THE APPLICATION OF THE SPECIALTY PRINCIPLE, CONCERNING THE SPECIAL SEIZURE IN ROMANIAN CRIMINAL LAW

This paper aims to be a comparative analysis of the special seizure as a safety measure, as it is regulated in Romanian special criminal legislation, and also a way to highlight certain discrepancies between the general and special criminal legislation. Special seizure, as a safety measure, may be disposed under Criminal Code regulations, as a general norm, but also under some stipulations included in special Criminal laws. Moreover, when there are such special stipulations, they have under the rules of specialty principle, priority in implementing to the general norm. In our opinion, in these cases, special seizure is also disposed under the Criminal Code provisions, as general norm, because the general terms nondescript by others field of incidence, are the ones who set by the Criminal law. In fact, in such cases, the special seizure is ordered under both Criminal provisions. In analysis of the paper, is made reference to the applicability of special seizure measure inmatter of corruption offences, in customs, money laundering, illicit trafficking of drugs and fisheries and fish farming, and as a result of their presentation, we concluded that although is in question the specialty principle, mainly would find application the general norm in comparison with special norm. Moreover, corroborating the actually general norm with the provisions of the New Criminal Code, we believe the special seizure, should operate exclusively under the general law, or the provisions of the special norm, should be modified.