全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2012 

Survival Analysis of Patients with Heart Failure: Implications of Time-Varying Regression Effects in Modeling Mortality

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037392

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Background Several models have been designed to predict survival of patients with heart failure. These, while available and widely used for both stratifying and deciding upon different treatment options on the individual level, have several limitations. Specifically, some clinical variables that may influence prognosis may have an influence that change over time. Statistical models that include such characteristic may help in evaluating prognosis. The aim of the present study was to analyze and quantify the impact of modeling heart failure survival allowing for covariates with time-varying effects known to be independent predictors of overall mortality in this clinical setting. Methodology Survival data from an inception cohort of five hundred patients diagnosed with heart failure functional class III and IV between 2002 and 2004 and followed-up to 2006 were analyzed by using the proportional hazards Cox model and variations of the Cox’s model and also of the Aalen’s additive model. Principal Findings One-hundred and eighty eight (188) patients died during follow-up. For patients under study, age, serum sodium, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and left ventricular ejection fraction were significantly associated with mortality. Evidence of time-varying effect was suggested for the last three. Both high hemoglobin and high LV ejection fraction were associated with a reduced risk of dying with a stronger initial effect. High creatinine, associated with an increased risk of dying, also presented an initial stronger effect. The impact of age and sodium were constant over time. Conclusions The current study points to the importance of evaluating covariates with time-varying effects in heart failure models. The analysis performed suggests that variations of Cox and Aalen models constitute a valuable tool for identifying these variables. The implementation of covariates with time-varying effects into heart failure prognostication models may reduce bias and increase the specificity of such models.

References

[1]  Bleumink GS, Knetsch AM, Sturkenboom MC, Straus SM, Hofman A (2004) Quantifying the heart failure epidemic: prevalence, incidence rate, lifetime risk and prognosis of heart failure The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J. 25(18): 1614.1619
[2]  Jhund PS, MacIntyre K, Simpson CR, Lewsey JD, Stewart S (2009) Long-Term trends in first hospitalization for heart failure and subsequent survival between 1986 and 2003: a population study of 5.1 million people. Circulation. 119: 515.523
[3]  Chen J, Normand SLT, Wang Y, Krumholtz HM (2011) National and Regional Trends in Heart Failure Hospitalization and Mortality Rates for Medicare Beneficiaries, 1998–2008. JAMA 306(15): 1669.1678
[4]  Lietz K, Long JW, Kfoury AG, Slaughter MS, Silver MA (2007) Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy in the post-REMATCH era: implications for patient selection. Circulation 116(5): 497.505
[5]  Slaughter MS, Rogers JG, Milano CA, Russell SD, Conte JV (2009) Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. N Engl J Med. 361(23): 2241.2251
[6]  Gottlieb SS (2009) Prognostic indicators: useful for clinical care? J Am Coll Cardiol. 53(4): 343.344
[7]  Kalogeropoulos AP, Georgiopoulou VV, Giamouzis G, Smith AL, Agha SA (2009) Utility of the Seattle Heart Failure Model in patients with advanced heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 53(4): 334.342
[8]  Goldraich L, Beck-da-Silva L, Clausell N (2009) Are scores useful in advanced heart failure? Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 7(8): 985.997
[9]  Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Chen TM, Wong KL, Goin JE (1997) Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation 95(12): 2660.2667
[10]  Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, Sutradhar SC, Anker SD (2006) The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation 113(11): 1424.1433
[11]  Abraham WT, Fonarow GC, Albert NM, Stough WG, Gheorghiade M (2008) Predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure: insights from the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF). J Am Coll Cardiol 52(5): 347.356
[12]  Fonarow GC, Adams KF Jr, Abraham WT, Yancy CW, Boscardin WJ (2005) Risk stratification for in-hospital mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure: classification and regression tree analysis. JAMA 293(5): 572.580
[13]  Martinussem T, Scheike TH (2006) Dynamic regression models for survival data. New York: Springer Verlag. 470p p.
[14]  Aalen OO (1980) A model for nonparametric regression analysis of counting processes. In: Mathematical statistics and probability theory, editors W. Klonecki, A. Kozek & J. Rosinski. Lecture Notes in Statistics 2: 1–25, New York: Springer-Verlag.
[15]  Aalen OO (1989) A linear regression model for the analysis of life times. Statist. Med. 8: 907.925
[16]  Aalen OO (1993) Further results on the non-parametric linear regression model in survival analysis. Statist Med. 12: 1569.1588
[17]  McKeague IW, Sasieni PD (1994) A partly parametric additive risk model. Biometrika 81(3): 504.514
[18]  McKee PA, Castelli WP, McNamara PM, Kannel WB (1971) The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. 285(26): 1441.1446
[19]  Hunt SA (2005) ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol. 46(6): e1.82
[20]  Kaplan EL Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association(53): 547.581
[21]  Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 50(3): 163.170
[22]  Cox D (1972) Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 34(2): 187.220
[23]  Cortese G, Scheike TH, Martinussem T (2009) Flexible survival regression modelling. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1–24 doi:10.1177/0962280209105022.
[24]  Team RDC (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at. http://www.R-project.org.
[25]  Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Statistics and BioInformatics website. R package coxvc version 1-1-1. Accessed 2012 April 28.
[26]  Grambsch PM, Therneau TM (1994) Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 81: 515.526
[27]  Cox DR, Snell EJ (1968) A general definition of residuals. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B. 30: 248.275
[28]  Maller R, Zhou X (1996) Survival analysis with long-term survivals. New York:Wiley.
[29]  Volinsky CT, Raftery AE (2000) Bayesian information criterion for censored survival models. Biometrics. 56(1): 256.262

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133