全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Dual Processes of Oculomotor Capture by Abrupt Onset: Rapid Involuntary Capture and Sluggish Voluntary Prioritization

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080678

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The present study showed that there are two distinctive processes underlying oculomotor capture by abrupt onset. When a visual mask between the cue and the target eliminates the unique luminance transient of an onset, the onset still attracts attention in a top-down fashion. This memory-based prioritization of onset is voluntarily controlled by the knowledge of target location. But when there is no visual mask between the cue and the target, the onset captures attention mainly in a bottom-up manner. This transient-driven capture of onset is involuntary because it occurs even when the onset is completely irrelevant to the target location. In addition, the present study demonstrated distinctive temporal characteristics for these two processes. The involuntary capture driven by luminance transients is rapid and brief, whereas the memory-based voluntary prioritization of onset is more sluggish and long-lived.

References

[1]  Yantis S, Jonides J (1984) Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 10: 601–621.
[2]  Yantis S, Jonides J (1990) Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 16: 121–134.
[3]  Theeuwes J (1991) Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics 49: 83–90.
[4]  Theeuwes J (2004) Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11: 65–70.
[5]  Abrams RA, Christ SE (2003) Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science 14: 427–432.
[6]  Abrams RA, Christ SE (2005) The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003) Perception & Psychophysics. 67: 219–223.
[7]  Yantis S (1993) Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2: 156–161.
[8]  Du F, Abrams RA (2009) Onset capture requires attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16: 537–541.
[9]  Theeuwes J, Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE (1998) Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science 9: 379–385.
[10]  Theeuwes J, Kramer AF, Hahn S, Irwin DE, Zelinsky GJ (1999) Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 25: 1595–1608.
[11]  Ludwig CJH, Ranson A, Gilchrist I (2008) Oculomotor capture by transient events: A comparison of abrupt onsets, offsets, motion and flicker. Journal of Vision 8(14):11, 1–16
[12]  Irwin DE, Colcombe AM, Kramer AF & Hahn S (2010) Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons. Visual Research 40: 1443–1458.
[13]  Matsukura M, Brockmole JR, Henderson JM (2009) Overt attentional prioritization of new objects and feature changes during real-world scene viewing. Visual Cognition 17: 835–855.
[14]  Franconeri SL, Hollingworth A, Simons DJ (2005) Do new objects capture attention? Psychological Science 16: : 275 –281.
[15]  Hollingworth A, Simons DJ, Franconeri SL (2010) New objects do not capture attention without a sensory transient. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72(5): 1298–1310.
[16]  Davoli C, Suszko J, Abrams R (2007) New objects can capture attention without a unique luminance transient. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 14: 338–343.
[17]  Yantis S, Hillstrom AP (1994) Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 20: 95–107.
[18]  Christ SE, Abrams RA (2006) Just like new: Newly segregated old objects capture attention. Perception & Psychophysics 68: 301–309.
[19]  Enns JT, Austen EL, Di Lollo V, Rauschenberger R, Yantis S (2001) New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 27: 1287–1302.
[20]  Yantis S, Jonides J (1996) Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: New perceptual objects or visual masking? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 22: 1505–1513.
[21]  Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC (1992) Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 18: 1030–1044.
[22]  Folk CL, Remington RW, Wright JH (1994) The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 20: 317–329.
[23]  Du F, Abrams RA (2008) Synergy of stimulus-driven salience and goal-directed prioritization: Evidence from the spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics 70: 1489–1503.
[24]  Du F, Abrams RA (2010) Visual field asymmetry in attentional capture. Brain & Cognition 72: 310–316.
[25]  Du F, Abrams RA (2012) Out of control: Attentional selection for orientation is thwarted by properties of the underlying neural mechanisms. Cognition 124: 361–366.
[26]  Du F, Yang J, Yin Y, Zhang K, Abrams RA (in press) On the automaticity of contingent capture: disruption caused by the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
[27]  Folk CL, Leber AB, Egeth HE (2002) Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics 64: 741–753.
[28]  Gibson BS, Kelsey EM (1998) Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 24: 699–706.
[29]  Christ SE, Abrams RA (2006) Abrupt onsets cannot be ignored. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13: 875–880.
[30]  Brockmole JR, Henderson JM (2005) Objects appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12: 1061–1067.
[31]  Brockmole JR, Henderson JM (2005) Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 31: 857–868.
[32]  Brockmole JR, Henderson JM (2008) Prioritizing new objects for eye fixation in real-world scenes: Effects of object-scene consistency. Visual Cognition 16: 375–390.
[33]  Henderson JM, Brockmole JR, Gajewski DA (2008) Differential detection of global luminance and contrast changes across saccades and flickers during active scene perception. Vision Research 48: 16–29.
[34]  Ludwig CJH, Gilchrist I (2002) Stimulus-driven and Goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception & Performance 28: 902–912.
[35]  Ludwig CJH, Gilchrist I (2003) Goal-driven modulation of oculomotor capture. Perception & Psychophysics 65: 1243–1251.
[36]  Du F, Abrams RA (2010) Endogenous orienting is reduced during the attentional blink. Experimental Brain Research 205: 115–121.
[37]  Matsukura M, Brockmole JR, Boot WR, Henderson JM (2011) Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load. Vision Research 51: 546–552.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133