| [1] | Moore DW (2005) Three in four Americans believe in paranormal. Princeton: Gallup News Service. Available: http://www.gallup.com/poll/16915/three-f？our-americans-believe-paranormal.aspx. Accessed 2013 Jul 8.
|
| [2] | Newport F, Strausberg M (2001) Americans’ belief in psychic and paranormal phenomena is up over last decade. Princeton: Gallup News Service. Available: http://www.gallup.com/poll/4483/american？s-belief-psychic-paranormal-phenomena-ov？er-last-decade.aspx. Accessed 2013 Jul 8.
|
| [3] | Lilienfeld SO, Landfield K (2008) Science and Pseudoscience in law Enforcement: A User-Friendly Primer. Crim Justice Behav 35: 1215–1230.
|
| [4] | European Commission (2005) Special Eurobarometer 224: Europeans, science and technology. Brussels: Author.
|
| [5] | Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, Jüni P, D？rig S, et al. (2005) Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy and allopathy. The Lancet 366: 726–732.
|
| [6] | Freckelton I (2012) Death by homeopathy: issues for civil, criminal and coronial law and for health service policy. J Law Med 19: 454–478.
|
| [7] | Matute H, Yarritu I, Vadillo MA (2011) Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience. Brit J Psychol 102: 392–405.
|
| [8] | Shermer M (1997) Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition and other confusions of our time. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.
|
| [9] | Hamilton DL, Gifford RK (1976) Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. J Exp Soc Psychol 12: 392–407.
|
| [10] | Lilienfeld SO, Ammirati R, Landfield K (2009) Giving debiasing away: Can psychological research on correcting cognitive errors promote human welfare? Perspect Psychol Sci 4: 390–398.
|
| [11] | Hume D (1987) A treatise of human nature (2nd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1739).
|
| [12] | Allan LG (1980) A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bull Psychon Soc 15: 147–149.
|
| [13] | Jenkins HM, Ward WC (1965) Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychol Monogr 79: 1–17.
|
| [14] | Cheng P (1997) From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychol Rev 104: 367–405.
|
| [15] | Shanks DR, Dickinson A (1987) Associative accounts of causality judgment. In GH Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA.: Academic Press. Vol. 21 pp. 229–261.
|
| [16] | Wasserman EA (1990) Detecting response-outcome relations: Toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment. In GH Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Vol. 26 pp. 27–82.
|
| [17] | Wasserman EA, Elek SM, Chatlosh DL, Baker AG (1993) Rating causal relations: Role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19: 174–188.
|
| [18] | Alloy LB, Abramson LY (1979) Judgements of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser? J Exp Psychol Gen 108: 441–485.
|
| [19] | Buehner MJ, Cheng PW, Clifford D (2003) From covariation to causation: A test of the assumption of causal power. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29: 1119–1140.
|
| [20] | Hannah S, Beneteau JL (2009) Just tell me what to do: Bringing back experimenter control in active contingency tasks with the command-performance procedure and finding cue density effects along the way. Can J Exp Psychol 63: 59–73.
|
| [21] | Matute H (1995) Human reactions to uncontrollable outcomes: Further evidence for superstitions rather than helplessness. Q J Exp Psychol 48: 142–157.
|
| [22] | Msetfi RM, Murphy RA, Simpson J, Kornbrot DE (2005) Depressive realism and outcome density bias in contingency judgments: the effect of the context and inter-trial interval. J Exp Psychol Gen 134: 10–22.
|
| [23] | Vallée-Tourangeau F, Murphy RA, Baker AG (2005) Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements. Q J Exp Psychol 58: 177–192.
|
| [24] | Blanco F, Matute H, Vadillo MA (2011) Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: The role of action in the illusion of control. Q J Exp Psychol 64: 1290–1304.
|
| [25] | Matute H (1996) Illusion of control: Detecting response-outcome independence in analytic but not in naturalistic conditions. Psychol Sci 7: 289–293.
|
| [26] | Anderson JR, Sheu C (1995) Causal inferences as perceptual judgments. Mem Cognit 23: 510–524.
|
| [27] | Catena A, Maldonado A, Cándido A (1998) The effect of frequency of judgment and the type of trials on covariation learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24: 481–495.
|
| [28] | Kao S-F, Wasserman EA (1993) Assessment of an information integration account of contingency judgment with examination of subjective cell importance and method of information presentation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19: 1363–1386.
|
| [29] | Mandel DR, Lehman DR (1998) Integration of Contingency Information in Judgments of Cause, Covariation, and Probability. J Exp Psychol Gen 3: 269–285.
|
| [30] | Perales JC, Shanks DR (2007) Models of covariation-based causal judgment: A review and synthesis. Psychon Bull Rev 14: 577–596.
|
| [31] | Schustack MW, Sternberg RJ (1981) Evaluation of evidence in causal inference. J Exp Psychol Gen 110: 101–120.
|
| [32] | White PA (2003) Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: The pCI rule. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29: 710–727.
|
| [33] | McKenzie CRM, Mikkelsen L A (2007) A Bayesian view of covariation assessment. Cognitive Psychol 54: 33–61.
|
| [34] | Blanco F, Matute H, Vadillo MA (2012) Mediating Role of Activity Level in the Depressive Realism Effect. PLoS One 7(9): e46203.
|
| [35] | Klayman J, Ha Y-W (1987) Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychol Rev 94: 211–228.
|
| [36] | Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2: 175–220.
|
| [37] | Fiedler K, Walther E, Nickel S (1999) The Auto-Verification of Social Hypotheses: Stereotyping and the Power of Sample Size. J Pers Soc Psychol 77: 5–18.
|
| [38] | Klayman J, Ha Y-W (1989) Hypothesis Testing in Rule Discovery: Strategy, Structure, and Content. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15: 596–604.
|
| [39] | Mynatt CR, Doherty ME, Tweney RD (1977) Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inferences. Q J Exp Psychol 29: 85–95.
|
| [40] | Snyder M, Swann WB (1978) Hypothesis testing processes in social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 36: 1202–1212.
|
| [41] | Wason PC (1960) On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. Q J Exp Psychol 12: 129–140.
|
| [42] | McKenzie CRM (2005) Judgment and decision making. In K Lamberts & RL Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of cognition. London: Sage. 321–338 pp.
|
| [43] | McLean CP, Miller NA (2010) Changes in critical thinking following a course on science and pseudoscience: A quasi-experimental study. Teach Psychol 37: 85–90.
|
| [44] | Morier D, Keeports D (1994) Normal science and the paranormal: The effect of a scientific method course on students' beliefs in the paranormal. Res High Educ 35: 443–453.
|
| [45] | Wesp R, Montgomery K (1998) Developing critical thinking through the study of paranormal phenomena. Teach Psychol 25: 275–278.
|
| [46] | Bloom P, Weisberg DS (2007) Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science 316: 996–997.
|
| [47] | Arkes H (1991) Costs and benefits of judgment errors: Implications for debiasing. Psychol Bull 110: 486–498.
|
| [48] | Larrick RP (2004) Debiasing. In DJ Koehler & N Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell. 316–338 pp.
|
| [49] | Lilienfeld SO, Ammirati R, David M (2012) Distinguishing science from pseudoscience in school psychology: Science and scientific thinking as safeguards against human error. J Sch Psychol 50: 7–36.
|
| [50] | Pronin E, Gilovich T, Ross L (2004) Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychol Rev 111: 781–799.
|
| [51] | Pronin E, Lin DY, Ross L (2002) The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28: 369–381.
|
| [52] | Harkness AR, DeBono KG, Borgida E (1985) Personal involvement and strategies for making contingency judgments: A stake in the dating game makes a difference. J Pers Soc Psycho 49: 22–32.
|
| [53] | Porcari J, Hazuga R, Foster C, Doberstein S, Becker J, et al. (2011) Can the power balance？ bracelet improve balance, flexibility, strength, and power?. J Sports Sci Med 10: 230–231.
|
| [54] | Brice SR, Jarosz BS, Ames RA, Baglin J, Da Costa C (2011) The effect of close proximity holographic wristbands on human balance and limits of stability: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 15: 298–303.
|
| [55] | Fong GT, Krantz DH, Nisbett RE (1986) The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems, Cogn Psychol. 18: 253–92.
|
| [56] | Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51: 1173–1182.
|
| [57] | Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological Methodology. Washington DC: American Sociological Association. 290–312 pp.
|
| [58] | Lehman DR, Nisbett RE (1990) A longitudinal study of the effects of undergraduate education on reasoning. Dev Psychol 26: 952–60.
|
| [59] | Lehman DR, Lempert RO, Nisbett RE (1988) The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events. Am Psychol 43: 431–442.
|
| [60] | Shanks DR (1991) On similarities between causal judgments in experienced and described situations. Psychol Sci 2: 341–350.
|
| [61] | Beckers T, De Houwer J, Matute H (2007) Editorial: Human contingency learning. Q J Exp Psychol 60: 289–290.
|
| [62] | Kahneman D (2003) A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 58: 697–720.
|
| [63] | American Association for the Advancement of Science, AAAS (n/d). Project 2061: A long-term AAAS initiative to advance literacy in Science, Mathematics, and Technology.Available: http://www.project2061.org/Accessed 2013 Jul 8.
|
| [64] | Confederación de Sociedades Científicas Espa？olas, COSCE (n/d). Proyecto ENCIENDE: ENse？anza de las CIENcias en la Didáctica Escolar.Available: http://enciende.cosce.org/Accessed 2013 Jul 8.
|
| [65] | Lilienfeld SO (2008) Can psychology save the world? British Psychological Society Research Digest. Available: http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/？2007/09/can-psychology-save-world.html. Accessed 2013 Jul 8.
|
