Neo-Darwinian evolution has presented a paradigm for population dynamics built on random mutations and selection with a clear separation of time-scales between single-cell mutation rates and the rate of reproduction. Laboratory experiments on evolving populations until now have concentrated on the fixation of beneficial mutations. Following the Darwinian paradigm, these experiments probed populations at low temporal resolution dictated by the rate of rare mutations, ignoring the intermediate evolving phenotypes. Selection however, works on phenotypes rather than genotypes. Research in recent years has uncovered the complexity of genotype-to-phenotype transformation and a wealth of intracellular processes including epigenetic inheritance, which operate on a wide range of time-scales. Here, by studying the adaptation dynamics of genetically rewired yeast cells, we show a novel type of population dynamics in which the intracellular processes intervene in shaping the population structure. Under constant environmental conditions, we measure a wide distribution of growth rates that coexist in the population for very long durations (>100 generations). Remarkably, the fastest growing cells do not take over the population on the time-scale dictated by the width of the growth-rate distributions and simple selection. Additionally, we measure significant fluctuations in the population distribution of various phenotypes: the fraction of exponentially-growing cells, the distributions of single-cell growth-rates and protein content. The observed fluctuations relax on time-scales of many generations and thus do not reflect noisy processes. Rather, our data show that the phenotypic state of the cells, including the growth-rate, for large populations in a constant environment is metastable and varies on time-scales that reflect the importance of long-term intracellular processes in shaping the population structure. This lack of time-scale separation between the intracellular and population processes calls for a new framework for population dynamics which is likely to be significant in a wide range of biological contexts, from evolution to cancer.
References
[1]
Elena SF, Lenski RE (2003) Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases of adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 4: 457–69.
[2]
Fisher RA (1999) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection: A Complete Variorum Edition. Oxford University Press. 318 p.
[3]
Hallatschek O (2011) The noisy edge of traveling waves. PNAS 108: 1783–7.
[4]
Lang GI, Botstein D, Desai MM (2011) Genetic variation and the fate of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Genetics 188: 647–61.
[5]
Orr HA (2005) The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat Rev Genet 6: 119–27.
[6]
Paquin C, Adams J (1983) Frequency of fixation of adaptive mutations is higher in evolving diploid than haploid yeast populations. Nature 302: 495–500.
[7]
Park S-C, Simon D, Krug J (2010) The Speed of Evolution in Large Asexual Populations. J Stat Phys 138: 381–410.
[8]
Rouzine IM, Brunet E, Wilke CO (2008) The traveling-wave approach to asexual evolution: Muller's ratchet and speed of adaptation. Theor Popul Biol 73: 24–46.
[9]
Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ (2010) Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations. Phil Trans R Soc B 365: 1255–63.
[10]
Barrick JE, Yu DS, Yoon SH, Jeong H, Oh TK, et al. (2009) Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature 461: 1243–7.
[11]
Desai MM, Fisher DS, Murray AW (2007) The speed of evolution and maintenance of variation in asexual populations. Curr Biol 17: 385–94.
[12]
Tsimring LS, Levine H, Kessler DA (1996) RNA Virus Evolution via a Fitness-Space Model. Phys Rev Lett 76: 4440–3.
[13]
Gordo I, Perfeito L, Sousa A (2001) Fitness effects of mutations in bacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 21: 20–35.
[14]
Rozen DE, de Visser JAGM, Gerrish PJ (2002) Fitness Effects of Fixed Beneficial Mutations in Microbial Populations. Current Biology 12: 1040–5.
[15]
Kao KC, Sherlock G (2008) Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 40: 1499–504.
[16]
Jablonka E, Raz G (2009) Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q Rev Biol 84: 131–76.
[17]
Jablonka E, Lamb MJ (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. MIT Press. 462 p.
[18]
Rando OJ, Verstrepen KJ (2007) Timescales of Genetic and Epigenetic Inheritance. Cell 128: 655–68.
[19]
West-Eberhard MJ (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press. 794 p.
[20]
Gilbert SF, Epel D (2009) Ecological Developmental Biology: Integrating Epigenetics, Medicine, and Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Incorporated. 480 p.
[21]
Danchin é, Charmantier A, Champagne F, Mesoudi A, Pujol B, et al. (2011) Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution. Nat Rev Genet 12: 475–86.
[22]
Lachmann M, Jablonka E (1996) The inheritance of phenotypes: an adaptation to fluctuating environments. J Theor Biol 181: 1–9.
[23]
Helanter？ HU (2010) The Price Equation and Extended Inheritance. Philosophy & Theory in Biology 2. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.6959004.0？002.001
[24]
Stolovicki E, Dror T, Brenner N, Braun E (2006) Synthetic Gene Recruitment Reveals Adaptive Reprogramming of Gene Regulation in Yeast. Genetics 173: 75–85.
[25]
David L, Stolovicki E, Haziz E, Braun E (2010) Inherited adaptation of genome-rewired cells in response to a challenging environment. HFSP J 4: 131–41.
[26]
David L, Ben-Harosh Y, Stolovicki E, Moore LS, Nguyen M, et al. (2013) Multiple genomic changes associated with reorganization of gene regulation and adaptation in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 30: 1514–26.
[27]
Katzir Y, Stolovicki E, Stern S, Braun E (2012) Cellular Plasticity Enables Adaptation to Unforeseen Cell-Cycle Rewiring Challenges. PLoS ONE 7(9): e45184.
[28]
Stern S, Dror T, Stolovicki E, Brenner N, Braun E (2007) Genome-wide transcriptional plasticity underlies cellular adaptation to novel challenge. Mol Syst Biol 3: 106.
[29]
Stolovicki E, Braun E (2011) Collective Dynamics of Gene Expression in Cell Populations. PLoS ONE 6(6): e20530.
[30]
Bataillon T, Joyce P, Sniegowski P (2013) As it happens: current directions in experimental evolution. Biol Lett Biol. Lett 9: 20120945.
[31]
Raser JM, O'Shea EK (2005) Noise in Gene Expression: Origins, Consequences, and Control. Science 309(5743): 2010–3.
[32]
Raj A, van Oudenaarden A (2008) Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135(2): 216–26.
[33]
Rosenfeld N, Young JW, Alon U, Swain PS, Elowitz MB (2005) Gene Regulation at the Single-Cell Level. Science 307(5717): 1962–5.
[34]
Salman H, Brenner N, Tung C, Elyahu N, Stolovicki E, et al. (2012) Universal protein fluctuations in populations of microorganisms. Phys Rev Lett 108(23): 238105.
[35]
Manrubia SC, Lázaro E, Pérez-Mercader J, Escarmís C, Domingo E (2003) Fitness distributions in exponentially growing asexual populations. Phys Rev Lett 90(18): 188102.
[36]
Levy SF, Ziv N, Siegal ML (2012) Bet Hedging in Yeast by Heterogeneous, Age-Correlated Expression of a Stress Protectant. PLoS Biol 10(5): e1001325.
[37]
Jablonka E (2012) Epigenetic Variations in Heredity and Evolution. Clin Pharmacol Ther 92(6): 683–8.
[38]
Huang S, Eichler G, Bar-Yam Y, Ingber DE (2005) Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. Phys Rev Lett 94(12): 128701.
[39]
Veening JW, Smits WK, Kuipers OP (2008) Bistability, Epigenetics, and Bet-Hedging in Bacteria. Annual Review of Microbiology 62(1): 193–210.
[40]
Veening JW, Stewart EJ, Berngruber TW, Taddei F, Kuipers OP, et al. (2008) Bet-hedging and epigenetic inheritance in bacterial cell development. PNAS 105(11): 4393–8.
[41]
Beaumont HJE, Gallie J, Kost C, Ferguson GC, Rainey PB (2009) Experimental evolution of bet hedging. Nature 462(7269): 90–3.
