Bioética y derecho para qué y para quiénes? Discusiones en torno a la regulación de las técnicas de reproducción humana asistida en Colombia

Bioethics and law for what and whom? Discussions about the Regulation of assisted reproductive techniques in Colombia The recent concern for the normative regulation of assisted reproduction techniques (ART), raises discussions about how to manage the embryos, how many times to use a sample, how to define parenthood, and other issues. However, it has not been questioned who would be favoured with these regulations and what is their contribution to social equity and development for an entire country. Considering that the urgency to guarantee the sexual and reproductive rights —theoretical framework invoked to require ART— should be aimed at reaching a fair society. The proposed analysis will be undertaken considering the case of applying the ART for surrogate mothers in Colombia. The paper presents the context in which it is intended to apply the normative regulation, alongside the review of some conceptual and empirical contributions by Michael Sandel concerning trends in surrogate motherhood among developed and third world countries. This should allow considering the profiles of fertility in Colombia as a sign of inequality in our country. Subsequently, we will approach the current legal discussion in Colombia concerning surrogate motherhood, from the only case of surrogate motherhood resolved by the Colombian Constitutional Court and the bill projects presented in the Colombian Congress to regulate this issue. Finally, we will present some reflections and discussion on the normative regulation of the ART and surrogate gestation, and the law as a transmission belt of varied interests, that is, that it ought to lead to common good, solidarity and cooperation, and not simply function as a regulator that ensures the fulfilment of contracts. Las recientes preocupaciones por la regulación normativa de las técnicas de reproducción humana asistida (TRHA) suscitan especialmente discusiones sobre cómo administrar los embriones, cuántas veces usar una muestra, cómo definir la filiación, entre otros. Sin embargo, no se ha cuestionado directamente a quienes estaría amparándose con estas regulaciones y cuál sería su contribución a la equidad social y al desarrollo de todo un país, pues la urgencia de salvaguardar los derechos sexuales y reproductivos —marco teórico invocado para exigir la regulación de las TRHA— debe apuntar necesariamente a la consecución de una sociedad menos desigual. El análisis propuesto será abordado a partir del caso de la aplicación de las TRHA para la maternidad subrogada en Colombia. En el artículo se presenta inicialmente el contexto