Hazard detection systems must be evaluated with appropriate test material concentrations under controlled conditions in order to accurately identify and quantify unknown residues commonly utilized in theater. The existing assortment of hazard reference sample preparation methods/techniques presents a range of variability and reproducibility concerns, making it increasingly difficult to accurately assess optically- based detection technologies. To overcome these challenges, we examined the optimization, characterization, and calibration of microdroplets from a drop-on-demand microdispenser that has a proven capability for the preparation of energetic reference materials. Research presented herein focuses on the development of a simplistic instrument calibration technique and sample preparation protocol for explosive materials testing based on drop-on-demand technology. Droplet mass and reproducibility were measured using ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectroscopy. The results presented here demonstrate the operational factors that influence droplet dispensing for specific materials (e.g., energetic and interferents). Understanding these parameters permits the determination of droplet and sample uniformity and reproducibility (typical R 2 values of 0.991, relative standard deviation or RSD ≤ 5%), and thus the demonstrated maturation of a successful and robust methodology for energetic sample preparation.
Yasuda, K.; Woodka, M.; Polcha, M.; Pinkham, D. Reproducible Deposition of Trace Explosives Onto Surfaces for Test Standards Generation. In RDER-NV-TR-265; Science and Technology Division: Fort Belvoir, VA, USA, 2010.
[3]
Holthoff, E.L.; Farrell, M.E.; Pellegrino, P.M. Investigating a drop-on-demand microdispenser for standardized sample preparation. Proc SPIE 2012, doi:10.1117/12.918121.
[4]
Windsor, E.; Najarro, M.; Bloom, A.; Benner, B.; Fletcher, R.; Lareau, R.; Gillen, G. Application of inkjet printing technology to produce test materials of 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazcyclohexane for trace explosive analysis. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 8519–8524.
[5]
Bloom, A.N.; Gillen, G.; Najarro, M.; Windsor, E. Inkjet printed explosive standards. Abstr. Pap. Amer. Chem. Soc. 2009, 237, 204.
[6]
Windsor, E.; Gillen, G.; Najarro, M. ANYL 96-Use of drop-on-demand inkjet printing technology to produce reference materials for trace level explosive analysis. Abstr. Pap. Amer. Chem. Soc. 2008, 236, 1.
Holthoff, E.L.; Hankus, M.E.; Tober, K.Q.; Pellegrino, P.M. Investigating a drop-on-demand microdispenser for standardized sample preparation. Proc. SPIE 2011, doi:10.1117/12.883451.
[9]
Farrell, M.E.; Holthoff, E.L.; Pellegrino, P.M. Next generation surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates for hazard detection. Proc. SPIE 2012, doi:10.1117/12.916425.
[10]
Yeonjun, O.; Jihoon, K.; Young Joon, Y.; Hyotae, K.; Ho Gyu, Y.; Sung-Nam, L.; Jonghee, K. Inkjet printing of Al2O3 dots, lines, and films: From uniform dots to uniform films. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2011, 11, S359–S363.
[11]
Baeg, K.J.; Khim, D.; Kim, J.H.; Kang, M.; You, I.K.; Kim, D.Y.; Noh, Y.Y. Improved performance uniformity of inkjet printed n-channel organic field-effect transistors and complementary inverters. Org. Electron. 2011, 12, 634–640.
[12]
Lee, E.R. Microdrop Generation (Nano- and Microscience, Engineering, Technology and Medicine); CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003.
[13]
Background on Inkjet Technology Technical Notes No. 99-01. Available online: www.microfab.com/equipment/technotes/technote99-01.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2013).
[14]
Englmann, M.; Fekete, A.; Gebefugi, I.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P. The dosage of small volumes for chromatographic quantifications using a drop-on-demand dispenser system. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 388, 1109–1116.
[15]
Dong, H.; Carr, W.W.; Morris, J.F. Visualization of drop-on-demand inkjet: Drop formation and deposition. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2006, doi:10.1063/1.2234853.
[16]
Fluid Properties Effects on Ink-Jet Device Performance Technical Notes No. 99-02. 1999. Available online: http://www.microfab.com/images/pdfs/technote99-02.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2013).
[17]
Drive Waveform Effects on Ink-Jet Device Performance MicroFab Technote 99-03. 1999. Available online: http://www.microfab.com/images/pdfs/technote99-03.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2013).
[18]
Orifice Diameter Effects MicroFab Technote 99-04. 1999. Available online: http://www.microfab.com/images/pdfs/technote99-04.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2013).
[19]
Miettinen, J.; Kaija, K.; Mantysalo, M.; Mansikkamaki, P.; Kuchiki, M.; Tsubouchi, M.; Ronkka, R.; Hashizume, K.; Kamigori, A. molded substrates for inkjet printed modules. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 2009, 32, 293–301.
[20]
Singh, B.K.; Hillier, A.C. Multicolor surface plasmon resonance imaging of ink jet-printed protein microarrays. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5124–5132.
Yang, Y.; Omi, S.; Goto, R.; Yahiro, M.; Era, M.; Watanabe, H.; Oki, Y. Wavelength sensitive photodiodes in the visible based on J-type aggregated films patterned by inkjet method. Org. Electron. 2010, 12, 405–410.
[23]
Eggers, J.; Villermaux, E. Physics of liquid jets. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2008, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/71/3/036601.
[24]
Eggers, J. Theory of drop formation. Phys. Fluids 1995, 7, 941–953.
[25]
Emmons, E.D.; Farrell, M.E.; Holthoff, E.L.; Tripathi, A.; Green, N.; Moon, R.P.; Guicheateau, J.A.; Christesen, S.D.; Pellegrino, P.M.; Fountain, A.W., III. Characterization of polymorphic states in energetic samples of 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) fabricated using drop-on-demand inkjet technology. Appl. Spectrosc. 2012, 66, 628–635.
MicroFab Technologies, Inc. PH-05 User's Manual. Available online: http://www.microfab.com/archive/equipment/manuals_forms/PH05_user_manual.pdf (accessed 7 January 2013).
[28]
MicroFab Technologies, Inc. MJ-AT User's Manual. Available online: http://www.microfab.com/images/pdfs/manuals/mj_at_manual.pdf (accessed 7 January 2013).
[29]
Verkouteren, R.M.; Verkouteren, J.R. Inkjet metrology: High-accuracy mass measurements of microdroplets produced by a drop-on-demand dispenser. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 8577–8584.
