Objective Previous studies have shown that estimations of the calorie content of an unhealthy main meal food tend to be lower when the food is shown alongside a healthy item (e.g. fruit or vegetables) than when shown alone. This effect has been called the negative calorie illusion and has been attributed to averaging the unhealthy (vice) and healthy (virtue) foods leading to increased perceived healthiness and reduced calorie estimates. The current study aimed to replicate and extend these findings to test the hypothesized mediating effect of ratings of healthiness of foods on calorie estimates. Methods In three online studies, participants were invited to make calorie estimates of combinations of foods. Healthiness ratings of the food were also assessed. Results The first two studies failed to replicate the negative calorie illusion. In a final study, the use of a reference food, closely following a procedure from a previously published study, did elicit a negative calorie illusion. No evidence was found for a mediating role of healthiness estimates. Conclusion The negative calorie illusion appears to be a function of the contrast between a food being judged and a reference, supporting the hypothesis that the negative calorie illusion arises from the use of a reference-dependent anchoring and adjustment heuristic and not from an ‘averaging’ effect, as initially proposed. This finding is consistent with existing data on sequential calorie estimates, and highlights a significant impact of the order in which foods are viewed on how foods are evaluated.
References
[1]
Chernev A (2011) The Dieter’s Paradox. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21: 178–183.
[2]
Chernev A, Gal D (2010) Categorization Effects in Value Judgments: Averaging Bias in Evaluating Combinations of Vices and Virtues. Journal of Marketing Research 47: 738–747.
[3]
Adams J, Tyrrell R, White M (2011) Do television food advertisements portray advertised foods in a ‘healthy’ food context? British Journal of Nutrition 105: 810–815.
[4]
Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med 2: e124.
[5]
Pashler H, Wagenmakers E-J (2012) Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science A Crisis of Confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 528–530.
[6]
Horton J, Rand D, Zeckhauser R (2011) The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics: 1–27.
[7]
Karlsson J, Persson LO, Sjostrom L, Sullivan M (2000) Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ) in obese men and women. Results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24: 1715–1725.
[8]
Rozin P, Ashmore M, Markwith M (1996) Lay American conceptions of nutrition: dose insensitivity, categorical thinking, contagion, and the monotonic mind. Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 15: 438–447.
[9]
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.
[10]
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458.
[11]
Chernev A (2011) Semantic Anchoring in Sequential Evaluations of Vices and Virtues. Journal of Consumer Research 37: 761–774.
[12]
Chandon P, Wansink B (2007) The Biasing Health Halos of Fast-Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption Intentions. Journal of Consumer Research 34: 301–314.
[13]
Wansink B, Chandon P (2006) Can ‘Low-Fat’ Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity? Journal of Marketing Research 43: 605–617.
[14]
Begley CG, Ellis LM (2012) Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483: 531–533.
[15]
Makel MC, Plucker JA, Hegarty B (2012) Replications in Psychology Research How Often Do They Really Occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science 7: 537–542.
[16]
Doyen S, Klein O, Pichon C-L, Cleeremans A (2012) Behavioral Priming: It’s All in the Mind, but Whose Mind? PLoS ONE 7: e29081.
[17]
Bargh JA, Chen M, Burrows L (1996) Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 230–244.
[18]
Bem DJ (2011) Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100: 407–425.
[19]
Ritchie SJ, Wiseman R, French CC (2012) Failing the Future: Three Unsuccessful Attempts to Replicate Bem’s ‘Retroactive Facilitation of Recall’ Effect. PLoS ONE 7.
