Recent profound changes have been observed in the Arctic environment, including record low sea ice extents and high latitude greening. Studying the Arctic and how it is changing is an important element of climate change science. The Tundra, an ecoregion of the Arctic, is directly related to climate change due to its effects on the snow ice feedback mechanism and greenhouse gas cycling. Like all ecoregions, the Tundra border is shifting, yet studies and policies require clear delineation of boundaries. There are many options for ecoregion classification systems, as well as resources for creating custom maps. To help decision makers identify the best classification system possible, we present a review of North American Tundra ecoregion delineations and further explore the methodologies, purposes, limitations, and physical properties of five common ecoregion classification systems. We quantitatively compare the corresponding maps by area using a geographic information system.
References
[1]
Markham, C.R. On the origin and migrations of the greenland esquimaux. J. Roy Geogr. Soc. London 1865, 35, 87–99, doi:10.2307/3698081.
[2]
National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC). Arctic Sea Ice Extent Settles at Record Seasonal Minimum, Available online: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2012/09/arctic-sea-ice-extent-settles-at-record-seasonal-minimum/ (accessed on 30 September 2012).
[3]
White, D.; Hinzman, L.; Alessa, L.; Cassano, J.; Chambers, M.; Falkner, K.; Francis, J.; Gutowski, W.J.; Holland, M.; Holmes, R.M.; et al. The arctic freshwater system: Changes and impacts. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, doi:10.1029/2006JG000353.
[4]
Arft, A.M.; Walker, M.D.; Gurevitch, J.; Alatalo, J.M.; Bret-Harte, M.S.; Dale, M.; Diemer, M.; Gugerli, F.; Henry, G.H.R.; Jones, M.H.; et al. Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: Meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecol. Monogr. 1999, 69, 491–511.
[5]
Foley, J.A. Tipping points in the tundra. Science 2005, 310, 627–628, doi:10.1126/science.1120104.
[6]
Henry, G.H.; Molau, U. Tundra plants and climate change: The international tundra experiment (itex). Glob. Change Biol. 1997, 3, 1–9, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.1997.gcb132.x.
[7]
Liston, G.E.; Mcfadden, J.P.; Sturm, M.; Pielke, R.A. Modelled changes in arctic tundra snow, energy and moisture fluxes due to increased shrubs. Glob. Change Biol. 2002, 8, 17–32, doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00416.x.
[8]
Walker, M.D.; Wahren, C.H.; Hollister, R.D.; Henry, G.H.; Ahlquist, L.E.; Alatalo, J.M.; Bret-Harte, M.S.; Calef, M.P.; Callaghan, T.V.; Carroll, A.B.; et al. Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 1342–1346, doi:10.1073/pnas.0503198103.
[9]
Jeong, J.H.; Kug, J.S.; Kim, B.M.; Min, S.K.; Linderholm, H.W.; Ho, C.H.; Rayner, D.; Chen, D.; Jun, S.Y. Greening in the circumpolar high-latitude may amplify warming in the growing season. Clim. Dynam. 2012, 38, 1421–1431, doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1142-x.
[10]
Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). Geographical Coverage.
[11]
Loveland, T.R.; Merchant, J.M. Ecoregions and ecoregionalization: Geographical and ecological perspectives. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S1–S13, doi:10.1007/s00267-003-5181-x.
[12]
Thornthwaite, C.W. The climates of north america: According to a new classification. Geogr. Rev. 1931, 21, 633–655, doi:10.2307/209372.
[13]
Merriam, C.H. Life Zones and Crop Zones of the United States; US Department of Agriculture, Division of Biological Survey: Washington, DC, USA, 1898.
[14]
Clements, F.E.; Shelford, V.E. Bioecology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1939; p. 425.
[15]
Maini, J.S. Phytoecological study of sylvotundra at small tree lake, NWT. Arctic 1966, 19, 220–243.
[16]
Tikhomirov, B.A. Plantgeographical investigations of the tundra vegetation in the soviet union. Can. J. Bot. 1960, 38, 815–832, doi:10.1139/b60-072.
[17]
Thompson, R.S.; Shafer, S.L.; Anderson, K.H.; Strickland, L.E.; Pelltier, R.T.; Bartlein, P.J.; Kerwin, M.W. Topographic, bioclimatic, and vegetation characteristics of three ecoregion classification systems in north america: Comparisons along continent-wide transects. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S125–S148, doi:10.1007/s00267-003-7200-3.
[18]
Bliss, L.C. Arctic Tundra and Polar Desert Biome. In North American Terrestrial Vegetation, 2nd; Barbour, M.G., Billings, W.D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 1–40.
[19]
Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Ecological Regions of North America: Toward a Common Perspective; Commission for Environmental Cooperation: Montréal, QC, Canada, 1997.
[20]
Post, W.M.; Emanuel, W.R.; Zinke, P.J.; Stangenberger, A.G. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 1982, 298, 156–159.
Scholze, M.; Knorr, W.; Arnell, N.W.; Prentice, I.C. A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13116–13120.
[23]
Brandt, J.P. The extent of the north american boreal zone. Environ. Rev. 2009, 17, 101–161, doi:10.1139/A09-004.
[24]
British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range (BCMFR). Biogeoclimatic Maps;
[25]
Saucier, J.P.; Robitaille, A.; Grondin, P.; Bergeron, J.F.; Gosselin, J. Les Régions écologiques du Québec Méridional (Version 4). Scale: 1:1,250,000, Available online: http://www.mrnf.gouv.qc.ca/publications/forets/connaissances/carte-regions-ecologiques.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[26]
Canadian Forest Service. North American Boreal Zone Map Shapefiles;
[27]
Kottek, M.; Grieser, J.; Beck, C.; Rudolf, B.; Rubel, F. World map of the koppen-geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 2006, 15, 259–263, doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130.
[28]
Kottek, M.; Grieser, J.; Beck, C.; Rudolf, B.; Rubel, F. World Map of the K？ppen-Geiger Climate Classification Updated, Available online: http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/present.htm (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[29]
Alberta Tourism, Parks, and Recreation. 2005 Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta, Available online: http://tpr.alberta.ca/parks/heritageinfocentre/naturalregions/default.aspx (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[30]
Natural Regions Committee. Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta, Available online: http://www.tpr.alberta.ca/parks/heritageinfocentre/docs/NRSRcomplete%20May_06.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[31]
US Environmental Protection Agency. Ecoregions of North America. Scale: Various Scales;
University of Alaska Fairbanks. Map Catalog, Available online: http://www.arcticatlas.org/maps/catalog/index (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[34]
Latifovic, R.; Zhu, Z.L.; Cihlar, J.; Giri, C.; Olthof, I. Land cover mapping of north and central america—Global land cover 2000. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2004, 89, 116–127, doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.002.
[35]
Joint Research Centre, Land Resource Management Unit, European Comission. Global Land Cover-2000 Products; 2003.
[36]
World Wildlife Federation. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World;
[37]
Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E.; Wikramanayake, E.D.; Burgess, N.D.; Powell, G.V.N.; Underwood, E.C.; D’amico, J.A.; Itoua, I.; Strand, H.E.; Morrison, J.C.; et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience 2001, 51, 933–938, doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2.
[38]
Nowacki, G.; Spencer, P.; Fleming, M.; Brock, T.; Jorgenson, T. Unified Ecoregions of Alaska: 2001. Usgs Open File Report 02–297, 2001. Available online: http://agdcftp1.wr.usgs.gov/pub/projects/fhm/akecoregions.htm (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[39]
Elliott-Fisk, D.L. The Taiga and Boreal Forest. In North American Terrestrial Vegetation, 2nd; Barbour, M.G., Billings, W.D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 41–74.
[40]
Marshall, I.B.; Shut, P.H.; Ballard, M. National Ecological Framework for Canada, Available online: http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/ecostrat/index.html (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[41]
Ecological Stratification Working Group (ESWG). A National Ecological Framework for Canada; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research and Environment Canada, State of the Environment Directorate, Ecozone Analysis Branch: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1999.
[42]
Bailey, R.G. Ecoregions of North America. Scale: 1:15,000,000; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
[43]
Bailey, R.G.; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Ecoregions of North America;
[44]
Bailey, R.G. Description of the Ecoregions of the United States, 2nd; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
[45]
Nowacki, G.T.; Brock, T. Ecoregions and Subregions of Alaska, Ecomap Version 2.0. Scale: 1:5,000,000, Available online: http://agdc.usgs.gov/data/usgs/erosafo/ecoreg (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[46]
Schultz, J. The Ecozones of the World: The Ecological Divisions of the Geosphere; Springer-Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 1995.
[47]
Timoney, K.P. A Geobotanical Investigation of the Subarctic Forest-Tundra of the Northwest Territories. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1988.
[48]
Tuhkanen, S. A circumpolar system and indices in plant geography. Acta. Bot. Fenn. 1984, 127, 1–50.
[49]
Payette, S. The forest tundra and present tree-lines of the northern québec-labrador peninsula. Nordicana 1983, 47, 3–23.
[50]
Atkinson, K. Vegetation zonation in the canadian subarctic. Area 1981, 13, 13–17.
[51]
Brown, D.E.; Lowe, C.H.; Pase, C.P. A digitized classification system for the biotic communities of North America, with community (series) and association samples from the southwest. J. Ariz-Nev. Acad. Sci. 1979, 14, 1–16.
[52]
The Nature Conservancy. Biotic Communities of the Southwest GIS Layer, Available online: http://azconservation.org/downloads/biotic_communities_of_the_southwest_gis_data (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[53]
Franklin, J.F. The biosphere reserve program in the united states. Science 1977, 195, 262–267.
[54]
Oswald, E.T.; Senyk, J. Ecoregions of Yukon Territory; Canadian Forestry Service: Victoria, BC, USA, 1977.
[55]
Walter, H.; Box, E. Global classification of natural terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Ecol. 1976, 32, 75–81, doi:10.1007/BF02111901.
[56]
Udvardy, M.D.F. A Classification of the Biogeographical Provinces of the World; International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: Morges, Switzerland, 1975; p. 48.
[57]
FAO GeoNetwork. Udvardy’s Ecoregions, Available online: http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id=1008 (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[58]
International Union of Conservation of Nature. UNEP-WCMC Metadata-Udvardy’s Biogeographical Provinces, Available online: http://www.unep-wcmc.org/medialibrary/2011/10/03/7d9d7a51/Udvardy_metadata.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
Lobeck, A.K. Physiographic Provinces of North America (Scale: 1:12,000,000); Hammond: Maplewood, NJ, USA, 1948.
[62]
Dice, L.R. The Biotic Provinces of North America; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1943; p. 78.
[63]
Hargrove, W.W.; Hoffman, F.M. Using multvariate clustering to characterize ecoregion borders. Comput. Sci. Eng. 1999, 1, 18–25, doi:10.1109/5992.774837.
[64]
Zhou, Y.; Narumalani, S.; Waltman, W.J.; Waltman, S.W.; Palecki, M.A. A GIS-based spatial pattern analysis model for eco-region mapping and characterization. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2003, 17, 445–462, doi:10.1080/1365881031000086983.
McMahon, G.; Gregonis, S.M.; Waltman, S.W.; Omernik, J.M.; Thorson, T.D.; Freeouf, J.A.; Rorick, A.H.; Keys, J.E. Developing a spatial framework of common ecological regions for the conterminous united states. Environ. Manage. 2001, 28, 293–316, doi:10.1007/s0026702429.
[67]
Omernik, J.M. Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S27–S38, doi:10.1007/s00267-003-5197-2.
Hargrove, W.W.; Hoffman, F.M. Potential of multivariate quantitative methods for delineation and visualization of ecoregions. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S39–S60, doi:10.1007/s00267-003-1084-0.
[70]
Gallant, A.L.; Loveland, T.R.; Sohl, T.L.; Napton, D.E. Using an ecoregion framework to analyze land-cover and land-use dynamics. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S89–S110, doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0145-3.
[71]
Omernik, J.M. Ecoregions of the conterminous united states. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr. 1987, 77, 118–125, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00149.x.
[72]
US Environmental Protection Agency. Level IV Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States;
[73]
Wiken, E.B.; Nava, F.J.; Griffith, G.E. North American Terrestrial Ecoregions—Level III, Available online: ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/pubs/NA_TerrestrialEcoregionsLevel3_Final-2june11_CEC.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[74]
Indiana Biological Survey Aquatic Research Center. Ecoregions, Available online: http://www.indiana.edu/~inbsarc/ecoregions.html (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[75]
Linam, G.W.; Kleinsasser, L.J.; Mayes, K.B. Regionalization of the Index of Biotic Integrity for Texas Streams, Available online: http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/publications/pwdpubs/media/pwd_rp_t3200_1086.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[76]
Buettner, G.; Hendricks, A.; Boness, K.; Ballard, L.; Bright, K.; Brill, K.; Cassady, S.; Castillo, K.; Dahlberg, H.; Dawe, C. Arizona Forest Resource Strategy, Available online: ftp://ftp.epa.gov/ wed/ecoregions/pubs/Arizona_Forest_Resource_Strategy_2010.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[77]
Bailey, R.G. Ecoregions Map of North America : Explanatory Note; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
[78]
Hoekstra, J.M.; Molnar, J.L.; Jennings, M.; Revenga, C.; Spalding, M.D.; Boucher, T.M.; Robertson, J.C.; Heibel, T.J.; Ellison, K. The Atlas of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges and Opportunities to Make a Difference; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2010.
[79]
Sotomayor, L. Terrestrial and Marine Ecoregions of the United States. Available online: http://gis.tnc.org/data/MapbookWebsite/map_page.php?map_id=103 (accessed on 23 January 2013).
[80]
National Wildlife Federation. Ecoregions;
[81]
US Department of Agriculture, Colorado State University. UV-B Monitoring Climatological and Research Network;
[82]
Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E. The global 200: A representation approach to conserving the earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12, 502–515.
[83]
Omernik, J.M. Ecoregions: A Spatial Framework for Environmental Management. In Biological Asessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making; Davis, W., Simon, T., Eds.; Lewis Publishing: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; pp. 49–62.
[84]
Environmental Systems Resource Institute (ESRI). SDC Feature Database, World Continents; ESRI: Redlands, CA, USA, 2012.
[85]
US Geological Survey. Alaska Ecoregions Mapping;
[86]
US Environmental Protection Agency. Level III Ecoregions of the Continental United States;
[87]
Wiken, E.B. Terrestrial Ecozones of Canada; Ecological Land Classification Series; Environment Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1986.
[88]
Wiken, E.B.; Gauthier, D.A.; Marshall, I.B.; Lawton, K.; Hirvonen, H. A Perspective on Canada’s Ecosystems: An Overview of the Terrestrial and Marine Ecozones; Occasional Paper; Canadian Council on Ecological Areas: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1996.
[89]
Bailey, R.G. Ecoregions of the United States (Scale: 1:7,500,000); USDA Forest Service: Ogden, UT, USA, 1976.
[90]
K？ppen, W. Grundriss der Klimakunde; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1931.
[91]
Bailey, R.G.; Cushwa, C.T. Ecoregions of North America (Scale: 1:12,000,000); US Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1981.
[92]
Van Vliet, J.; Bregt, A.K.; Hagen-Zanker, A. Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222, 1367–1375, doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.017.
[93]
Monserud, R.A.; Leemans, R. Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic. Ecol. Model. 1992, 62, 275–293, doi:10.1016/0304-3800(92)90003-W.
[94]
Foody, G.M. Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2004, 70, 627–633.
[95]
Visser, H.; de Nijs, T. The map comparison kit. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2006, 21, 346–358, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.11.013.
[96]
Anderson, M.; Comer, P.; Grossman, D.; Groves, C.; Poiani, K.; Reid, M.; Schneider, R.; Vickery, B.; Weakley, A. Guidelines for Representing Ecological Communities in Ecoregional Conservation Plans, Available online: http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/cbdgateway/era/standards/supportmaterials/std7sm/EcoregionConservation%20PlansGuide.pdf (accessed on 28 March 2013).
[97]
Rowe, J.S. Forest Regions of Canada; Information Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1972.
[98]
Viereck, L.A.; Little, E.L. Alaska Trees and Shrubs; US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1972.
