全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077552

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Objective Racism is related to policies preferences and behaviors that adversely affect blacks and appear related to a fear of blacks (e.g., increased policing, death penalty). This study examined whether racism is also related to gun ownership and opposition to gun controls in US whites. Method The most recent data from the American National Election Study, a large representative US sample, was used to test relationships between racism, gun ownership, and opposition to gun control in US whites. Explanatory variables known to be related to gun ownership and gun control opposition (i.e., age, gender, education, income, conservatism, anti-government sentiment, southern vs. other states, political identification) were entered in logistic regression models, along with measures of racism, and the stereotype of blacks as violent. Outcome variables included; having a gun in the home, opposition to bans on handguns in the home, support for permits to carry concealed handguns. Results After accounting for all explanatory variables, logistic regressions found that for each 1 point increase in symbolic racism there was a 50% increase in the odds of having a gun at home. After also accounting for having a gun in the home, there was still a 28% increase in support for permits to carry concealed handguns, for each one point increase in symbolic racism. The relationship between symbolic racism and opposition to banning handguns in the home (OR1.27 CI 1.03,1.58) was reduced to non-significant after accounting for having a gun in the home (OR1.17 CI.94,1.46), which likely represents self-interest in retaining property (guns). Conclusions Symbolic racism was related to having a gun in the home and opposition to gun control policies in US whites. The findings help explain US whites’ paradoxical attitudes towards gun ownership and gun control. Such attitudes may adversely influence US gun control policy debates and decisions.

References

[1]  Hoyert DL, Xu J (2012) Deaths: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep 61: 1–65.
[2]  UN Office on Drugs and Crimes website. United Nations surveys on crime trends and the operations of criminal justice systems. Available: www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysi?s/statistics/Homicide/Homicides_by_firea?rms.xls. Accessed 2013 May 5.
[3]  Smith TW (2001) National gun policy survey of the national opinion research centre: Research findings. Chicago: University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center.
[4]  Pew Research Center (2013) Perspectives of Gun Owners, Non-Owners: Why Own a Gun? Protection Is Now Top Reason. Pew Research Center. http://www.people-press.org/2013/03/12/w?hy-own-a-gun-protection-is-now-top-reaso?n/Accessed 27/03/2013.
[5]  Lott JR (2010) More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun-control laws. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[6]  Kellermann AL, Rivara FP, Rushforth NB, Banton JG, Reay DT, et al. (1993) Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home. N Engl J Med 329: 1084–91.
[7]  Kellermann AL, Rivara FP, Somes G, Reay DT, Francisco J, et al. (1992) Suicide in the home in relation to gun ownership. N Engl J Med 327: 467–72.
[8]  Chapman S, Alpers P, Agho K, Jones M (2006) Australia’s 1996 gun law reforms: faster falls in firearm deaths, firearm suicides, and a decade without mass shootings. Inj Prev 12: 365–372.
[9]  Leenaars AA, Moksony F, Lester D, Wenckstern S (2003) The impact of gun control (Bill C-51) on suicide in Canada. Death Stud 27: 103–124.
[10]  Leigh A, Neill C (2012) Do gun buybacks save lives? Evidence from panel data. Am Law Econ Rev 12: 462–508.
[11]  McCarthy M (2013) Reviving research into US gun violence. BMJ 346: f980.
[12]  Davies E (2013) If guns don’t kill people, ignorance might. BMJ 346: f1058.
[13]  Winkler A (2011) Gunfight: The Battle Over the Right to Bear Arms in America. New York, N.Y. London: W.W. Norton.
[14]  Pew Research Center (2013) Gun Rights Proponents More Politically Active: In Gun Control Debate, Several Options Draw Majority Support. Pew Research Center http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy?-pdf/01-14-13%20Gun%20Policy%20Release.p?df Accessed 18/05/2013.
[15]  Benforado A (2010) Quick on the draw: Implicit bias and the second amendment. Oregon Law Rev 89: 1–81.
[16]  Kleck G, Kovandzic T, Saber M, Hauser W (2010) The effect of perceived risk and victimization on plans to purchase a gun for self-protection J Crim Just. 39: 312–319.
[17]  Sears DO, Henry PJ (2005) Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 37: 95–150.
[18]  Barkan S, Cohn SE (2005) Why Whites Favor Spending More Money to Fight Crime: The Role of Racial Prejudice. Soc Probl 52: 300–315.
[19]  Hurwitz J, Peffley M (1997) Public Perceptions of Race and Crime: The Role of Racial Stereotypes. Am J Polit Sci 41: 374–401.
[20]  Kahan DM, Braman D (2002) More Statistics, Less Persuasion: A Cultural Theory of Gun-Risk Perceptions. U Penn Law Rev 151: 1291.
[21]  Greenwald AG, Poehlman TA, Uhlmann EL, Banaji MR (2003) Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 97: 17–41.
[22]  Lane KA, Kang J, Banaji MR (2007) Implicit social cognition and law. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci 3: 427–451.
[23]  Knowles ED, Lowery BS, Schaumberg RL (2010) Racial prejudice predicts opposition to Obama and his health care reform plan. J Exp Soc Psy 46: 420–423.
[24]  Henderson M, Hillygus DS (2011) The Dynamics of Health Care Opinion, 2008–2010: Partisanship, Self-Interest, and Racial Resentment. J Health Polit Pol Law 36: 945–960.
[25]  Rabinowitz JL, Sears DO, Sidanius J, Krosnick JA (2009) Why do white Americans oppose race-targeted policies? Clarifying the impact of symbolic racism. Polit Psychol 30: 805–828.
[26]  Campbell A (1971) White attitudes toward black people. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
[27]  Crosby F, Bromley S, Saxe L (1980) Recent unobtrusive studies of Black and White discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychol Bull 87: 546–563.
[28]  McConahay J (1986) Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. Gaertner & S. Dovidio (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism. Orlando, FL. Academic Press. 91–125.
[29]  Sears DO, Henry PJ (2003) The origins of symbolic racism. J Pers Soc Psychol 85: 259–275.
[30]  Chiricos T, Welch K, Gertz M (2004) Racial typification of crime and support for punitive measures. Criminology 42: 359–390.
[31]  Berg JA (2013) Opposition to Pro-Immigrant Public Policy: Symbolic Racism and Group Threat. Soc Inq 83: 1–31.
[32]  Tarman C, Sears DO (2005) The conceptualization and measurement of symbolic racism. J Polit 63: 731–761.
[33]  Sears D, Van Laar C, Carillo M, Kosterman R (1997) Is it really racism? The origins of White Americans’ opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opin Quart 61: 16–53.
[34]  Green EGT, Staerklé C, Sears DO (2006) Symbolic racism and whites’ attitudes towards punitive and preventive crime policies. Law Human Behav 30: 435–54.
[35]  DeBell M, Krosnick JA, Lupia A (2010) Methodology Report and User Guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Stanford Univ. and Univ. Michigan.
[36]  Nicholson SP, Segura GM (2012) Who’s the Party of the People? Economic Populism and the U.S. Public’s Beliefs About Political Parties. Political Behavior 34: 369–389.
[37]  Henry PJ, Sears DO (2002) The Symbolic Racism 2000 Scale. Polit Psychol 23: 253–283.
[38]  Kleck G (1996) Crime, Culture Conflict and the Sources of Support for Gun Control: A Multilevel Application of the General Social Surveys. Am Behav Sci 39: 387–404.
[39]  Blanton H, Jaccard J, Klick J, Mellers B, Mitchell G, et al. (2009) Strong claims and weak evidence: reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT. J Appl Psychol 94: 567–582.
[40]  Mitchell G, Tetlock PE (2006) Antidiscrimination law and the perils of mindreading. Ohio State Law J 67: 1023–1121.
[41]  Rothermund K, Wentura D, De Houwer J (2005) Validity of the salience asymmetry account of the Implicit Association Test: Reply to Greenwald, Nosek, Banaji, and Klauer (2005). J Exper Psychol: Gen 134: 426–430.
[42]  Vanman EJ, Saltz JL, Nathan LR, Warren JA (2004) Racial discrimination by low prejudiced Whites: Facial movements as implicit measures of attitudes related to behavior. Psychol Science 11: 711–714.
[43]  Rezaei AR (2011) Validity and Reliability of the IAT: Measuring Gender and Ethnic Stereotypes. Comput Human Behav 27: 1937–1941.
[44]  Sabin JA, Nosek BA, Greenwald AG, Rivara FP (2009) Physicians’ implicit and explicit attitudes about race by MD race, ethnicity, and gender. J Health Care Poor Underserved 20: 896–913.
[45]  Kinder DR, Ryan TJ (2012) Prejudice and Politics Re-Examined: The Political Significance of Implicit Racial Bias. Prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. New Orleans.
[46]  Klinesmith J, Kasser T, McAndrew FT (2006) Guns, Testosterone, and Aggression An Experimental Test of a Mediational Hypothesis. Psychol Science 17: 568–571.
[47]  Felson R, Paré P (2010) Firearms and Fisticuffs: Region, Race, and Adversary Effects on Homicide and Assault. Soc Sci Res 39: 272–284.
[48]  Tang H, Cowling DW, Lloyd JC, Rogers T, Koumjian KL, et al. (2003) Changes of attitudes and patronage behaviors in response to a smoke-free bar law. J Information 93: 611–617.
[49]  Heloma A, Jaakkola MS (2003) Four year follow up of smoke exposure, attitudes and smoking behaviour following enactment of Finland’s national smoke free work place law. Addiction 98: 1111–1117.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133