全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

The Relationship between Media Consumption and Health-Related Anxieties after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065331

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster caused a global panic by a release of harmful radionuclides. In a disaster setting, misusage of contemporary media sources available today can lead to disseminated incorrect information and panic. The study aims to build a scale which examines associations between media and individual anxieties, and to propose effective media usages for future disaster management. Methods The University of Tokyo collaborated with the Fukushima local government to conduct a radiation-health-seminar for a total of 1560 residents, at 12 different locations in Fukushima. A 13 item questionnaire collected once before and after a radiation-seminar was used on factor analysis to develop sub-scales for multiple regression models, to determine relationships between the sub-scales and media type consumed. A paired t–test was used to examine any changes in sub-scale of pre- and post-seminar scores. Results Three sub-scales were revealed and were associated with different media types: was with rumors, while concern for the future was positively associated with regional-newspapers and negatively with national-newspapers. Anxiety about social-disruption was associated with radio. The seminar had a significant effect on anxiety reduction for all the three sub-scales. Conclusion Different media types were associated with various heightened concerns, and that a radiation seminar was helpful to reduce anxieties in the post-disaster setting. By tailoring post-disaster messages via specific media types, i.e., radio, it may be possible to effectively convey important information, as well as to calm fears about particular elements of post-disaster recovery and to combat rumors.

References

[1]  Bromet EJ (2011) Lessons learned from radiation disasters. World Psychiatry 10: 83–84.
[2]  American Red Cross (2011) Social Media in Disasters and Emergencies. American Red Cross.
[3]  Raphael B, Ma H (2011) Mass catastrophe and disaster psychiatry. Molecular Psychiatry 16: 247–251.
[4]  Barnes MD, Hanson CL, Novilla LM, Meacham AT, McIntyre E, et al. (2008) Analysis of media agenda setting during and after Hurricane Katrina: implications for emergency preparedness, disaster response, and disaster policy. American Journal of Public Health 98: 604–610.
[5]  Drottz-Sjoberg BM, Persson L (1993) Public reaction to radiation: fear, anxiety, or phobia? Health Physics 64: 223–231.
[6]  Slovic P (1996) Perception of risk from radiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 68: 165–180.
[7]  Friedman SM, Gorney CM, Egolf BP (1987) Reporting on Radiation - a Content-Analysis of Chernobyl Coverage. Journal of Communication 37: 58–67.
[8]  Brewin TB (1994) Chernobyl and the Media. British Medical Journal 309: 208–209.
[9]  Taira T, Hatoyama Y (2011) Nationalize the Fukushima Daiichi atomic plant. Nature 480: 313–314.
[10]  Smith J (2011) A long shadow over Fukushima. Nature 472: 7.
[11]  Kanayama T (2007) Community Ties and Revitalization: The Role of Community Radio in Japan. Tokyo: Keio University.
[12]  Shklovski I, Palen L, Sutton J (2008) Finding community through information and communication technology in disaster response.
[13]  Hosaka T (2011) Tohoku disaster sparks innovative social media responses. The Japan Times online. Tokyo, Japan.
[14]  Vance K, Howe W, Dellavalle RP (2009) Social Internet Sites as a Source of Public Health Information. Dermatologic Clinics 27: 133.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133