全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2013 

Morphological Clines and Weak Drift along an Urbanization Gradient in the Butterfly, Pieris rapae

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083095

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Urban areas are increasing globally, providing opportunities for biodiversity researchers to study the process in which species become established in novel, highly disturbed habitats. This ecological process can be understood through analyses of morphological and genetic variation, which can shed light on patterns of neutral and adaptive evolution. Previous studies have shown that urban populations often diverge genetically from non-urban source populations. This could occur due to neutral genetic drift, but an alternative is that selection could lead to allele frequency changes in urban populations. The development of genome scan methods provides an opportunity to investigate these outcomes from samples of genetic variation taken along an urbanization gradient. Here we examine morphological variation in wing size and diversity at neutral amplified fragment length polymorphisms in the butterfly Pieris rapae L. (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) sampled from the center to the periphery of Marseille. We utilize established and novel environmental correlation approaches to scan genetic variation for evidence of selection. We find significant morphological differences in urban populations, as well as weak genetic structure and decreased genetic diversity in urban versus non-urban sites. However, environmental correlation tests provide little support for selection in our dataset. Our comparison of different methods and allele frequency clines suggests that loci identified as significant are false positives. Although there is some indication that selection may be acting on wing size in urban butterflies, genetic analyses suggest P. rapae are undergoing neutral drift.

References

[1]  United Nations (2012) World Urbanization Prospects, the 2011 Revision. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
[2]  Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, et al. (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319: 756–760.
[3]  McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, et al. (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosystems 1: 21–36.
[4]  Dearborn DC, Kark S (2009) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24: 432–440.
[5]  Manel S, Holderegger R (2013) Ten years of landscape genetics. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 614–621.
[6]  Carreiro MM, Tripler CE (2005) Forest remnants along urban-rural gradients: examining their potential for global change research. Ecosystems 8: 568–582.
[7]  Moilanen A, Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79: 2503–2515.
[8]  Stracey CM, Robinson SK (2012) Are urban habitats ecological traps for a native songbird? Season-long productivity, apparent survival, and site fidelity in urban and rural habitats. J Avian Biol 43: 50–60.
[9]  Young A, Boyle T, Brown T (1996) The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 413–418.
[10]  Gaggiotti OE (1996) Population genetic models of source-sink metapopulations. Theor Popul Biol 50: 178–208.
[11]  Unfried TM, Hauser L, Marzluff JM (2013) Effects of urbanization on Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population connectivity. Conserv Genet 14: 41–53.
[12]  Francis RA, Chadwick MA (2012) What makes a species synurbic? Appl Geogr 32: 514–521.
[13]  Badyaev AV, Young RL, Oh KP, Addison C (2008) Evolution on a local scale: Developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 62: 1951–1964.
[14]  Lizee MH, Manel S, Mauffrey JF, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2012) Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species-area relationship for urban butterfly communities. Landscape Ecol 27: 159–169.
[15]  Storz JF (2005) Using genome scans of DNA polymorphism to infer adaptive population divergence. Mol Ecol 14: 671–688.
[16]  Joost S, Bonin A, Bruford MW, Després L, Conord C, et al. (2007) A spatial analysis method (SAM) to detect candidate loci for selection: towards a landscape genomics approach to adaptation. Mol Ecol 16: 3955–3969.
[17]  Schoville SD, Bonin A, Fran?ois O, Lobreaux S, Melodelima C, et al. (2012) Adaptive genetic variation on the landscape: methods and cases. Annu Rev Ecol, Evol Syst 43: 23–43.
[18]  Manel S, Joost S, Epperson B, Storfer A, Holderegger R, et al. (2010) Perspectives on the use of landscape genetics to detect genetic adaptive variation in the field. Mol Ecol 19: 3760–3772.
[19]  Poncet BN, Herrmann D, Gugerli F, Taberlet P, Holderegger R, et al. (2010) Tracking genes of ecological relevance using a genome scan in two independent regional population samples of Arabis alpina. Mol Ecol 19: 2896–2907.
[20]  Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai C-Q, Todhunter RJ, Tiwari HK, et al. (2010) Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 42: 355–360.
[21]  McIntyre NE (2000) Ecology of urban arthropods: A review and a call to action. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93: 825–835.
[22]  Altermatt F (2012) Temperature-related shifts in butterfly phenology depend on the habitat. Global Change Biol 18: 2429–2438.
[23]  Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288–295.
[24]  Vekemans X (2002) AFLP-SURV 1.0: A program for genetic diversity analysis with AFLP (and RAPD) population data. Laboratoire de Génétique et d'Ecologie Végétales, Université Libre de Bruxelles.
[25]  Zhivotovsky LA (1999) Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers. Mol Ecol 8: 907–913.
[26]  Lynch M, Milligan B (1994) Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Mol Ecol 3: 91–99.
[27]  Beaumont MA (2005) Adaptation and speciation: what can FST tell us? Trends Ecol Evol 20: 435–440.
[28]  Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.
[29]  Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Boone CG, Groffman PM, et al. (2011) Urban ecological systems: Scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manage 92: 331–362.
[30]  McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127: 247–260.
[31]  Delaney KS, Riley SPD, Fisher RN (2010) A rapid, strong, and convergent genetic response to urban habitat fragmentation in four divergent and widespread vertebrates. PLoS One 5: e12767.
[32]  Sekar S (2012) A meta-analysis of the traits affecting dispersal ability in butterflies: can wingspan be used as a proxy? J Anim Ecol 81: 174–184.
[33]  Ducatez S, Baguette M, Trochet A, Chaput-Bardy A, Legrand D, et al.. (2012) Flight endurance and heating rate vary with both latitude and habitat connectivity in a butterfly species. Oikos.
[34]  Tanaka Y (1987) Polygenic analyses of morphological characters in Pieris rapae crucivora Boisduval (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). I. Heritability estimates. Appl Entomol Zool 22: 125–132.
[35]  Kimura K, Tsubaki Y (1986) Female size and age-specific fecundity in the small white butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora Boisduval (Lepidoptera: Pieriae). Res Popul Ecol 28: 295–304.
[36]  Andreasen AM, Stewart KM, Longland WS, Beckmann JP, Forister ML (2012) Identification of source-sink dynamics in mountain lions of the Great Basin. Mol Ecol 21: 5689–5701.
[37]  De Mita S, Thuillet A-C, Gay L, Ahmadi N, Manel S, et al. (2013) Detecting selection along environmental gradients: analysis of eight methods and their effectiveness for outbreeding and selfing populations. Mol Ecol 22: 1383–1399.
[38]  Ekblom R, Galindo J (2010) Applications of next generation sequencing in molecular ecology of non-model organisms. Heredity 107: 1–15.
[39]  Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokim?ki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokim?ki M-L, Dinetti M (2006) Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: Analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv 127: 336–344.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133