全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Use of an Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device for Experimental Retinal Detachment in Rabbit Eyes

DOI: 10.3390/jfb4010006

Keywords: OVD, optical coherence tomography, retinal adhesive, retinal detachment, retinal glue, vitrectomy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

To investigate the temporary tamponade effects of an ophthalmic viscosurgical device (OVD) for experimental retinal tears, we performed vitrectomy in four rabbit eyes and created a posterior vitreous detachment and artificial retinal tear to produce retinal detachment. The retina was flattened with liquid perfluorocarbon (PFC), the area peripheral to the tear was photocoagulated, an OVD was applied to the retinal tear surface below the PFC and the PFC was removed by aspiration. In the control group, PFC was removed without application of OVD. At one, three and seven days postoperatively, funduscopy and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed to examine the sealing process of the retinal tear. In OVD-treated eyes, the OVD remained on the retinal surface, and the retinal tear was patched for ≥ 3 days postoperatively. By seven days postoperatively, the OVD on the retinal surface had disappeared, and the retina was reattached. In control eyes, the edge of the retinal tear was rolled, and retinal detachment persisted. In OVD-treated eyes, the border of the retinal tear was indistinct, and the defect area was significantly decreased. These results show that application of an OVD effectively seals retinal tears and eliminates retinal detachments.

References

[1]  Minihan, M.; Tanner, V.; Williamson, T.H. Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: 20 years of change. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2001, 85, 546–548, doi:10.1136/bjo.85.5.546.
[2]  Heimann, H.; Bartz-Schmidt, K.U.; Bornfeld, N.; Weiss, C.; Hilgers, R.D.; Foerster, M.H. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 2007, 114, 2142–2154, doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.09.013.
[3]  Leaver, P. Expanding the role of vitrectomy in retinal reattachment surgery. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1993, 77, 197, doi:10.1136/bjo.77.4.197.
[4]  Barrie, T. Debate overview. Repair of a primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 87, 790, doi:10.1136/bjo.87.6.790.
[5]  McLeod, D. Is it time to call time on the scleral buckle? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004, 88, 1357–1359, doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.050146.
[6]  Coleman, D.J.; Lucas, B.C.; Fleischman, J.A.; Dennis, P.H., Jr.; Chang, S.; Iwamoto, T.; Nalbandian, R.M. A biologic tissue adhesive for vitreoretinal surgery. Retina 1988, 8, 250–256, doi:10.1097/00006982-198808040-00006.
[7]  Hida, T.; Sheta, S.M.; Proia, A.D.; McCuen, B.W. Retinal toxicity of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in the rabbit. Retina 1988, 8, 148–153, doi:10.1097/00006982-198808020-00013.
[8]  Sueda, J.; Fukuchi, T.; Usumoto, N.; Okuno, T.; Arai, M.; Hirose, T. Intraocular use of hydrogel tissue adhesive in rabbit eyes. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2007, 51, 89–95, doi:10.1007/s10384-006-0405-2.
[9]  Liggett, P.E.; Cano, M.; Robin, J.B.; Green, R.L.; Lean, J.S. Intravitreal biocompatibility of mussel adhesive protein. A preliminary study. Retina 1990, 10, 144–147, doi:10.1097/00006982-199004000-00011.
[10]  Smiddy, W.E.; Glaser, B.M.; Green, W.R.; Connor, T.B., Jr.; Roberts, A.B.; Lucas, R.; Sporn, M.B. Transforming growth factor beta. A biologic chorioretinal glue. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1989, 107, 577–580, doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010591036.
[11]  Teruya, K.; Sueda, J.; Arai, M.; Tsurumaru, N.; Yamakawa, R.; Hirata, A.; Hirose, T. Patching retinal breaks with Seprafilm in experimental rhegmatogenous retinal detachment of rabbit eyes. Eye 2009, 23, 2256–2259, doi:10.1038/eye.2008.403.
[12]  Liesegang, T.J. Viscoelastic substances in ophthalmology. Surv. Ophthalmol. 1990, 34, 268–293, doi:10.1016/0039-6257(90)90027-S.
[13]  Glasser, D.B.; Katz, H.R.; Boyd, J.E.; Langdon, J.D.; Shobe, S.L.; Peiffer, R.L. Protective effects of viscous solutions in phacoemulsification and traumatic lens implantation. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1989, 107, 1047–1051, doi:10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020109041.
[14]  Koch, D.D.; Liu, J.F.; Glasser, D.B.; Merin, L.M.; Haft, E. A comparison of corneal endothelial changes after use of Healon or Viscoat during phacoemulsification. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1993, 115, 188–201.
[15]  Baino, F. Towards an ideal biomaterial for vitreous replacement: Historical overview and future trends. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 921–935, doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.10.030.
[16]  McDermott, M.L.; Hazlett, L.D.; Barrett, R.P.; Lambert, R.J. Viscoelastic adherence to corneal endothelium following phacoemulsification. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 1998, 24, 678–683.
[17]  Hu, M.; Sabelman, E.E.; Tsai, C.; Tan, J.; Hentz, V.R. Improvement of Schwann cell attachment and proliferation on modified hyaluronic acid strands by polylysine. Tissue Eng. 2000, 6, 585–593, doi:10.1089/10763270050199532.
[18]  Lane, D.; Motolko, M.; Yan, D.B.; Ethier, C.R. Effect of healon and viscoat on outflow facility in human cadaver eyes. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2000, 26, 277–281, doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(99)00357-0.
[19]  Yamada, T.; Sawada, R.; Tsuchiya, T. The effect of sulfated hyaluronan on the morphological transformation and activity of cultured human astrocytes. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 3503–3513, doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.03.044.
[20]  Hirata, A.; Okinami, S. Viability of topical endoscopic imaging system for vitreous surgery in rabbit eyes. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging 2012, 43, 64–67.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133