D SDS/PAGE. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 17329–17334.
[14]
Dyson S, Gurdon JB (1998) The interpretation of position in a morphogen gradient as revealed by occupancy of activin receptors. Cell 93: 557–568.
[15]
Loinger A, Biham O (2007) Stochastic simulations of the repressilator circuit. Phys Rev E 76: 051917.
[16]
Kandhavelu M, H？kkinen A, Yli-Harja O, Ribeiro AS (2012) Single-molecule dynamics of transcription of the lar promoter. Phys Biol 9: 026004.
[17]
Ribeiro AS, Hakkinen A, Mannerstrom H, Lloyd-Price J, Yli-Harja O (2010) Effects of the promoter open complex formation on gene expression dynamics. Phys Rev E 81: 011912.
