Variability in blood pressure predicts cardiovascular disease in young- and middle-aged subjects, but relevant data for older individuals are sparse. We analysed data from the PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER) study of 5804 participants aged 70–82 years with a history of, or risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure (standard deviation) was determined using a minimum of five measurements over 1 year; an inception cohort of 4819 subjects had subsequent in-trial 3 years follow-up; longer-term follow-up (mean 7.1 years) was available for 1808 subjects. Higher systolic blood pressure variability independently predicted long-term follow-up vascular and total mortality (hazard ratio per 5 mmHg increase in standard deviation of systolic blood pressure = 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.4; hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.2, respectively). Variability in diastolic blood pressure associated with increased risk for coronary events (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2–1.8 for each 5 mmHg increase), heart failure hospitalisation (hazard ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.8) and vascular (hazard ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.7) and total mortality (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.1–1.5), all in long-term follow-up. Pulse pressure variability was associated with increased stroke risk (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0–1.4 for each 5 mmHg increase), vascular mortality (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0–1.3) and total mortality (hazard ratio 1.1, 95% confidence interval 1.0–1.2), all in long-term follow-up. All associations were independent of respective mean blood pressure levels, age, gender, in-trial treatment group (pravastatin or placebo) and prior vascular disease and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Our observations suggest variability in diastolic blood pressure is more strongly associated with vascular or total mortality than is systolic pressure variability in older high-risk subjects.
References
[1]
Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, et al. (2005) Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 111: 697–716.
[2]
O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mancia G, et al. (2005) Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 23: 697–701.
[3]
Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, et al. (2003) Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 42: 1206–1252.
[4]
Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, et al. (2007) 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 25: 1105–1187.
[5]
Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, Bilo G, de Leeuw P, et al. (2008) European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: a summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens 26: 1505–1526.
[6]
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R (2002) Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 360: 1903–1913.
[7]
Klungel OH, de Boer A, Paes AH, Nagelkerke NJ, Seidell JC, et al. (2000) Estimating the prevalence of hypertension corrected for the effect of within-person variability in blood pressure. J Clin Epidemiol 53: 1158–1163.
[8]
Marshall T (2004) When measurements are misleading: modelling the effects of blood pressure misclassification in the English population. BMJ 328: 933.
[9]
Keenan K, Hayen A, Neal BC, Irwig L (2009) Long term monitoring in patients receiving treatment to lower blood pressure: analysis of data from placebo controlled randomised controlled trial. BMJ 338: b1492.
[10]
Rothwell PM (2010) Limitations of the usual blood-pressure hypothesis and importance of variability, instability, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 375: 938–948.
[11]
Cuffe RL, Howard SC, Algra A, Warlow CP, Rothwell PM (2006) Medium-term variability of blood pressure and potential underdiagnosis of hypertension in patients with previous transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Stroke 37: 2776–2783.
[12]
Howard SC, Rothwell PM (2003) Regression dilution of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients with established cerebrovascular disease. J Clin Epidemiol 56: 1084–1091.
[13]
Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, et al. (2010) Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 375: 895–905.
[14]
Muntner P, Shimbo D, Tonelli M, Reynolds K, Arnett DK, et al. (2011) The relationship between visit-to-visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Hypertension 57: 160–166.
[15]
Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, Bollen EL, Buckley BM, et al. (2002) Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360: 1623–1630.
[16]
Ford I, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, Shepherd J, Cobbe SM, et al. (2002) A Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER): Screening Experience and Baseline Characteristics. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 3: 8.
[17]
Shepherd J, Blauw GJ, Murphy MB, Cobbe SM, Bollen EL, et al. (1999) The design of a prospective study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk (PROSPER). PROSPER Study Group. PROspective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk. Am J Cardiol 84: 1192–1197.
[18]
Kikuya M, Hozawa A, Ohokubo T, Tsuji I, Michimata M, et al. (2000) Prognostic significance of blood pressure and heart rate variabilities: the Ohasama study. Hypertension 36: 901–906.
[19]
Pringle E, Phillips C, Thijs L, Davidson C, Staessen JA, et al. (2003) Systolic blood pressure variability as a risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular mortality in the elderly hypertensive population. J Hypertens 21: 2251–2257.
[20]
Frattola A, Parati G, Cuspidi C, Albini F, Mancia G (1993) Prognostic value of 24-hour blood pressure variability. J Hypertens 11: 1133–1137.
[21]
Parati G, Pomidossi G, Albini F, Malaspina D, Mancia G (1987) Relationship of 24-hour blood pressure mean and variability to severity of target-organ damage in hypertension. J Hypertens 5: 93–98.
[22]
Tozawa M, Iseki K, Yoshi S, Fukiyama K (1999) Blood pressure variability as an adverse prognostic risk factor in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14: 1976–1981.
[23]
Havlik RJ, Foley DJ, Sayer B, Masaki K, White L, et al. (2002) Variability in midlife systolic blood pressure is related to late-life brain white matter lesions: the Honolulu-Asia Aging study. Stroke 33: 26–30.
[24]
Hata Y, Kimura Y, Muratani H, Fukiyama K, Kawano Y, et al. (2000) Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of brain infarction in elderly hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res 23: 553–560.
[25]
Hata Y, Muratani H, Kimura Y, Fukiyama K, Kawano Y, et al. (2002) Office blood pressure variability as a predictor of acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients receiving antihypertensive therapy. J Hum Hypertens 16: 141–146.
[26]
Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, et al. (2010) Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 375: 895–905.
[27]
Geeganage C, Tracy M, England T, Sare G, Moulin T, et al. (2011) Relationship between baseline blood pressure parameters (including mean pressure, pulse pressure, and variability) and early outcome after stroke: data from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TAIST). Stroke 42: 491–493.
[28]
Grove JS, Reed DM, Yano K, Hwang LJ (1997) Variability in systolic blood pressure–a risk factor for coronary heart disease? Am J Epidemiol 145: 771–776.
[29]
Webb AJ, Fischer U, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM (2010) Effects of antihypertensive-drug class on interindividual variation in blood pressure and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 375: 906–915.
