ANáLISE MORFOMéTRICA E DIAGNóSTICO AMBIENTAL DA MICROBACIA DO CóRREGO LIMO EM UBERABA – MG

the morphometric characteristics of microbasin Stream Limo. There was a visited in the studyarea, being applied questionnaire in a sample of local population. The social deteriorationcalculated (S) was of 34,5%, evidencing that the producers have urban origin and low instruction.For the economical factor (E) 39,1% were gotten and can be noticed the financial difficulty ofthe agricultural producer that has income up to five minimum wages, therefore its productivityare low. The technological factor (T) it was obtained 26,5%, index still low the range, that is the morphometric characteristics of microbasin Stream Limo. There was a visited in the studyarea, being applied questionnaire in a sample of local population. The social deteriorationcalculated (S) was of 34,5%, evidencing that the producers have urban origin and low instruction.For the economical factor (E) 39,1% were gotten and can be noticed the financial difficulty ofthe agricultural producer that has income up to five minimum wages, therefore its productivityare low. The technological factor (T) it was obtained 26,5%, index still low the range, that isthe morphometric characteristics of microbasin Stream Limo. There was a visited in the studyarea, being applied questionnaire in a sample of local population. The social deteriorationcalculated (S) was of 34,5%, evidencing that the producers have urban origin and low instruction.For the economical factor (E) 39,1% were gotten and can be noticed the financial difficulty ofthe agricultural producer that has income up to five minimum wages, therefore its productivityare low. The technological factor (T) it was obtained 26,5%, index still low the range, that isthe morphometric characteristics of microbasin Stream Limo. There was a visited in the studyarea, being applied questionnaire in a sample of local population. The social deteriorationcalculated (S) was of 34,5%, evidencing that the producers have urban origin and low instruction.For the economical factor (E) 39,1% were gotten and can be noticed the financial difficulty ofthe agricultural producer that has income up to five minimum wages, therefore its productivityare low. The technological factor (T) it was obtained 26,5%, index still low the range, that isrelated to the agricultural exploration in the area, and it misses the technical assistance. Forthe socioeconomic factor (S+E+T) 34,3% were gotten, low value, demonstrating the limitationon the conditions of the producer life. For the environmental factor it was obtained 25,0%,value also low, however it evidences that of the ambient already i