全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
Challenges  2013 

Happiness versus the Environment—A Case Study of Australian Lifestyles

DOI: 10.3390/challe4010056

Keywords: subjective wellbeing, carbon footprint, households

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Crafting environmental policies that at the same time enhance, or at least not reduce people’s wellbeing, is crucial for the success of government action aimed at mitigating environmental impact. However, there does not yet exist any survey that refers to one and the same population, and that allows the identifying relationships and trade-offs between subjective wellbeing and the complete environmental impact of households. In order to circumvent the lack of comprehensive survey information, we attempt to integrate two separate survey databases, and describe the challenges associated with this integration. Our results indicate that carbon footprints are likely to increase, but wellbeing levels off with increasing income. Living together with people is likely to create a win-win situation where both climate and wellbeing benefit. Car ownership obviously creates emissions, however personal car ownership enhances subjective wellbeing, but living in an area with high car ownership decreases subjective wellbeing. Finally, gaining educational qualifications is linked with increased emissions. These results indicate that policy-making is challenged in striking a wise balance between individual convenience and the common good.

References

[1]  Lenzen, M.; Cummins, R.A. Lifestyles and well-being versus the environment. J. Ind. Ecol. 2011, 15, 650–652, doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00397.x.
[2]  Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A.; Gowdy, J. Environmental degradation and happiness. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 60, 509–516, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.005.
[3]  Brown, K.W.; Kasser, T. Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Soc. Indic. Res. 2005, 74, 349–368, doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.
[4]  Welsch, H. Environmental welfare analysis: A life satisfaction approach. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 62, 544–551.
[5]  Pacione, M. Introduction on urban environmental quality and human wellbeing. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 2003, 65, 1–3, doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00231-1.
[6]  Smyth, R.; Mishra, V.; Qian, X. The environment and well-being in urban China. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68, 547–555.
[7]  MacKerron, G.; Mourato, S. Life satisfaction and air quality in London. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 1441–1453, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.10.004.
[8]  Gatersleben, B.; Steg, L.; Vlek, C. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Enviro. Behav. 2002, 34, 335–362, doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004.
[9]  Veenhoven, R. World Database of Happiness—Correlates of Happiness, 2013. Available online: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_cor/cor_fp.htm (accessed on 14 April 2013).
[10]  Zidan?ek, A. Sustainable development and happiness in nations. Energy 2007, 32, 891–897, doi:10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.016.
[11]  nef. Happy Planet Index: 2012 Report—A global index of sustainable well-being, 2012. Available online: http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/happy-planet-index-2012-report (accessed on 14 April 2013).
[12]  Wachsmann, U.; Wood, R.; Lenzen, M.; Schaeffer, R. Structural decomposition of energy use in Brazil from 1970 to 1996. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 578–587.
[13]  Wood, R. Structural decomposition analysis of Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 4943–4948, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.060.
[14]  Jackson, T.; Marks, N. Consumption, sustainable welfare and human needs—With reference to UK expenditure patterns between 1954 and 1994. Ecol. Econ. 1999, 28, 421–441, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00108-6.
[15]  Jackson, T.; Papathanasopoulou, E. Luxury or “lock-in”? An exploration of unsustainable consumption in the UK: 1968 to 2000. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 68, 80–95, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.026.
[16]  Druckman, A.; Jackson, T. The carbon footprint of UK households 1990–2004: A socio-economically disaggregated, quasi-multi-regional input–output model. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 2066–2077, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.013.
[17]  Jackson, T. Prosperity without Growth; Earthscan: London, UK, 2009.
[18]  Druckman, A.; Jackson, T. The bare necessities: How much household carbon do we really need? Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1794–1804, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.018.
[19]  Steinberger, J.K.; Krausmann, F.; Eisenmenger, N. Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1148–1158, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.009.
[20]  Steinberger, J.K.; Roberts, J.T. From constraint to sufficiency: The decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 70, 425–433, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.014.
[21]  Druckman, A.; Buck, I.; Hayward, B.; Jackson, T. Time, gender and carbon: A study of the carbon implications of British adults’ use of time. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 84, 153–163, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.008.
[22]  Haberl, H.; Steinberger, J.K.; Plutzar, C.; Erb, K.-H.; Gaube, V.; Gingrich, S.; Krausmann, F. Natural and socioeconomic determinants of the embodied human appropriation of net primary production and its relation to other resource use indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 23, 222–231, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.027.
[23]  Steinberger, J.K.; Roberts, J.T.; Peters, G.P.; Baiocchi, G. Pathways of human development and carbon emissions embodied in trade. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 81–85.
[24]  Layard, R. Happiness: Lessons from a New Science; Penguin Press: London, UK, 2005.
[25]  Kahneman, D.; Krueger, A.B.; Schkade, D.; Schwarz, N.; Stone, A.A. Would you be happier if you were richer? A focusing illusion. Science 2006, 312, 1908.
[26]  Wiedmann, T.; Minx, J. A Definition of “Carbon Footprint”. Ecological Economics Research Trends; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2008. Available online: https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=5999 (accessed on 18 April 2013).
[27]  Lenzen, M. The importance of goods and services consumption in household greenhouse gas emissions calculators. Ambio 2001, 30, 439–442.
[28]  Cummins, R.A.; Eckersley, R.; Pallant, J.; van Vugt, J.; Misajon, R. Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Soc. Indic. Res. 2003, 64, 159–190, doi:10.1023/A:1024704320683.
[29]  International Wellbeing Group. Personal Wellbeing Index Manual. Personal Wellbeing Index Manual. 2006. Available online: http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index/ (accessed on 15 April 2013).
[30]  Cummins, R.A. Subjective wellbeing, homeostatically protected mood and depression: A synthesis. J. Happiness Stud. 2010, 11, 1–17.
[31]  Schwarz, N.; Strack, F. Evaluating one’s life: A judgement model of subjective well-being. In Subjective Well-being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective; Strack, F., Argyle, M., Schwarz, N., Eds.; Plenum Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 27–47.
[32]  Schwarz, N. Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. Am. Psychol. 1999, Feb, 93–105, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.2.93.
[33]  Jones, L.V.; Thurstone, L.L. The psychophysics of semantics: An experimental investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 1955, 39, 31–36, doi:10.1037/h0042184.
[34]  Cummins, R.A.; Gullone, E. Why we Should Not Use 5-point Likert Scales: The Case for Subjective Quality of Life Measurement. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2000; pp. 74–93.
[35]  Herendeen, R.; Tanaka, J. Energy cost of living. Energy 1976, 1, 165–178, doi:10.1016/0360-5442(76)90015-3.
[36]  Lenzen, M.; Wier, M.; Cohen, C.; Hayami, H.; Pachauri, S.; Schaeffer, R. A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan. Energy 2006, 31, 181–207.
[37]  Hertwich, E.G. The life-cycle environmental impacts of consumption. Econ. Syst. Res. 2010, 23, 27–47, doi:10.1080/09535314.2010.536905.
[38]  Hertwich, E.G. Consumption and industrial ecology. J. Ind. Ecol. 2005, 9, 1–6, doi:10.1162/1088198054084536.
[39]  Tukker, A.; Cohen, M.J.; Hubacek, K.; Mont, O. Sustainable consumption and production. J. Ind. Ecol. 2010, 14, 1–3, doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00214.x.
[40]  ABS. Household Expenditure Survey—Detailed Expenditure Items; Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, Australia, 2007.
[41]  ABS. Australian National Accounts, Input-Output Tables, 2008-09; Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, Australia, 2012.
[42]  AGO. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory; Department of the Environment and Water Resources, Australian Greenhouse Office: Canberra, Australia, 2009.
[43]  ABS. Water Account for Australia 2004-05; Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, Australia, 2006.
[44]  ABS. Integrated Regional Data Base (IRDB); Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, Australia, 2006.
[45]  ABARE. Australian Commodity Statistics, 2009. Available online: http://www.abareconomics.com (accessed on 15 April 2013).
[46]  Wood, R.; Lenzen, M.; Foran, B. A material history of Australia: Evolution of material intensity and drivers of change. J. Ind. Ecol. 2009, 13, 847–862, doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00177.x.
[47]  ISA. Indicators. Information Sheet 6, 2010. Available online: http://www.isa.org.usyd.edu.au/research/InformationSheets/ISATBLInfo6_v1.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2013).
[48]  ACQOL. Reports of the Australian Unity Wellbeing Surveys (2001–2010). Available online: http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm (accessed on 15 April 2013).
[49]  Dey, C.; Berger, C.; Foran, B.; Foran, M.; Joske, R.; Lenzen, M.; Wood, R. Household Environmental Pressure from Consumption: An Australian Environmental Atlas. In Water Wind Art and Debate—How Environmental Concerns Impact on Disciplinary Research; Birch, G., Ed.; Sydney University Press: Sydney, Australia, 2007; pp. 280–314.
[50]  Hertwich, E.G.; Peters, G.P. Carbon footprint of nations: A global, trade-linked analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 6414–6420, doi:10.1021/es803496a.
[51]  Wier, M.; Lenzen, M.; Munksgaard, J.; Smed, S. Environmental effects of household consumption pattern and lifestyle. Econ. Syst. Res. 2001, 13, 259–274, doi:10.1080/09537320120070149.
[52]  Frey, B.S.; Stutzer, A. What can economists learn from happiness research? J. Econ. Lit. 2002, 40, 402–435, doi:10.1257/002205102320161320.
[53]  Gowdy, J. Toward a new welfare foundation for sustainability. In Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics Number 0401; Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: Troy, NY, USA, 2004.
[54]  Stutzer, A. The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2004, 54, 89–109, doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2003.04.003.
[55]  Mayraz, G.; Layard, R.; Nickell, S. The functional relationship between income and happiness. In Presented at the 3rd European Conference on Positive Psychology, Braga, Portugal, 3–6 July 2006.
[56]  Abdallah, S.; Thompson, S.; Marks, N. Estimating worldwide life satisfaction. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 35–47, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.009.
[57]  Brereton, F.; Clinch, J.P.; Ferreira, S. Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 386–396, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.008.
[58]  Cummins, R.A.; Collard, J.; Woerner, J.; Weinberg, M.; Lorbergs, W.; Perera, C. Australian Unity Wellbeing index—Report 22.0. The wellbeing of Australians—Who makes the decisions, health/wealth control, financial advice, and handedness. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University: Melbourne, Australia, 2009. Available online: http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/index_wellbeing/index.htm (accessed on 15 April 2013).
[59]  Mead, R.; Cummins, R.A. What Makes Us Happy?; Australian Unity and Deakin University: Melbourne, Australia, 2008.
[60]  Wiedenhofer, D.; Lenzen, M.; Steinberger, J.K. Spatial and socioeconomic drivers of direct and indirect household energy consumption in Australia. In Urban Consumption; Newton, P., Ed.; CSIRO Publishing: Collingwood, VIC, Australia, 2011; pp. 251–266.
[61]  Monbiot, G. Rich can’t blame the poor for the p-word. Guard Weekly 2008, 24.
[62]  Monbiot, G. The poor will not destroy the planet. Guard Weekly 2008, 19.
[63]  Jackson, T. Living better by consuming less? J. Ind. Ecol. 2005, 9, 19–36, doi:10.1162/1088198054084734.
[64]  Kempton, W. Will public environmental concern lead to action on global warming? Annu. Rev. Energy 1993, 18, 217–245.
[65]  Lutzenhiser, L. Social and behavioral aspects of energy use. Annu. Rev. Energy 1993, 18, 247–289.
[66]  Stokes, D.; Lindsay, A.; Marinopoulos, J.; Treloar, A.; Wescott, G. Household carbon dioxide production in relation to the greenhouse effect. J. Environ. Manage. 1994, 40, 197–211, doi:10.1006/jema.1994.1015.
[67]  McKibben, B. Worried? Us? Granta 2003, 83, 7–12.
[68]  Poortinga, W.; Steg, L.; Vlek, C. Values, environmental concern, and environmental behaviour. Environ. Behav. 2004, 36, 70–93, doi:10.1177/0013916503251466.
[69]  Vringer, K.; Aalbers, T.; Blok, K. Household energy requirement and value patterns. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 553–566.
[70]  Hertwich, E.G. The environmental effect of car-free housing: A case in Vienna. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65, 516–530, doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.022.
[71]  Holden, E.; Linnerud, K. Environmental attitudes and household consumption: An ambigous relationship. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 13, 217–231, doi:10.1504/IJSD.2010.037555.
[72]  Whitmarsh, L.; Seyfang, G.; O’Neill, S. Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public “carbon capable”? Glob. Environ. Change 2011, 21, 56–65, doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.011.
[73]  Owens, S. Engaging the public: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environ. Plan. A 2000, 32, 1141–1148.
[74]  Lenzen, M.; Dey, C.J.; Murray, J. A personal approach to teaching about climate change. Austr. J. Environ. Educ. 2002, 18, 35–45.
[75]  Wilby, P. Grandma’s 80W bulb will kill her grandkids. Guard Weekly 2007, 24.
[76]  Beekman, V. A green third way? Philosophical reflections on government interventions in non-sustainable lifestyles, 2001. Available online: http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wda/lang?dissertatie/nummer=2942PhD (accessed on 15 April 2013).
[77]  Beekman, V. Sustainable development and future generations. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2004, 17, 3–22.
[78]  Monbiot, G. Humans cannot be trusted. Guard Weekly 2007, 18.
[79]  Trainer, F.E. Can renewable energy sources sustain affluent society? Energy Policy 1997, 23, 1009–1026.
[80]  Trainer, T. Can renewables etc. solve the greenhouse problem? The negative case. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 4107–4114, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.037.
[81]  Grice, J. National accounts, wellbeing, and the performance of government. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2011, 27, 620–633.
[82]  Diener, E.; Tov, W. National Accounts of Well-Being. In Handbook of Social Indicators and Quality of Life Research; Land, K.C., Michalos, A.C., Sirgy, M.J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 137–158.
[83]  Government of Bhutan. Bhutan will be the first country with expanded capital accounts. 2012. Available online: http://www.2apr.gov.bt/images/stories/coredoc/remarkbypm.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2013).
[84]  OECD. How’s life? Measuring well-being. 2011. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/statistics/howslife.htm (accessed on 15 April 2013).
[85]  OECD. Better life initiative: Measuring well-being and progress. OECD: Paris, France, 2012. Available online: http://www.oecd.org/statistics/betterlifeinitiativemeasuringwell-beingandprogress.htm (accessed on 14 April 2013).
[86]  nef. National Accounts of Well-being. 2013. Available online: http://www.nationalaccountsofwellbeing.org (accessed on 14 April 2013).
[87]  ESS. European Social Survey. 2013. Available online: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org (accessed on 14 April 2013).
[88]  UNSD. Handbook of national accounting: Integrated environmental and economic accounting (SEEA 2003). 2003. Available online: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/envAccounting/seea2003.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2013).
[89]  Stone, R. Demographic Input-output: An Extension of Social Accounting; North-Holland Publishing Company: Geneva, Switzerland, 1970.
[90]  Poortinga, W.; Steg, L.; Vlek, C.; Wiersma, G. Household preferences for energy-saving measures: A conjoint analysis. J. Econ. Psychol. 2003, 24, 49–64, doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00154-X.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133