While China’s accounting firms are
focusing on purely for the limited liability partnership, the study on the form
of accounting firm organization becomes more and more warmly. We specifically
analyzed the research achievement of accounting firm organization form in Britain and China, and put forward of the
prospect and direction for the study on accountant firm transformation theory
in our country.
References
[1]
S. M. Chen, S. Y. J. Sun and D. H. Wu, “Client Importance, Institutional Improvements, and Audit Quality in China: An Office and Individual Auditor Level Analysis,” The Accounting Review, Vol. 85, No. 1 2010, pp. 127-158. doi:10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.127
[2]
C. W. Liu and T. C. Wang, “Auditor Liability and Business Investment,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 4, 2006, pp. 1051-1071.
doi:10.1506/E023-337T-180P-18U4
[3]
A. Ferguson and D. Stokes, “Brand Name Audit Pricing, Industry Specialization, and Leadership Premiums Post-Big 8 and Big 6 Mergers,” Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2002, pp. 77-110.
[4]
R. Ewert, E. Feess and M. Nell, “Auditor Liability Rules under Imperfect Information, and Costly Litigation: The Welfare-increasing Effect of Liability Insurance,” The European Accounting Review, 2000, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 371-385. doi:10.1080/09638180020017122
[5]
Schwartz. Auditors’Liability, “Vague Due Care, and Auditing Standards,” Review of Quantitative, Finance and Accounting, 1998(11), pp. 183-207.
[6]
V. G. Narayanan, “An Analysis of Auditor Liability Rules,” Journal of Accounting Research, 1994, pp. 39-59. doi:10.2307/2491438
[7]
N. Dopuch and R. King, “Negligence Versus Strict Liability Regimes in Auditing: An Experimental Investigation, The Accounting Review,1992, Vol. 1, pp. 97-120.
