彩色多普勒技术测定动脉踝肱指数在2型糖尿病外周血管病变中的应用
The Application of ABI in Peripheralvascular Disease Using the Method of CDFI in Type 2 Diabetic

DOI: 10.12677/ACRVM.2013.21001, PP. 1-6

Keywords: 2型糖尿病；踝肱指数；外周血管病变；彩色多普勒技术
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Ankle Brachial Index (ABI), Peripheralvascular Disease (PAD), Color Doppler

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的：采用彩色多普勒血流成像技术测定2型糖尿病患者的踝肱指数，研究踝肱指数与糖尿病合并血管病变的关系，为临床T2DM患者血管病变的早期诊断提供依据。方法：选择健康志愿者40例(A组)及包头医学院第一附属医院住院的65例2型糖尿病患者，均按WHO诊断标准及临床特点确诊，采用飞利浦IU22彩色超声诊断仪测定踝肱指数，以踝肱指数 < 0.9为外周血管病变组(B组)，踝肱指数 ≥ 0.9为非外周血管病变组(C组)，应用单因素方差分析比较两组病人的年龄、性别、病程、血脂及糖化血红蛋白等各项检验指标及踝肱指数，以P < 0.05认为差异有统计学意义。结果：65例2型糖尿病患者中B组21例，其中出现足部的坏疽及溃疡的1例，出现足背动脉搏动减弱、间歇性跛行或静息痛6例，下肢动脉的硬化狭窄17例；C组44例，其中足背动脉搏动减弱、间歇性跛行或静息痛有3例，无一例发生足部的坏疽及溃疡，无下肢动脉的硬化狭窄，两组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论：2型糖尿病患者中踝肱指数降低程度与外周血管病变发生率呈正相关，两组组临床资料比较，前者具有年龄大、病程长、血脂、糖化血红蛋白明显升高的特点。彩色多普勒血流成像技术检测2型糖尿病患者踝肱指数，可用于判断2型糖尿病患者外周血管病变程度，为临床预防其的发生发展提供可靠依据。

Purpose: Research the relationship between ABI (ankle brachial index) and diabetes mellitus with vascular disease using color Doppler ultrasound in diabetic patients, providing the early information of diabetic vascular disease to the clinicians. Objects and Methods: Choose 44 healthy volunteers (group A) and 65 patients in our hospital diagnosed as type 2 diabetes with WHO diagnostic criteria and clinical characteristics and collected the various clinical data. Then, measured ABI using the method of CDFI With Philips IU22 color ultrasound diagnostic apparatus, ABI equal 0.9 as the Separatrix, the PAD group (group B) with ABI less than 0.9 and greater than 0.9 belongs to the non-PAD group (group C). Single factor analysis of variance compared the two groups of patients in ABI and age, gender, disease duration, FPG, HbA1c, TG, CHOL, HDL-C, LDL-C, EDD, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: 65 patients with T2DM patients with ABI less than0.9 in21 cases, there’s gangrene and ulcer in foot 1 case, there dorsalis pedis artery fluctuations reduced, intermittent claudication or pain at rest in 6 patients (33%), while the group B in 3 patients (4%) dorsalis pedis artery pulse weakened, intermittent claudication or pain at rest, two groups there were significant differences (P < 0.05). The more significantly the ABI value reduced, the more significantly different in age, duration, TG, LDL-C, HbA1cbetween the two group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The application of ABI in peripheralvascular disease using the method of CDFI in type 2 diabetes mellitus can be used to test the seriousness of vascular complications.

References

[1]	M. Al-Qaisi, D. M. Nott, D. H. King and S. Kaddoura. Ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI): An update for practitioners. Vascular Health and Risk Management, 2009, 5: 833-841.
[2]	M. M. McDermott, M. H. Criqui, K. Liu, J. M. Guralnik, P. Greenland, G. J. Martin and W. Pearce. Lower ankle/brachial index, as calculated by averaging the dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arterial pressures, and association with leg functioning in peripheral arterial disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2000, 32(6): 1164-1171.
[3]	M. A. Allison, W. R. Hiatt, A. T. Hirsch, J. R. Coll and M. H. Criqui. A high ankle-brachial index is associated with increased cardiovascular disease morbidity and lower quality of life. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008, 51(13): 1292- 1298.
[4]	American Diabetes Association. Peripheral arterial disease in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care, 2003, 26(12): 3333-3341.
[5]	V. Aboyans, E. Ho, J. O. Denenberg, L. A. Ho, L. Natarajan and M. H. Criqui. The association between elevated ankle systolic pressures and peripheral occlusive arterial disease in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2008, 48(5): 1197-1203.
[6]	S. Novo. Classification, epidemiology, risk factors, and natural history of peripheral arterial disease. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 2002, 4(Suppl. 2): S1-S6.
[7]	C. A. Doubeni, R. A. Yood, S. Emani and J. H. Gurwitz. Identifying unrecognized peripheral arterial disease among asymptomatic patients in the primary care set-ting. Angiology, 2006, 57(2): 171-180.
[8]	R. Stein, I. Hriljac, J. L. Halperin, S. M. Gustavson, V. Teodorescu and J. W. Olin. Limitation of the resting ankle-brachial index in symptomatic patients with periph-eral arterial disease. Journal of Vascular Medicine, 2006, 11(1): 29-33.
[9]	P. S. Montgomery, A. W. Gardner. The clinical utility of a six- minute walk test in peripheral arterial occlusive disease patients. Jour-nal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1998, 46(6): 706- 711.
[10]	N. U. Jeelani, B. D. Braithwaite, C. Tomlin and S. T. MacSweeney. Varia-tion of method for measurement of brachial artery pressure signifi-cantly affects ankle-brachial pressure index values. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2000, 20(1): 25-28.
[11]	M. F. Caruana, A. W. Bradbury and D. J. Adam. The validity, reliability, reproducibility and extended utility of ankle to brachial pressure index in current vascular surgical practice. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2005, 29(5): 443-451.
[12]	V. Kaiser, A. D. Kester, H. E. Stoffers, P. J. Kitslaar and J. A. Knottnerus. The influence of experience on the reproducibility of the ankle-brachial systolic pressure ratio in peripheral arterial occlusive disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 1999, 18(1): 25-29.
[13]	B. L. Bendermacher, J. A. Teijink, E. M. Willigendael, et al. A clinical pre-diction model for the presence of peripheral arterial disease- the benefit of screening individuals before initiation of measurement of the an-kle-brachial index: An observational study. Vascular Medicine, 2007, 12(1): 5-11.
[14]	D. Treat-Jacobson, J. G. Regensteiner, M. A. Creager, J. W. Olin, S. H. Krook, D. B. Hunninghake, A. J. Comerota, M. E. Walsh, M. M. McDermott and W. R. Hiatt. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA, 2001, 19(286): 1317-1324.
[15]	H. H. Feringa, J. J. Bax, V. H. van Waning, et al. The long-term prognostic value of the resting and postexercise ankle-brachial index. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2006, 166(5): 529-535.
[16]	S. H. Wild, C. D. Byrne, F. B. Smith, A. J. Lee and F. G. Fowkes. Low ankle-brachial pressure index predicts increased risk of cardiovascular disease independent of the metabolic syndrome and conventional cardiovascular risk factors in the Edinburgh Artery Study. Diabetes Care, 2006, 29(3): 637-642.

Full-Text