Réne Girard’ n “ü gen Arzu Modeli” Perspektifinde Fuz l ’nin “Leyla Vü Mecn n” Adl Eserinin ncelenmesi - A Research of Fuzuli’s “Leyla Vu Mecnun” on The Perspective of Réne Girard’s” Triangular Desire Model”

ZArast rman n Temelleri: Fuz l ’nin Leyla vü Mecn n adl mesnevisinde Réne Girard’ nü gen arzu modelinin sekillenmesiArast rman n Amac : Leyla vü Mecn n adl mesnevinin, Girard’ n modeli ile analiziyap lacakt r.Veri Kaynaklar : Réne Girard’ n “ü gen Arzu Modeli” olarak tan mlanan teorisi veFuz l ’nin “Leyla vü Mecn n” adl mesnevisi ile destekleyici diger kaynaklar.Ana Tart sma: Fuz l ’nin eseri acaba ger ekten nesne ile znenin dogrudan iliskisine dayal ,düz bir izgi seklinde tezahür eden basit bir “romantik yalan” rnegi mi yoksa Tanr !n ndolay mlay c ve/veya nesnenin kendisi oldugu “romansal hakikat” tezini dogrulayan daha karmas kyap l bir eser mi sorusuna cevap aranacak.Sonu lar: Kays ( zne) ve Leyla (arzulanan nesne) aras nda vas tas z (dolay mlay c s z),dogrudan bir iliski gibi g rünen ve eseri bir “Romantik Yalan” kurgulamas olarak düsündürecekyap n n, asl nda znenin arzu nesnesi olan Leyla’dan ve onun ask ndan, dolay mlay c s olan Tanr ’yave ilahi aska y nelmesi seklinde ortaya kan, tam anlam yla bir “romansal hakikat” rnegi oldugug sterilecektir.Anahtar Kelimeler: Dolay mlay c , zne, Arzulanan Nesne, Ask, Kays, Leyla, Tanr ABSTRACTBasis of Research: Existence of Réne Girard’s “Triangular Desire Model” in Fuzuli’smathnawi named “Leyla vu Mecnun”.Purpose of the Research: The mathnawi named “Leyla vu Mecnun” is to be analysed by themeans of Girard’s theory named “triangular desire model”.Data Sources: The theory of Réne Girard described as “triangular desire model” and Fuzuli’smathnawi named “Leyla vu Mecnun” with other supporting sources.Main Discussion: Whether the main structure of Fuzuli’s mathnawi composed of a love storyin the form of a straight line exemplifying a “romantic lie”, based upon the direct relation of thesubject and the object or a work which verifies the thesis of “novelist truth” which occurs in a formthat the desire of subject transforms from love for Leyla to God “the mediator” and divine love.Results: It will be stated that the structure of the work in which love of Kays and Leyla seemsas a direct relation without a third party (mediator) and which makes anyone think the work as a“romantic lie” construction, is exactly a sample of “novelist truth” existing in a form that subjectdirects its desire from Leyla and love for her towards God and divine love.Key Words: Mediator, Subject, Desired Object, Love, Kays, Leyla, God